[Clarke, Randolph. 2009. Dispositions, abilities to act, and free will: the new dispositionalism. Mind 118: 323-351.10.1093/mind/fzp034]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fara, M. 2008. Masked abilities and compatibilism. Mind 117: 843-865.10.1093/mind/fzn078]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, Kit. 1994. Essence and modality. Philosophical Perspectives 8: 1-16.10.2307/2214160]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, John Martin and Ravizza, Mark. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814594]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, John Martin. 1994. The Metaphysics of Free Will: An Essay on Control. Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, John Martin. 1999. Recent work on moral responsibility. Ethics 110: 93-139.10.1086/233206]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fischer, John Martin. 2007. Compatibilism. In Four Views on Free Will. Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frankfurt, Harry G. 1969. Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 66: 829.10.2307/2023833]Search in Google Scholar
[Ginet, Carl. 1996. In defense of the principle of alternative possibilities: Why I don’t find Frankfurt’s argument convincing. Philosophical Perspectives 10: 403-17.10.2307/2216254]Search in Google Scholar
[Kane, Robert. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. Oxford University Press USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kane, Robert. 2003. Responsibility, indeterminism and Frankfurt-style cases: a reply to Mele and Robb. In Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities, ed. by David Widerker and Michael McKenna, Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, David. 1997. Finkish dispositions. Philosophical Quarterly 47:143-158.10.1111/1467-9213.00052]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mele, Alfred R. and Robb, David. 1998. Rescuing Frankfurt-style cases. Philosophical Review 107: 97-112.10.2307/2998316]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sartorio, Carolina. 2016. Causation and Free Will. Oxford University Press UK.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746799.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, Michael. 2003. Rational capacities, or: How to distinguish recklessness, weakness, and compulsion. In Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, ed. by Sarah Stroud and Christine Tappolet , 17-38. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199257361.003.0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Inwagen, Peter. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vetter, Barbara and Jaster, Romy. 2017. Dispositional accounts of abilities. Philosophy Compass 12.10.1111/phc3.12432]Search in Google Scholar
[Vihvelin, Kadri. 2004. Free will demystified: a dispositional account. Philosophical Topics 32: 427-450.10.5840/philtopics2004321/211]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Whittle, Ann. 2010. Dispositional abilities. Philosophers’ Imprint 10 (12).]Search in Google Scholar
[Widerker, David.1995. Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s attack on the principle of alternative possibilities. Philosophical Review 104: 247-61.10.2307/2185979]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Widerker, David. 2003. Blameworthiness and Frankfurt’s argument against the principle of alternative possibilities. In Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities, ed. by David Widerker and Michael McKenna, Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar