Effect of distraction task on driving performance of experienced taxi drivers

[1]Anttila V, Luoma J. Surrogate in-vehicle information system and driver behaviour in an urban environment: a field study on the effects of visual and cognitive load. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2005; 8:121–33.10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.007AnttilaVLuomaJ.Surrogate in-vehicle information system and driver behaviour in an urban environment: a field study on the effects of visual and cognitive loadTransp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav.2005812133Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2]Lee YT, Kim MH, Son JW. Effects of advancing age on driver’s cognitive workload. Ergon Soc Korea. 2009; 28:73–9.10.5143/JESK.2009.28.3.073LeeYTKimMHSonJW.Effects of advancing age on driver’s cognitive workloadErgon Soc Korea.200928739Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3]Lee WS, Park JW, Kim SJ, Yoon SH, Yang X, Lee YT, et al. Development of an analysis system for biosignal and driving performance measurements. Ergon Soc Korea. 2010; 29:47–53.10.5143/JESK.2010.29.1.047LeeWSParkJWKimSJYoonSHYangXLeeYTDevelopment of an analysis system for biosignal and driving performance measurementsErgon Soc Korea.2010294753Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4]Ascone D, Lindsey T, Varghese C. An examination of driver distraction as recorded in NHTSA databases. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT [on line]. 2009 Sep. (No. HS-811 216), Available from: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811216.pdf. Accessed January 2017.AsconeDLindseyTVargheseC.An examination of driver distraction as recorded in NHTSA databasesNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT [on line]2009Sep.(No. HS-811 216), Available fromhttp://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811216.pdfAccessed January 2017Search in Google Scholar

[5]Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Neale VL, Petersen A, Lee SE, Sudweeks JD, et al. The 100-car naturalistic driving study: phase II-Results of the 100-car field experiment. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT [on line]. 2006 Apr. (No. HS-810 593) Available from: http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash%20Avoidance/Driver%20Distraction/100CarMain.pdf. Accessed January 2017.DingusTAKlauerSGNealeVLPetersenALeeSESudweeksJDThe 100-car naturalistic driving study: phase II-Results of the 100-car field experimentNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT [on line]. 2006 Apr. (No. HS-810 593) Available fromhttp://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/MuUimedia/PDFs/Crash%20Avoidance/Driver%20Distraction/100CarMain.pdfAccessed January 201710.1037/e624282011-001Search in Google Scholar

[6]Neale VL, Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Sudweeks J, Goodman M. An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings (05-0400). Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; 2005 June 6–9, 2005; Washington DC, USA. Available from: http://www.dot.alaska.gov/highwaysafety/assets/Occ_Prot-cellphone_National_study-Virginia_Tech_Transp_Institute.pdf.NealeVLDingusTAKlauerSGSudweeksJGoodmanM.An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings (05-0400)Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; 2005 June 6–9, 2005;Washington DC. USA.Available fromhttp://www.dot.alaska.gov/highwaysafety/assets/Occ_Prot-cellphone_National_study-Virginia_Tech_Transp_Institute.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[7]Brumby DP, Salvucci DD, Howes A. Focus on driving: how cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2009 April 4–9; Boston, USA. pp. 1629–38.BrumbyDPSalvucciDDHowesA.Focus on driving: how cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while drivingProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems2009April 4–9Boston, USA16293810.1145/1518701.1518950Search in Google Scholar

[8]Choi SH, Lee JS. The effects of cellular-phone use on driving performance under various driving speed conditions. Korean J Sci Emotion Sensibility. 2006; 6:1–11.ChoiSHLeeJS.The effects of cellular-phone use on driving performance under various driving speed conditionsKorean J Sci Emotion Sensibility.20066111Search in Google Scholar

[9]Haigney DE, Taylor RG, Westerman SJ. Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2000; 3:113–21.10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00020-6HaigneyDETaylorRGWestermanSJ.Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processesTransp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav.2000311321Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10]Lee SW. Differential effects of in-vehicle electronic device usage types on driver’s attentional distraction and driving performance. MSc thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea, 2008.LeeSW.Differential effects of in-vehicle electronic device usage types on driver’s attentional distraction and driving performanceMSc thesisPusan National UniversityPusan, Korea2008Search in Google Scholar

[11]Shin YK, Lim PN, Kang SC. The effects of in vehicle watching TV on driver behavior. Korean Soc Transport. 2006; 24:103–12.ShinYKLimPNKangSC.The effects of in vehicle watching TV on driver behaviorKorean Soc Transport.20062410312Search in Google Scholar

[12]Shin YK, Ryu JB. The effect of operating telematics device in vehicle on driver behaviors. Korean Soc Transport. 2008; 26:39–47.ShinYKRyuJB.The effect of operating telematics device in vehicle on driver behaviorsKorean Soc Transport.2008263947Search in Google Scholar

[13]Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ, Johnson WA. Why do cell phone conversations interfere with driving? In: Walker WR, Herrmann DJ, editors. Cognitive technology: essays on the transformation of thought and society. Jefferson, NC, USA: McFarland and Company; 2005, p. 51–68.StrayerDLDrewsFACrouchDJJohnsonWA.Why do cell phone conversations interfere with driving?WalkerWRHerrmannDJCognitive technology: essays on the transformation of thought and societyJefferson, NC, USAMcFarland and Company20055168Search in Google Scholar

[14]Mun KR, Choi JS, Kang DW, Bang YH, Kim HS, Lee SJ, et al. The effects of secondary task on driving performance: control of vehicle and analysis of motion signal. Korean J Sci Emotion Sensibility. 2010; 13:613–20.MunKRChoiJSKangDWBangYHKimHSLeeSJThe effects of secondary task on driving performance: control of vehicle and analysis of motion signalKorean J Sci Emotion Sensibility.20101361320Search in Google Scholar

[15]Choi YI, Park KS, Eum KS. The Effects of concentration level of telephone conversation on the automobile driver’s performance. KSCE Civil Eng. 2007; 27:165–69.ChoiYIParkKSEumKS.The Effects of concentration level of telephone conversation on the automobile driver’s performanceKSCE Civil Eng.20072716569Search in Google Scholar

[16]Collet C, Clarion A, Morel M, Chapon A, Petit C. Physiological and behavioural changes associated to the management of secondary tasks while driving. Appl Ergon. 2009; 40:1041–46.1924901210.1016/j.apergo.2009.01.007ColletCClarionAMorelMChaponAPetitC.Physiological and behavioural changes associated to the management of secondary tasks while drivingAppl Ergon.200940104146Search in Google Scholar

[17]Kim YS. A study on driver distraction using a driving simulator. MSc, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea, 2010.KimYS.A study on driver distraction using a driving simulator.MSc, Kookmin UniversitySeoul, Korea2010Search in Google Scholar

[18]Koo TY, Kim BY, Ji SH, Suh MW. A study on workload of using telematics while driving. Trans Korean Soc Automot Eng. 2009; 17:26–33.KooTYKimBYJiSHSuhMW.A study on workload of using telematics while drivingTrans Korean Soc Automot Eng.2009172633Search in Google Scholar

[19]Yang JW, Lee SJ, Kim JH, Choi MH, Choi JS, Kim HS, et al. Effects of sending text message and searching navigation on skin conductance level and deviation of vehicle speed during driving. J Soc Korea Ind Syst Eng. 2011; 34:9–14.YangJWLeeSJKimJHChoiMHChoiJSKimHSEffects of sending text message and searching navigation on skin conductance level and deviation of vehicle speed during drivingJ Soc Korea Ind Syst Eng.201134914Search in Google Scholar

[20]Wester AE, Bocker KB, Volkerts ER, Verster JC, Kenemans JL. Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2008; 40:1–7.10.1016/j.aap.2007.02.01418215526WesterAEBockerKBVolkertsERVersterJCKenemansJL.Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated drivingAccid Anal Prev.20084017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21]Merat N, Anttila V, Luoma J. Comparing the driving performance of average and older drivers: the effect of surrogate in-vehicle information systems. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2005; 8:147–66.10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.011MeratNAnttilaVLuomaJ.Comparing the driving performance of average and older drivers: the effect of surrogate in-vehicle information systemsTransp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav.2005814766Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22]Summala H. Accident risk and driver behavior. Saf Sci. 1996; 22:103–17.10.1016/0925-7535(96)00009-4SummalaH.Accident risk and driver behaviorSaf Sci.19962210317Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23]Bellet T, Bailly-Asuni B, Mayenobe P, Banet A. A theoretical and methodological framework for studying and modelling drivers’ mental representations. Saf Sci. 2009; 47:1205–21.10.1016/j.ssci.2009.03.014BelletTBailly-AsuniBMayenobePBanetA.A theoretical and methodological framework for studying and modelling drivers’ mental representationsSaf Sci.200947120521Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24]Hickman JS, Hanowski RJ, Bocanegra J. Distraction in commercial trucks and buses: assessing prevalence and risk in conjunction with crashes and near-crashes. Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-049. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration; 2010 Sept. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.173.3995.HickmanJSHanowskiRJBocanegraJ.Distraction in commercial trucks and buses: assessing prevalence and risk in conjunction with crashes and near-crashesReport No. FMCSA-RRR-10-049Washington, DCU.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration2010Sept.Available fromhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.173.3995Search in Google Scholar