Non-Territorial Spaces of Belarusian Political Nomadism

1. Amnesty International. “Belarus: What Is Not Permitted Is Prohibited: Silencing Civil Society in Belarus” (May 15, 2013): 1–5 // https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/12000/eur490062013en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. Appadurai, Arjun. Modernity at Large. Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Vol. 1. Public Worlds. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

3. Chulitskaya, Tatsiana. “Belarusian NGOs and the West: A Way Forward.” Bell BelarusInfo Letter (2013).Search in Google Scholar

4. Civil Society. Dialogue for Progress. Belarus Civil Society Organisations in Cross-Sectoral Dialogue: Experts Survey. Minsk: Civil Society, Dialogue for Progress, 2014 // http://www.csdialogue.eu/news/belarus-civil-society-organisations-cross-sectoral-dialogue-experts-survey.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dahinden, Janine. “Are We All Transnationals Now? Network Transnationalism and Transnational Subjectivity: The Differing Impacts of Globalization on the Inhabitants of a Small Swiss City.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 32, No. 8 (2009): 1365–1386 // doi:10.1080/01419870802506534.10.1080/01419870802506534Search in Google Scholar

6. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Penguin Group (USA) Incorporated, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

7. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

8. Florini, Ann, and P. J. Simmons. “What the World Needs Now?”: 1-15. In: Ann Florini, ed. The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

9. Georgiou, Myria. “Between Strategic Nostalgia and Banal Nomadism: Explorations of Transnational Subjectivity among Arab Audiences.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 16, No. 1 (2012): 23–39 // doi:10.1177/1367877912441429.10.1177/1367877912441429Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Hill, Ronald J. “Post-Soviet Belarus: In Search of Direction”: 1–16. In: Stephen White, Elena Korosteleva, and John Löwenhardt, eds. Postcommunist Belarus. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

11. Hoad, Terry, “Definition of Political”: 360 In: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Paw Prints, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

12. Holland, Eugene W. Nomad Citizenship: Free-Market Communism and the Slow-Motion General Strike. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.10.5749/minnesota/9780816666126.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

13. Human Rights Watch. “World Report 2015: Belarus” (January 29, 2015) // https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chapters/belarus.Search in Google Scholar

14. ICNL. “Belarus - NGO Law Monitor - Research Center – ICNL” (2015) // http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/belarus.html.Search in Google Scholar

15. Kaldor, Mary. “The Idea of Global Civil Society.” International Affairs 79, No. 3 (2014): 583–593.10.1111/1468-2346.00324Search in Google Scholar

16. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics.” International Social Science Journal 51, No. 159 (1999): 89–101 // doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00179.10.1111/1468-2451.00179Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Kennedy, Paul, and Victor Roudometof. “Transnationalism in a Global Age”: 1–23. In: Paul Kennedy and Victor Roudometof, eds. Communities Across Borders: New Immigrants and Transnational Culture. Taylor & Francis, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

18. Korosteleva, Elena. “The Emergence of a Party System”: 35–58. In: Stephen White, Elena Korosteleva, and John Löwenhardt, eds. Postcommunist Belarus. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kvale, Steinar. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. 1^st ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Inc., 1996.Search in Google Scholar

20. Law, John. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

21. Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Norman K. Denzin. Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief. Rowman Altamira, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

22. Lyotard, Jean François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

23. Matchanka, Anastasiya. “Substitution of Civil Society in Belarus: Government-Organised Non-Governmental Organisations.” Journal of Belarusian Studies 7, No. 2 (2014): 67–94.10.30965/20526512-00702004Search in Google Scholar

24. Mendelson, Sarah E., and John K. Glenn. “Introduction: Transnational Networks and NGOs in Postcommunist Societies”: 1–28. In: Sarah E. Mendelson and John K. Glenn, eds. The Power and Limits of NGOs. Columbia University Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

25. [No author named]. “Definition of Political.” Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary // http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/political.Search in Google Scholar

26. [No author named]. “Definition of Transnational.” Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary // http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transnational.Search in Google Scholar

27. Ouyang, Jessica, and Kathleen McKeown. “Modelling Reportable Events as Turning Points in Narrative”: 2149–2158. In: 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Lisbon, Portugal: 2015 Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

28. Padbiarozkin, Maxim. “The Development of NGOs in Belarus.” The BEARR Trust Newsletter No. 58 (2012): 13–14 // http://www.bearr.org/pdfs/bearrnews_no58_WEB.pdf.10.4324/9780203349502-4Search in Google Scholar

29. Papastergiadis, Nikos. The Turbulence of Migration: Globalization, Deterritorialization and Hybridity. Wiley, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

30. Porta, Donatella Della, and Sidney G. Tarrow. Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

31. Purcell, Mark. “Rancière and Revolution.” Space and Polity 18, No. 2 (2014): 168–181 // doi:10.1080/13562576.2014.911591.10.1080/13562576.2014.911591Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Rancière, Jacques. Dis-Agreement. Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

33. Rancière, Jacques. Dissensus. On Politics and Aesthetics. Edited by Steven Corcoran. London and New York: Continuum, 2010.10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001Search in Google Scholar

34. Rancière, Jacques. On the Shores of Politics. Verso, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

35. Rancière, Jacques, David Panagia and Rachel Bowlby. “Ten Theses on Politics.” Theory & Event 5, No. 3 (2001) // doi:10.1353/tae.2001.0028.10.1353/tae.2001.0028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Rasolka, Ihar. “Politisation of Civil Society in an Apolitical Society: Paternalism, Deconsolidation and Action Strategies of Social Agents”: 61–66. In: Civil Society in Belarus 2000–2015. Collection of Texts. Warsaw: East European Democratic Centre, 2015 // http://issuu.com/eedc_warsaw/docs/final_civil_society_in_belarus_inte_5d21802f640249/3?e=5048453/14443508.Search in Google Scholar

37. Sassen, Saskia. “Spatialities and Temporalities of the Global: Elements for a Theorization.” Public Culture 12, No. 1 (2000): 215–232 // doi:10.1215/08992363-12-1-215.10.1215/08992363-12-1-215Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. Silitski, Vitali. “Contagion Deterred: Preemtive Authoritarianism in the Former Soviet Union (the Case of Belarus)”: 275-299. In: Valerie Bunce, Michael McFaul, and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss, eds. Democracy and Authoritarianism in the Postcommunist World. 1^st ed. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

39. Smith, Graham, Vivien Law, Andrew Wilson, Annette Bohr, and Edward Allworth. Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet Borderlands: The Politics of National Identities. Cambridge (England), New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.10.1017/CBO9780511598876Search in Google Scholar

40. Tonkacheva, Elena. “Non-Profit Organisations in the Republic of Belarus. Legislative Regulation and Issues of Law Application”: 90-99. In: Belarus – the third sector. Minsk-Warsaw: Wschodnioeuropejskie Centrum Demokratyczne, 2002 // http://bzh.kamunikat.org/download.php?item=1972-16.pdf&pubref=1972.Search in Google Scholar

41. United Nations. Environmental Performance Reviews: Belarus ECE/CEP/129. United Nations Publications, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

42. Venice Commission, Council of Europe. “Opinion on the Compatibility with Universal Human Rights Standards of Article 193-1 of the Criminal Code on the Rights of Non-Registered Associations of the Republic of Belarus Adopted by the Venice Commission at Its 88th Plenary Session (Venice, 14-15 October 2011)” (2011) // http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2011)036-e.Search in Google Scholar

43. Webster, Leonard, and Patricie Mertova. Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method: An Introduction to Using Critical Event Narrative Analysis in Research on Learning Teaching. 1^st ed. London, New York: Routledge, 2007.10.4324/9780203946268Search in Google Scholar

44. White, Stephen, and Ian McAllister. “Patterns of Political Culture”: 17–34. In: Stephen White, Elena Korosteleva, and John Lowenhardt, eds. Postcommnist Belarus. United States of America: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005.Search in Google Scholar