Links Between Surgical Landmarks of the Temporal Bone and Cochlear Implant Approaches

1. Bishop CE, Eby TL. The current status of audiologic rehabilitation for profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:552-556.10.1002/lary.20735Search in Google Scholar

2. Brito RD, Bittencourt AG, Tsuji RK, Magnan J, Bento RF. Cochlear implantation through the middle fossa: an anatomic study for a novel technique. Acta Otolaryngol. 2013;133(9):905-909.10.3109/00016489.2013.795291Search in Google Scholar

3. Handzel O, Wang H, Fiering J, et al. Mastoid cavity dimensions and shape: method of measurement and virtual fitting of implantable devices. Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(5):308-314.10.1159/000212110Search in Google Scholar

4. Todd NW. Cochlear implantation via the middle fossa: surgical and electrode array considerations. Cochlear Implants Int. 2007;8(1):12-28.10.1179/cim.2007.8.1.12Search in Google Scholar

5. Seo Y, Ito T, Sasaki T, Nakagawara J, Nakamura H. Assessment of the anatomical relationship between the arcuate eminence and superior semicircular canal by computed tomography. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2007;47(8):335-339; discussion 339-340.10.2176/nmc.47.335Search in Google Scholar

6. Cömert E, Cömert A, Cay N, Tunçel U, Tekdemir I. Surgical Anatomy of the Infralabyrinthine Approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(2):301-307.10.1177/0194599814527725Search in Google Scholar

7. Mukherjee P, Uzun-Coruhlu H, Curthoys IS, Jones AS, Bradshaw AP, Pohl DV. Three-dimensional analysis of the vestibular end organs in relation to the stapes footplate and piston placement. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(3):367-372.10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182096dddSearch in Google Scholar

8. Richard C, Laroche N, Malaval L, et al. New insight into the bony labyrinth: a microcomputed tomography study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010;37(2):155-161.10.1016/j.anl.2009.04.014Search in Google Scholar

9. Connor SE, Bell DJ, O’Gorman R, Fitzgerald-O’Connor A. CT and MR imaging cochlear distance measurements may predict cochlear implant length required for a 360 degrees insertion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(7):1425-1430.10.3174/ajnr.A1571Search in Google Scholar

10. Memari F, Tabatabaee RM, Borghei Razavi H, Fereshtehnejad SM, Daneshi A. Transpetrosal approach: an anatomical study of temporal bone. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(9):1373-1380.10.1007/s00405-009-0928-5Search in Google Scholar

11. Wysocki J, Skarzyñski H. Distances between the cochlea and adjacent structures related to cochlear implant surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20(4):267-271.10.1007/BF01628488Search in Google Scholar

12. Stjernholm C. Aspects of temporal bone anatomy and pathology in conjunction with cochlear implant surgery. Acta Radiol Suppl. 2003;430:2-15.10.1034/j.1600-0455.44.s430.1.xSearch in Google Scholar

13. Atturo F, Barbara M, Rask-Andersen H. On the Anatomy of the ‘Hook’ Region of the Human Cochlea and How It Relates to Cochlear Implantation. Audiol Neurootol. 2014 Nov 4;19(6):378-385.10.1159/000365585Search in Google Scholar

14. Choi BJ, Kim MJ, Chang KH, Yeo SW, Jun BC. Three-dimensional Anatomical Analysis of Surgical Landmarks for the Middle Cranial Fossa Approach. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66(3):320-324.10.1007/s12070-014-0719-1Search in Google Scholar

15. Singla A, Sahni D, Gupta AK, Loukas M, Aggarwal A. Surgical anatomy of round window and its implications for cochlear implantation. Clin Anat. 2014;27(3):331-336.10.1002/ca.22339Search in Google Scholar

16. Yamanaka T, Pyle GM, Hosoi H. Transmastoid approach to the superior semicircular canal: An anatomical study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41(2):169-171.10.1016/j.anl.2013.08.006Search in Google Scholar

17. Salma A1, Makiese O, Reiss A, Pillai P, Sammet S, Ammirati M. A microanatomical map of the structures hidden in the middle fossa based on the facial nerve hiatus: measurements and their variability. Clin Anat. 2013;26(4):436-443.10.1002/ca.22082Search in Google Scholar

18. Bogar M, Bento RF, Tsuji RK. Cochlear anatomy study used to design surgical instruments for cochlear implants with two bundles of electrodes in ossified cochleas. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74 (2):194-199.10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31088-0Search in Google Scholar