This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Meislin MA, Wagner ER, Shin AY. A comparison of elbow range of motion measurements: Smartphone-based digital photography versus goniometric measurements. J. Hand Surg. 2016; 41: 510–5.e1.MeislinMAWagnerERShinAYA comparison of elbow range of motion measurements: Smartphone-based digital photography versus goniometric measurements2016415105.e110.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.00626880499Search in Google Scholar
Chapleau J, Canet F, Petit Y, Laflamme GY, Rouleau DM. Validity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469:3134–40.ChapleauJCanetFPetitYLaflammeGYRouleauDMValidity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method201146931344010.1007/s11999-011-1986-8318317721779866Search in Google Scholar
van Rijn SF, Zwerus EL, Koenraadt KL, Jacobs WC, van den Bekerom MP, Eygendaal D. The reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: a systematic review of the literature. Shoulder Elbow. 2018; 10:274–84.van RijnSFZwerusELKoenraadtKLJacobsWCvan den BekeromMPEygendaalDThe reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: a systematic review of the literature2018102748410.1177/1758573218774326613453530214494Search in Google Scholar
Russo RR, Burn MB, Ismaily SK, Gerrie BJ, Han S, Alexander J, et al. Is digital photography an accurate and precise method for measuring range of motion of the shoulder and elbow? J Orthop Sci. 2018; 23:310–5.RussoRRBurnMBIsmailySKGerrieBJHanSAlexanderJIs digital photography an accurate and precise method for measuring range of motion of the shoulder and elbow?201823310510.1016/j.jos.2017.11.01629274738Search in Google Scholar
Chanlalit C, Kongmalai P. Validation of the telemedicine-based goniometry for measuring elbow range of motion. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012; 95(Suppl 12):S113–7.ChanlalitCKongmalaiPValidation of the telemedicine-based goniometry for measuring elbow range of motion201295Suppl 12S1137Search in Google Scholar
Crasto JA, Sayari AJ, Gray RR, Askari M. Comparative analysis of photograph-based clinical goniometry to standard techniques. Hand (N Y). 2015; 10:248–53.CrastoJASayariAJGrayRRAskariMComparative analysis of photograph-based clinical goniometry to standard techniques2015102485310.1007/s11552-014-9702-2444768626034439Search in Google Scholar
Blonna D, Zarkadas PC, Fitzsimmons JS, O’Driscoll SW. Validation of a photography-based goniometry method for measuring joint range of motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21:29–35.BlonnaDZarkadasPCFitzsimmonsJSO’DriscollSWValidation of a photography-based goniometry method for measuring joint range of motion201221293510.1016/j.jse.2011.06.01821983191Search in Google Scholar
Keijsers R, Zwerus EL, van Lith DRM, Koenraadt KLM, Goossens P, The B, et al. Validity and reliability of elbow range of motion measurements using digital photographs, movies, and a goniometry smartphone application. J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp). 2018; 2018:7906875.KeijsersRZwerusELvan LithDRMKoenraadtKLMGoossensPTheBValidity and reliability of elbow range of motion measurements using digital photographs, movies, and a goniometry smartphone application20182018790687510.1155/2018/7906875630459030631776Search in Google Scholar
Gerhardt J, Cocchiarella L, Lea R. The practical guide to range of motion assessment. 1st ed. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2002.GerhardtJCocchiarellaLLeaR1st edChicagoAmerican Medical Association2002Search in Google Scholar
Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1986; 6:679–98.CannyJA computational approach to edge detection198666799810.1016/B978-0-08-051581-6.50024-6Search in Google Scholar
Duda RO, Hart PE. Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun ACM. 1972; 15:11–5.DudaROHartPEUse of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures19721511510.1145/361237.361242Search in Google Scholar
Pedregosa F, Gaël V, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011; 12:2825–30.PedregosaFGaëlVGramfortAMichelVThirionBGriselOScikit-learn: machine learning in Python201112282530Search in Google Scholar
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15:155–63.KooTKLiMYA guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research2016151556310.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012491311827330520Search in Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. 2019.R Core TeamVienna, Austria2019Search in Google Scholar
Datta D. blandr: a Bland-Altman method comparison package for R. 2017.DattaD2017Search in Google Scholar