Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Overcoming Impasses in Conversations: A Creative Business


Zitieren

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357Search in Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Beeftink, F., Van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2008). The effect of interruptions and breaks on insight and impasses: do you need a break right now? Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 358-364.10.1080/10400410802391314Search in Google Scholar

Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd edition). Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: doing Phonetics by computer.Search in Google Scholar

Bowden, E. M. & Jung-Beeman, M. (2006). Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods, 42, 87-99. doi:doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.11.00710.1016/j.ymeth.2006.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Canavan, A., Graff, D., & Zipperlen, G. (1997). Callhome American English speech. Linguistic Data Consortium.Search in Google Scholar

Chambliss, C. A. & Feeny, N. (1992). Effects of sex of subject, sex of interrupter, and topic of conversation on the perceptions of interruptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(3f), 1235-1241.10.2466/pms.1992.75.3f.1235Search in Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Search in Google Scholar

Cranford, E. A. & Moss, J. (2012). Is insight always the same? a protocol analysis of insight in compound remote associative problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4. doi:10.7771/1932-6246.112910.7771/1932-6246.1129Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, F., Li, C., & Wang, B. (2013). Coupling among speakers during synchronous speaking in English and Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 432-441.10.1016/j.wocn.2013.07.001Search in Google Scholar

de Jong, N. H. & Wempe, T. (2009, May). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385-390. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.2.38510.3758/BRM.41.2.385Search in Google Scholar

Demuth, C. & Glaveanu, V. P. (2016). Creativity - A New Vocabulary. In V. P. Glaveanu, L. Tanggaard, & C. Wegener (Eds.), (Chap. Language, pp. 52-60). Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/978113751180510.1057/9781137511805Search in Google Scholar

Donaldson, S. K. (1979). One kind of speech act: How do we know when we’re conversing? Semiotica, 28(3-4), 259-300.10.1515/semi.1979.28.3-4.259Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63, 482-512. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.01410.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014Search in Google Scholar

Fleck, J. I. & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 436-463. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.77924810.1080/20445911.2013.779248Search in Google Scholar

Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611-625. doi:10.1348/096317907X17342110.1348/096317907X173421Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 377-388.10.2307/2182440Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Syntax and semantics: Speech acts Volume 3. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), (Chap. Logic and conversation. pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational Fluency as a Confounding Factor in the Measurement of Originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 191-196.10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191Search in Google Scholar

Howard, T., Culley, S., & Dekoninck, E. (2007). Creativity in the Engineering Design Process. In International conference of engineering design.Search in Google Scholar

Jacewicz, E., Fox, R. A., O’Neill, C., & Salmons, J. (2009, July). Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change, 21(02), 233-256. doi:10.1017/s095439450999009310.1017/S0954394509990093Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004). Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), (Chap. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction, pp. 13-31). John Benjamins Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Jordan, M. E., Lanham, H. J., Crabtree, B. F., Nutting, P. A., Miller, W. L., Stange, K. C., & McDaniel, R. R. (2009). The role of conversation in health care interventions: Enabling sensemaking and learning. Implement Sci, 4(15), 1-13.10.1186/1748-5908-4-15Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, M. A. (1997). Learning to converse in a foreign language: The reception game. Simulation & Gaming, 28(2), 149-163.10.1177/1046878197282001Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Do people recognize the four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229-236. doi:10.1037/a003329510.1037/a0033295Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, G. H. (2004). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.125Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. (2007). The Talkbank Project. In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora (pp. 163-180). Springer.10.1057/9780230223936_7Search in Google Scholar

McCarthy, M. (2001). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. In D. Nunan & R. Carter (Eds.), (Chap. Discourse, pp. 48-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2011). The effect of incidental hints when problems are suspended before, during, or after an impasse. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37(1), 140-148. doi:10.1037/a002120610.1037/a0021206Search in Google Scholar

Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511780295Search in Google Scholar

Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2014). The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the ninedot problem. Psychological Research, 78(2), 266-275.10.1007/s00426-013-0494-8Search in Google Scholar

Park, I. (2010). Marking an impasse: The use of anyway as a sequence-closing device. Journal of Pragmatics, 42. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.00210.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Reed, S. K. (2015). The Structure of Ill-Structured (and Well-Structured) Problems Revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 1-26. doi:10.1007/s10648-0159343-1Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.65009210.1080/10400419.2012.650092Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I and II (G. Jefferson, Ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language, 696-735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010Search in Google Scholar

Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E., & Beeman, M. (2016). Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Thinking & Reasoning. doi:10.1080/13546783.2016.114179810.1080/13546783.2016.1141798Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Selting, M. (1996). On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics, 6, 371-388.10.1075/prag.6.3.06selSearch in Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., ... Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68-85. doi:doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.6810.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1973). The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201.10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8Search in Google Scholar

Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and Culture. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 36(2), 311-322. doi:10.1080/00223980.1953.971289710.1080/00223980.1953.9712897Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., ... Yoon, K.-E., et al. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587-10592.10.1073/pnas.0903616106Search in Google Scholar

Wallach, M. A. & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children. A Study of the Creativity-Intelligence distinction. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. Jonathan Cape London.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, M. (2006). Features of Naturalness in Conversation. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. John Benjamins Publishing. doi:10.1075/pbns.15210.1075/pbns.152Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, R. W. (2015). Toward an integrated theory of insight in problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 5-39. doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.88662510.1080/13546783.2014.886625Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2354-0036
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Kunst, allgemein, Sozialwissenschaften, Psychologie, Entwicklungspsychologie, Angewandte Psychologie, Pädagogik, andere