<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>The article focuses on the right to be forgotten, which is at the center of changes in the concept of human rights in the digital age. The origins of the right to be forgotten in European legal doctrine and judicial practice, as well as its relationship with autonomy and identity, are analyzed. The article also examines the significance of the new understanding of “time” and “data” for the adoption of this right, considering the influence of two key cases of the Court of Justice of the European Union, such as <italic>Google v. Spain</italic> [2014] and <italic>Google v. CNIL</italic> [2019] on the concept of the right to be forgotten. The place of this right, its connection with privacy and European data protection law is debated. The article focuses on jurisdictional issues, paying particular attention to both the right to be forgotten and the understanding of the relationship between privacy a nd freedom of expression in the European Union and the United States, and possible jurisdictional disputes around the world. The article also addresses the issue of balancing rights and legitimate interests, as well as the proportionality for applying the right to be forgotten, both in the European and global contexts.</p>
</abstract>

The article focuses on the right to be forgotten, which is at the center of changes in the concept of human rights in the digital age. The origins of the right to be forgotten in European legal doctrine and judicial practice, as well as its relationship with autonomy and identity, are analyzed. The article also examines the significance of the new understanding of “time” and “data” for the adoption of this right, considering the influence of two key cases of the Court of Justice of the European Union, such as Google v. Spain [2014] and Google v. CNIL [2019] on the concept of the right to be forgotten. The place of this right, its connection with privacy and European data protection law is debated. The article focuses on jurisdictional issues, paying particular attention to both the right to be forgotten and the understanding of the relationship between privacy a nd freedom of expression in the European Union and the United States, and possible jurisdictional disputes around the world. The article also addresses the issue of balancing rights and legitimate interests, as well as the proportionality for applying the right to be forgotten, both in the European and global contexts.

The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Perspective

Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law

TalTech Journal of European Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Perspective"}

The article focuses on the right to be forgotten, which is at the center of changes in the concept of human rights in the digital age. The origins of the right...

The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Perspective

Online veröffentlicht: 17. Juni 2020

Seitenbereich: 58 - 76

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0004

Schlüsselwörter
balancing rights, digital age, European data protection law, GDPR, human rights, information technologies, proportionality, right to be forgotten

© 2020 Yulia Razmetaeva, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Perspective

Online veröffentlicht: 17. Juni 2020

Seitenbereich: 58 - 76

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0004

Schlüsselwörterbalancing rights, digital age, European data protection law, GDPR, human rights, information technologies, proportionality, right to be forgotten

© 2020 Yulia Razmetaeva, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
balancing rights, digital age, European data protection law, GDPR, human rights, information technologies, proportionality, right to be forgotten