A Step Forward in the Harmonization of European Jurisdiction: Regulation Brussels I Recast

1. Baumgartner, Samuel P. “Recent Reforms in EU Law. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments.” Judicature 97 (2014): 188–195.Search in Google Scholar

2. Baumgartner, Samuel P. The Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments. Tübingen: Gulde-Druck, 2003 // http://ssrn.com/abstract=719542.Search in Google Scholar

3. Cook, Justin P. “Pragmatism in the European Union: Recasting the Brussels I Regulation to Ensure the Effectiveness of Exclusive Choice-of-Court Agreements.” Aberdeen Student Law Review 4 (2013): 76–91.Search in Google Scholar

4. Cuniberti, Gilles, and Isabelle Rueda. “Abolition of Exequatur. Addressing the Commission’s Concerns.” University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper No. 2010-03 (2010) // http://ssrn.com/abstract=1691001.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dickinson, Andrew, and Eva Lein. The Brussels I Regulation Recast. Oxford University Press, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

6. Dixon, Martin. Textbook on international Law. 7^th ed. Oxford University Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

7. Foster, Nigel. Foster on EU Law. 4^th ed. Oxford University Press, 2013.10.1093/he/9780199670796.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

8. Ivanova, Ekaterina. “Choice of Court Clauses and Lis Pendens under Brussels I Regulation.” Merkourios-Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 26 (2009-2010): 12–16.10.5334/ujiel.abSearch in Google Scholar

9. Kenny, David, and Rosemary Hennigan. “Choice-of-Court Agreements, the Italian Torpedo, and the Recast of the Brussels I Regulation.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 64 (2015): 197–209.10.1017/S0020589314000621Search in Google Scholar

10. Kuipers, Jan-Jaap. “Party Autonomy in the Brussels I Regulation and Rome I Regulation and the European Court of Justice.” German Law Journal 10 (2009): 1505–1524.10.1017/S2071832200018356Search in Google Scholar

11. Michaels, Ralf. “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”: 1–13. In: Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (MPEPIL) (Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg and Oxford University Press, 2009) // http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1848?rskey=hO56Qj&result=1&prd=EPIL.Search in Google Scholar

12. Moses, Margaret. “Arbitration/Litigation Interface: The European Debate.” Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 35 (2014): 1–47.Search in Google Scholar

13. Nielsen, Peter A. “The State of Play of the Recast of the Brussels I Regulation.” Nordic Journal of International Law 81 (2012): 585–603.Search in Google Scholar

14. Stone, Peter. EU Private International Law: Harmonization of Laws. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.10.4337/9781847201836Search in Google Scholar

15. Timmer, Laurens J. “Abolition of Exequatur under the Brussels I Regulation: ILL Conceived and Premature?” Journal of Private International Law 9 (2013): 129–147.10.5235/17441048.9.1.129Search in Google Scholar

1. Allianz SpA v. West Tankers, Inc. Court of Justice of the European Union. 2009, C-185/07.Search in Google Scholar

2. Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters 1968. OJ L 299, 31/12/1972, p. 0032.Search in Google Scholar

3. Comments on the Brussels I Regulation on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters // http://dutchcivillaw.com/content/brusselsone000.htm.Search in Google Scholar

4. Commission Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. COM (1999) 348 final.Search in Google Scholar

5. Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Recast). COM (2010) 748 final. Brussels, December 17, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

6. Council Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 of May 29, 2000, on insolvency proceedings. OJ L 160, p. 1.Search in Google Scholar

7. Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 on jurisdiction and enforcement of judgements in civil and commercial matters. OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.Search in Google Scholar

8. Erich Gasser GmbH v. MISAT Srl. European Court of Justice. 2003, C-116/02.Search in Google Scholar

9. France v. Turkey. Permanent Court of International Justice [PCIJ]. 1927, PCIJ Series A no 10, ICGJ 248.Search in Google Scholar

10. Jenard Report on the Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. OJ 5.3.79 No. 59/1. Brussels, September 27, 1968.Search in Google Scholar

11. Marc Rich & Co. AG v. SocietaA Italiana Impianti PA. Court of Justice of the European Communities. 1991, C-190/89.Search in Google Scholar

12. Regulation 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast). OJ L351, p. 1.Search in Google Scholar

13. Regulation 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council of December 12, 2006, creating a European order for payment procedure. OJ L 399, p. 1.Search in Google Scholar

14. Regulation 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims. OJ L 143, p. 15.Search in Google Scholar

15. Regulation 861/2007 of the European Parliament and the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure. OJ L 199, p. 1.Search in Google Scholar

16. The Tatry v. Maciej Rataj. European Court of Justice. 1994, C-406/92.Search in Google Scholar

17. Websense International Technology Limited v. ITWAY SpA. Irish Supreme Court. 2014, IESC 5.Search in Google Scholar