<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Assessment of the impact on air quality for combustion sources should be carried out using advanced modelling systems with chemical transformation modules taken into account, especially for the facilities characterized by significant emission of gaseous air pollutants (including SO2). This approach increases the reliability of the obtained evaluation results by modelling the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA) in the air which can substantially contribute to PM10. This paper assesses in this regard selected chemical transformation modules (MESOPUFF, RIVAD/ARM3, ISORROPIA/RIVAD) available in the CALPUFF model (v. 6.42) and its application in the atmospheric dispersion modelling of air emissions from a coal-fired large combustion plant (LCP) not equipped with a flue gas desulphurization (FGD) system. It has been proven that consideration an additional mechanism of secondary sulfate aerosol formation in aqueous phase in the ISORROPIA/RIVAD module (AQUA option) causes a significant increase in the annual average concentration of PM10 in the air compared to the other considered options, along with the calculation variant which excludes chemical transformation mechanisms. Type of the selected chemical transformation module has no significant effect on the results of modelled NO, NO2 and NOx concentrations in the air. However, it can lead to different SO2 results, especially for annual averaged, and in some points, for the hourly averaged concentrations.</abstract>

Assessment of the impact on air quality for combustion sources should be carried out using advanced modelling systems with chemical transformation modules taken into account, especially for the facilities characterized by significant emission of gaseous air pollutants (including SO2). This approach increases the reliability of the obtained evaluation results by modelling the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA) in the air which can substantially contribute to PM10. This paper assesses in this regard selected chemical transformation modules (MESOPUFF, RIVAD/ARM3, ISORROPIA/RIVAD) available in the CALPUFF model (v. 6.42) and its application in the atmospheric dispersion modelling of air emissions from a coal-fired large combustion plant (LCP) not equipped with a flue gas desulphurization (FGD) system. It has been proven that consideration an additional mechanism of secondary sulfate aerosol formation in aqueous phase in the ISORROPIA/RIVAD module (AQUA option) causes a significant increase in the annual average concentration of PM10 in the air compared to the other considered options, along with the calculation variant which excludes chemical transformation mechanisms. Type of the selected chemical transformation module has no significant effect on the results of modelled NO, NO2 and NOx concentrations in the air. However, it can lead to different SO2 results, especially for annual averaged, and in some points, for the hourly averaged concentrations.

Impact of Use of Chemical Transformation Modules in Calpuff on the Results of Air Dispersion Modelling

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Assessment of the impact on air quality for combustion sources should be carried out using advanced modelling systems with chemical transformation modules...

Impact of Use of Chemical Transformation Modules in Calpuff on the Results of Air Dispersion Modelling

Online veröffentlicht: 30. Dez. 2016

Seitenbereich: 605 - 620

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2016-0043

Schlüsselwörter
air pollution modelling, CALPUFF, atmospheric chemical transformations, secondary inorganic aerosols, large combustion plants

© 2016 Robert Oleniacz et al., published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Impact of Use of Chemical Transformation Modules in Calpuff on the Results of Air Dispersion Modelling

Online veröffentlicht: 30. Dez. 2016

Seitenbereich: 605 - 620

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2016-0043

Schlüsselwörterair pollution modelling, CALPUFF, atmospheric chemical transformations, secondary inorganic aerosols, large combustion plants

© 2016 Robert Oleniacz et al., published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
air pollution modelling, CALPUFF, atmospheric chemical transformations, secondary inorganic aerosols, large combustion plants