Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Ubuntu and Capabilities Approach: Basic Doctrines for Calibrating Humanitarian Action

   | 06. Aug. 2016

Zitieren

Buchanan-Smith, M. & Cosgrave, J. (2013). Evaluation of Humanitarian Action: Pilot Guide. The Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP), London: Overseas Development Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Burges, J.P. (2002). Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention: The Circle Closes. Security Dialogue, 33(3), 261-264.10.1177/0967010602033003002Search in Google Scholar

Clark, D.A. (2005). Sen’s capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(8), 1339-1368.10.1080/00220380500186853Search in Google Scholar

Darcy, J. (2004). Human Rights and Humanitarian Action: A review of the issues. Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) Background Paper. London: Overseas Development Group.Search in Google Scholar

Eliastam, J.L.B. (2015). Exploring Ubuntu discourse in South Africa: Loss, liminality and hope. Verbum et Ecclesia, 36(2), 1-8.10.4102/ve.v36i2.1427Search in Google Scholar

Fox, F. (2001). New Humanitarianism: Does It Provide a Moral Banner for the 21st Century? Disasters, 25(4), 275-289.10.1111/1467-7717.0017811780854Search in Google Scholar

Frangonikolopoulos, C.A. (2005). Non-governmental Organisations and Humanitarian Action: The Need for a Viable Change of Praxis and Ethos. Global Society, 19(1), 49-72.10.1080/1360082042000316040Search in Google Scholar

Hilhorst, D. &Schmiemann, N. (2002). Humanitarian principles and organisational culture: Everyday practice in Meedecins Sans Frontie res-Holland. Development in Practice, 12(3-4), 490-500.10.1080/0961450220149834Search in Google Scholar

Hilhorst, D. & Jansen, B. (2012). Constructing Rights and Wrongs in Humanitarian Action: Contributions from a Sociology of Praxis. Sociology, 46(5), 891-905.10.1177/0038038512452357Search in Google Scholar

Kamwangamalu, N.M. (1999). Ubuntu in South Africa: a Sociolinguistic Perspective to a Pan-African Concept. Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies, 13(2), 24-41.10.1080/02560049985310111Search in Google Scholar

Letseka, M. (2012). In Defence of Ubuntu. Studies in Philosophy Education, 31, 47-60.10.1007/s11217-011-9267-2Search in Google Scholar

Lucchi, E. (2012). Moving from the ‘why’ to the ‘how’: reflections on humanitarian response in urban settings. Disasters, 36(1), 87-104.10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01283.x22687158Search in Google Scholar

MacFarlene, S.N. & Weiss, T. (2000). Political Interest and Humanitarian Action. Security Studies, 10(1), 112-142.10.1080/09636410008429422Search in Google Scholar

Macrae, J. (1998). The Death of Humanitarianism: An Anatomy of the Attack. Disasters,22(4), 309-317.10.1111/1467-7717.000949874896Search in Google Scholar

Mkhize, N. (2008). Ubuntu and harmony: An African approach to morality and ethics. In Nicholson, R. (ed.) Persons in community: African ethics in a global culture, pp.35-44. Scottsville: UKZN Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mokgoro, Y. (1998). Ubuntu and the Law in South Africa. Potchefstroom Electronic Journal,1(1), 15-26.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, N. (2008). The Evolution of Humanitarian Action. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 27(1), 24-29.10.1093/rsq/hdn004Search in Google Scholar

Murithi, T. (2007). A local response to the global human rights standards: the Ubuntu perspective on human dignity. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5(3), 277-286.10.1080/14767720701661966Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, B. (2003). Ubuntu: Reflections of a South African on Common Humanity. Reflections, 4(4), 21-26.10.1162/152417303322004175Search in Google Scholar

Pease, K.K. & Forsythe, D.P. (1993). Human Rights, Humanitarian Intervention, and World Politics. Human Rights Quarterly, 15(2), 290-314.10.2307/762540Search in Google Scholar

Rapatsa, M. (2015). Human Dignity as a Foundational Norm in the Understanding of Human Rights. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 12(2), 41-53.Search in Google Scholar

Sachs, A. (2012). Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: Bringing Human Solidarity Back Into the Rights Education. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 4(3), 365-383.10.1093/jhuman/hus021Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A.K. (1985). Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169-221.10.2307/2026184Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A.K. (1992). Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A.K. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Sen, A.K. (2005). Human Rights and Capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151-166.10.1080/14649880500120491Search in Google Scholar

Slim, H. (2005). Idealism and Realism in Humanitarian Action. Two Talks Given at the ACFID Humanitarian Forum, Canberra, 5 October 2005. Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.Search in Google Scholar

Stoddard, A. (2009). Humanitarian NGOs: challenges and trends. In Joanna, M. & Adele, H., Humanitarian Action and the ‘Global War on Terror’: A Review of Trends and Issues, (eds.). pp.25-36, HPG Report, HPG: London.Search in Google Scholar

Tong, J. (2003). Questionable Accountability: MSF and Sphere in 2003. Disasters, 28(2), 176-189.10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00251.x15186363Search in Google Scholar

Tshoose, C.I. (2009). The Emerging Role of the Constitutional Value of Ubuntu for Informal Social Security in South Africa. African Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 12-19.10.1163/221097312X13397499736822Search in Google Scholar

Wright, H.R. (2012). Child care, children and capability. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(3), 409-424.10.1080/0305764X.2012.706256Search in Google Scholar

Zetter, R. & Deikun, G. (2010). Meeting humanitarian challenges in urban areas. Forced Migrant Review, 34(5), 5-7.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2286-2552
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Mathematik, Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Statistik, Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, Allgemeines, andere