Learning lessons from local social/poverty impact assessment

Adelle, C., & Weiland, S. (2012). Policy assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30 (1), 25–33.10.1080/14615517.2012.663256Search in Google Scholar

American Political Science Association. (2004). American democracy in an age of rising inequality. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Search in Google Scholar

Burdge, R. J. (2003). The practice of social impact assessment background. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21 (2), 84–8.10.3152/147154603781766356Search in Google Scholar

Dáil Éireann. (2017). Poverty impact assessment. 9 March. Dáil Debates, 942 (2).Search in Google Scholar

Department of Social Protection. (2016). Poverty impact assessment (PIA) – Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from https://www.welfare.ie/en/Pages/Poverty-Impact-Assesment-(PIA)—-Frequently-Asked-Questions.aspx [15 February 2017].Search in Google Scholar

Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. (2015). Guidelines on local economic and community plans. Dublin: Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government.Search in Google Scholar

Esteves, A. M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30 (1), 34–42.10.1080/14615517.2012.660356Search in Google Scholar

Finn, C. (2017). Deepening participation, deepening local democracy? The state of local participatory governance in Ireland. Unpublished PhD, University of Limerick.Search in Google Scholar

Government of Ireland. (2000). Programme for prosperity and fairness. Dublin: The Stationery Office.Search in Google Scholar

Kemp, D., & Vanclay, F. (2013). Human rights and impact assessment: Clarifying the connections in practice. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31 (2), 86–96.10.1080/14615517.2013.782978Search in Google Scholar

Levitas, R. (2004). Lets hear it for humpty: Social exclusion, the third way and cultural capital. Cultural Trends, 13 (50), 41–56.10.1080/0954896042000267143Search in Google Scholar

Lockie, S. (2001). SIA in review: Setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19 (4), 277–87.10.3152/147154601781766952Search in Google Scholar

MacNaughton, G. (2015). Human rights impact assessment: A method for healthy policymaking. Health and Human Rights, 17 (1), 63–75.10.2307/healhumarigh.17.1.63Search in Google Scholar

Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Gunn, J. A. E., Bond, A., & Retief, F. (2014). Strengthening impact assessment: A call for integration and focus. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32 (1), 2–8.10.1080/14615517.2013.872841Search in Google Scholar

Newcastle City Council. (2017). Budget 2017–18: Investing for a fairer future. Retrieved from https://www.newcastle.gov.uk/your-council-anddemocracy/budget-annual-report-and-spending/budget/budget-2017-18 [4 July 2017].Search in Google Scholar

O’Connor, S. (2001). Review of the poverty proofing process. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.Search in Google Scholar

Pops, G. M., & Pavlak, T. J. (1991). The case for justice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Sean O’Riordain and Associates. (2011). Final report on the poverty impact assessment support programme for local authority social inclusion units. Dublin: Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.Search in Google Scholar

Stears, M. (2012). The case for a state that supports relationships, not a relational state. In G. Cooke & R. Muir (Eds), The relational state: How recognising the importance of human relationships could revolutionise the role of the state. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Search in Google Scholar

The World Bank. (2003). A user’s guide to poverty and social impact analysis. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

Vanclay, F. (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21 (1), 5–12.10.3152/147154603781766491Search in Google Scholar