This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.
Bund, E., Gerhard, U., Hoelscher, M. & Mildenberger, G. (2015). A Methodological Framework for Measuring Social Innovation. Historical Social Research, 40(3), 48–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.48-78BundE.GerhardU.HoelscherM.MildenbergerG.2015A Methodological Framework for Measuring Social InnovationHistorical Social Research4034878http://dx.doi.org/10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.48-78Search in Google Scholar
Černikovaitė, M. L. & Laužikas, M. (2011). The Model of Social Innovations in the Emerging Market of Lithuania. Intellectual Economics. 5(3(11)), 388–400. Retrieved from http://www.mruni.eu/lt/mokslo_darbai/ie/archyvas/dwn.php?id=299240ČernikovaitėM. L.LaužikasM.2011The Model of Social Innovations in the Emerging Market of LithuaniaIntellectual Economics53(11)388400Retrieved from http://www.mruni.eu/lt/mokslo_darbai/ie/archyvas/dwn.php?id=299240Search in Google Scholar
Dainienė, R. & Dagilienė, L. (2015). A TBL Approach Based Theoretical Framework for Measuring Social Innovations. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 20th International Scientific Conference “Economics and Management (ICEM–2015)”, 213, 275–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.537DainienėR.DagilienėL.2015A TBL Approach Based Theoretical Framework for Measuring Social InnovationsProcedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences.20th International Scientific Conference “Economics and Management (ICEM–2015)”213275280http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.537Search in Google Scholar
Dainienė, R. & Dagilienė, L. (2013). Company’s Going Concern Evaluation Fuzzy Model. Economics and management, 18(3), 374–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.3.3915DainienėR.DagilienėL.2013Company’s Going Concern Evaluation Fuzzy ModelEconomics and management183374382http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.3.3915Search in Google Scholar
Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting for the Triple Bottom Line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025539ElkingtonJ.1998Accounting for the Triple Bottom LineMeasuring Business Excellence231822http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025539Search in Google Scholar
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.ElkingtonJ.1997Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century BusinessOxfordCapstoneSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2013). European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard (EPSIS), A Pilot Exercise.European Commission2013European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard (EPSIS), A Pilot ExerciseSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2012). Financing Social Impact Funding social innovation in Europe – mapping the way forward. Social Innovation Europe (SIE). Belgium: European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-22141-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2769/31019European Commission2012Financing Social Impact Funding social innovation in Europe – mapping the way forwardSocial Innovation Europe (SIE).BelgiumEuropean UnionISBN 978-92-79-22141-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2769/31019Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2013). Guide to Social Innovation. Regional and Urban Policy. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/social_innovation/social_innovation_2013.pdfEuropean Commission2013Guide to Social InnovationRegional and Urban PolicyRetrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/social_innovation/social_innovation_2013.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Gamal, D., Salah, T. & Elrayyes, N. (2011). How to measure organization Innovativeness? An overview of Innovation measurement frameworks and Innovation Audit/Management tools. Innovation support Department. TIEC.GamalD.SalahT.ElrayyesN.2011How to measure organization Innovativeness? An overview of Innovation measurement frameworks and Innovation Audit/Management toolsInnovation support Department. TIECSearch in Google Scholar
GRI (Global Reporting Initiatives). (2006). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Version 3. Amsterdam, 2000–2006.GRI (Global Reporting Initiatives)2006Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Version 3Amsterdam20002006Search in Google Scholar
Godfrey, M. & Manikas, A. (2012). Integrating triple bottom line sustainability concepts into a supplier selection exercise. Business Education and Accreditation, 4(1), 1–12.GodfreyM.ManikasA.2012Integrating triple bottom line sustainability concepts into a supplier selection exerciseBusiness Education and Accreditation41112Search in Google Scholar
Habib, A. & Varqa, S. B. (2014). Introducing the Double Bottom Line (DBL) Measurement Approach for the Social Business Model and the Economic Valued Added (EVA) Theory as a Measure of Financial Sustainability. World Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 12–23. Retrieved from http://wjsspapers.com/static/documents/October/2014/2.%20Adnan.pdfHabibA.VarqaS. B.2014Introducing the Double Bottom Line (DBL) Measurement Approach for the Social Business Model and the Economic Valued Added (EVA) Theory as a Measure of Financial SustainabilityWorld Journal of Social Sciences431223Retrieved from http://wjsspapers.com/static/documents/October/2014/2.%20Adnan.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Higgins, C. (2001). Triple bottom line reporting: The importance of consistency. In D. Birch & J. Batten (Eds.), Paper presented to Governance and social responsibility in the new millennium, Deakin University, Burwood.HigginsC.2001Triple bottom line reporting: The importance of consistencyBirchD.BattenJ.Paper presented to Governance and social responsibility in the new millenniumDeakin University, BurwoodSearch in Google Scholar
Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Beyond the Triple Bottom Line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(3), 177–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.564HubbardG.2009Measuring Organizational Performance: Beyond the Triple Bottom LineBusiness Strategy and the Environment183177191http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.564Search in Google Scholar
Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 279–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.370KolkA.2003Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250Business Strategy and the Environment12279291http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.370Search in Google Scholar
Krlev, G., Bund, E. & Mildenberger, G. (2014). Measuring What Matters—Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National Level. Information Systems Management, 31(3), 200–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923265KrlevG.BundE.MildenbergerG.2014Measuring What Matters—Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National LevelInformation Systems Management313200224http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923265Search in Google Scholar
Mulgan, G. (2006). The Process of Social Innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145MulganG.2006The Process of Social InnovationInnovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization12145162http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145Search in Google Scholar
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. & Mulgan, G. (2009). Social Venturing. The Social Innovator Series, London: NESTA.MurrayR.Caulier-GriceJ.MulganG.2009Social VenturingThe Social Innovator Series,LondonNESTASearch in Google Scholar
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: NESTA. Retrieved from http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/Social_Innovator_020310.pdfMurrayR.Caulier-GriceJ.MulganG.2010The open book of social innovationLondonNESTARetrieved from http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/Social_Innovator_020310.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Norman, W. & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262. Retrieved from http://faculty.wwu.edu/dunnc3/rprnts.Getting%20to%20the%20Bottom%20of%20the%20Triple%20bottom%20line.pdfNormanW.MacDonaldC.2004Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line”Business Ethics Quarterly142243262Retrieved from http://faculty.wwu.edu/dunnc3/rprnts.Getting%20to%20the%20Bottom%20of%20the%20Triple%20bottom%20line.pdf10.5840/beq200414211Search in Google Scholar
Passino, K. M. & Yurkovich, S. (1998). Fuzzy Control. Addison Wesley Longman Inc. ISBN 0-01-18074-X.PassinoK. M.YurkovichS.1998Fuzzy Control.Addison Wesley Longman Inc.ISBN 0-01-18074-XSearch in Google Scholar
Phills, J. A, Deiglmeier, K. & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43. Retrieved from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovationPhillsJ. ADeiglmeierK.MillerD. T.2008Rediscovering social innovationStanford Social Innovation Review643443Retrieved from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovationSearch in Google Scholar
Reeder, N., O'Sullivan, C., Tucker, S., Ramsden P. & Mulgan, G. (2012). Strengthening Social Innovation in Europe. Journey to effective assessment and metrics (pp. 1–52). Belgium: European Union.ReederN.O'SullivanC.TuckerS.RamsdenP.MulganG.2012Strengthening Social Innovation in Europe. Journey to effective assessment and metrics152BelgiumEuropean UnionSearch in Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, W., Clark, C., Long, D. & Olsen, S. (2004). Double bottom line project: Assessing social impact in double bottom line ventures. Working paper 13, Berkeley, CA: Center for Responsible Business, University of California Berkeley.RosenzweigW.ClarkC.LongD.OlsenS.2004Double bottom line project: Assessing social impact in double bottom line venturesWorking paper 13Berkeley, CACenter for Responsible Business, University of California BerkeleySearch in Google Scholar
Savitz, A. & Weber, K. (2006). The Triple Bottom Line: how today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success- and how you can too. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.SavitzA.WeberK.2006The Triple Bottom Line: how today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success- and how you can tooSan FranciscoJossey-BassSearch in Google Scholar
Slaper, T. F. & Hall, T. J. (2011). The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4–8. Retrieved from http://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/ibr/2011/spring/pdfs/spring2011.pdfSlaperT. F.HallT. J.2011The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work?Indiana Business Review86148Retrieved from http://www.ibrc.indiana.edu/ibr/2011/spring/pdfs/spring2011.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Slater, A. & Gilbert, S. (2004). The Evolution of Business Reporting: Make Room for Sustainability Disclosure. Environmental Quality Management, 14(1), 41–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tqem.20024SlaterA.GilbertS.2004The Evolution of Business Reporting: Make Room for Sustainability DisclosureEnvironmental Quality Management1414148http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tqem.20024Search in Google Scholar
The Young Foundation. (2012). Social Innovation Overview D1.1: A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.The Young Foundation2012Social Innovation Overview D1.1: A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE)European Commission – 7th Framework Programme,BrusselsEuropean Commission, DG ResearchSearch in Google Scholar
