The Donation of Gametes and the Anonimity of the Donors

1. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law III Gamete and embryo donation - Human Reproduction, 2002; 17(5): 1407-1408.10.1093/humrep/17.5.140711980773Search in Google Scholar

2. McWhinnie A. Gamete donation and anonymity, Hum Reprod, 2001; 16(5): 807-817.Search in Google Scholar

3. Hill M (2002) Sperm donors “want to keep anonymity”. BBC News. Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2329675.stmSearch in Google Scholar

4. Brett S, Sacranie RR, Thomas GE, and Rajkhowa R. Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2008; 11: 101-107.10.1080/1464727080195310918569065Search in Google Scholar

5. Janssens P. M. W, Simons A. H. M, van Kooij R. J, Blokzijl E, and Dunselman G. A. J. A new Dutch Law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact. Hum. Reprod, 2006; 21(4): 852-856.Search in Google Scholar

6. Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R, and Golombok S. School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents’ disclosure patterns. Hum. Reprod., 2005; 20(3): 810-819.Search in Google Scholar

7. Krastev R, Mitev V. Law and bioethics of the assisted reproduction in the European Union, Sofia, ed. Iztok-Zapad, 2014, p.29.Search in Google Scholar

8. Daniels K, and Lalos O. The Swedish Insemination Act and the availability of donors. Hum. Reprod, 1995; 12: 1871-1874.Search in Google Scholar

9. Fichou K. (AFP) (Oct 8, 2011) Sperm donors father huge “families” in US, Canada Available at www.google.com/.../afp/.../ALeqM5jT8W3P_gpVoAZi1l6ShG5zH1...Search in Google Scholar

10. Pennings, G., The “double track” policy for donor anonymity. Hum. Reprod., 1997; 12; 2839-2844.10.1093/humrep/12.12.28399455865Search in Google Scholar

11. Frith, L, Blyth, E., Farrand, A., UK gamete donors’ reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitement. Hum. Reprod, 2007; 22(6): 1675-1680.Search in Google Scholar

12. Skoog Svanberg, A., Lampic, C., Bergh, T., Lundkvist, Ö. Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Sweden. Human Reproduction 2003a; 18(5): 1107-1114.10.1093/humrep/deg22212721192Search in Google Scholar

13. Skoog Svanberg, A., Lampic, C., Bergh, T., Lundkvist, Ö. Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden. Human Reproduction 2003b; 18(10):2210-2215.10.1093/humrep/deg39814507845Search in Google Scholar

14. Isaksson, S., Skoog Svanberg, A., Sydsjö, G., Thurin-Kjellberg, A., Karlström, P. O., Solensten, N.-G., Lampic, C. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation? Human Reproduction 2011; 26(.4): 853-860.10.1093/humrep/deq36521212053Search in Google Scholar

15. Minai, J., Suzuki, K., Takeda, Y., Hoshi, K., Yamagata, Z. There are gender differences in attitudes towards surrogacy when information on this technique is provided. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2007; 132: 193-199.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.01617046144Search in Google Scholar

16. http://www.ipsos.com/interviewsSearch in Google Scholar

17. http://www.doctissimo.fr/html/dossiers/genetique/14922-enquete-la-bioethique-et-vousSearch in Google Scholar

18. De la Fuente Fonnest I., Finn Søndergaard, Gert Fonnest and Agnette Vedsted-Jacobsen, Attitudes among health care professionals on the ethics of assisted reproductive technologies and legal abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2000; 79: 49-53.Search in Google Scholar

19. Papaharitou S, Nakopoulou E., Moraitou M., Hatzimouratidis K. and Hatzichristou D. Reproductive health and midwives: Does occupational status differentiate their attitudes on assisted reproduction technologies from those of the general population? Human Reproduction 2007; 22(7): 2033-2039.Search in Google Scholar

20. YouGov Assisted Reproduction Survey On behalf of Progress Educational Trust Summ ary report, www.YouGov.com novembre 2006.Search in Google Scholar

21. Brewaeys, A., De Bruyn, J. K., Louwe, L. A., Helmerhorst, F. M. Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients’ choices. Hum. Reprod, 2005; 20(3): 820-824. Search in Google Scholar