1. bookVolume 8 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
    Health, Media and Participation
Journal Details
First Published
01 Nov 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Open Access


Published Online: 03 Apr 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 8 (2021) - Issue 1 (January 2021) - Health, Media and Participation
Page range: 1 - 18
Journal Details
First Published
01 Nov 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

Abul-Fottouh, D. (2018). Brokerage roles and strategic positions in Twitter networks of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. Policy & Internet, 10(2), 218-240. doi:10.1002/poi3.169.10.1002/poi3.169 Search in Google Scholar

Alpert, J. M., & Womble, F. E. (2016). Just what the doctor tweeted: Physicians’ challenges and rewards of using Twitter. Health Communication, 31(7), 824-832. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1007551.10.1080/10410236.2015.1007551 Search in Google Scholar

Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D. A., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on Instagram. Paper presented at the CHI 2014, Toronto, ON, pp. 965-974. Retrieved from http://eegilbert.org/papers/chi14.faces.bakhshi.pdf10.1145/2556288.2557403 Search in Google Scholar

Bakry, A., & Alkazemi, M. F. (2016). Social media coverage of “Maspero”: Solidarity between Muslims and Christians post the Egyptian uprising. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 16(3), 61-72. doi:10.21018/rjcpr.2014. Search in Google Scholar

Borra, E., & Rieder, B. (2014). Programmed method: Developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 16(3), 262-278. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0094.10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0094 Search in Google Scholar

Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4-17. doi:10.1111/amet.12112.10.1111/amet.12112 Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, (pp. 39-58). New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference 2011, University of Iceland, Reykjavik. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/66324/ Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, A., & Moe, H. (2013). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann, (Eds.) Twitter and Society (pp. 15–28). New York: Peter Lang. Search in Google Scholar

Chaudhry, A., Glodé, L. M., Gillman, M., & Miller, R. S. (2012). Trends in Twitter use by physicians at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. Journal of Oncology Practice, 8(3), 173-178. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000483.10.1200/JOP.2011.000483 Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage. Search in Google Scholar

Cutting, J. (2008). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Damsgaard, D. (2019). Professor i ensomhed: Læger er den mindste solidariske faggrupper, jeg kender [Professor of loneliness: Doctors are the least solidaric professional group I know]. Ugeskriftet 20/2019. Retrieved from https://ugeskriftet.dk/nyhed/professor-i-ensomhed-laeger-er-en-af-de-mindst-solidariske-faggrupper-jeg-kender Search in Google Scholar

De Cock, B., & Pizarro Pedraza, A. (2018). From expressing solidarity to mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic functions of hashtags starting with #jesuis across languages. Language in Society, 47(2), 197-217. doi:10.1017/S0047404518000052.10.1017/S0047404518000052 Search in Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (2001). On the internet. Abingdon: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Du, J., Xu, J., Song, H.-Y., & Tao, C. (2017). Leveraging machine learning-based approaches to assess human papillomavirus vaccination sentiment trends with Twitter data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(2), 69. doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0469-6.10.1186/s12911-017-0469-6 Search in Google Scholar

Fitton, L., Gruen, M., & Poston, L. (2009). Twitter for dummies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

Fusaroli, R., Perlman, M., Mislove, A., Paxton, A., Matlock, T., & Dale, R. (2015). Timescales of massive human entrainment. PloS one, 10(4). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122742.10.1371/journal.pone.0122742 Search in Google Scholar

Fyens Stiftstidende (2018). Sprognævn kårer kvindelandsholdet til årets ord [The Danish Language Council elects the women’s national team as the word of the year]. Retrieved from https://fyens.dk/artikel/sprognævn-kårer-kvindelandsholdet-til-årets-ord-2018-1-19(8). Search in Google Scholar

Gagnon, K. (2015). Using Twitter in health professional education: A case study. Journal of Allied Health, 44(1), 25-33. Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. (2006). An introduction to English semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294-1318. doi:10.1177/0002764211409378.10.1177/0002764211409378 Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1989). Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning “stage 6”. The Philosophical Forum, 21(1), 32. Search in Google Scholar

Hemsley, J., Stromer-Galley, J., Semaan, B., & Tanupabrungsun, S. (2018). Tweeting to the target: Candidates’ use of strategic messages and @mentions on Twitter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics15(1), 3-18. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2017.1338634.10.1080/19331681.2017.1338634 Search in Google Scholar

Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE. Search in Google Scholar

Hopke, J. E. (2015). Hashtagging politics: Transnational anti-fracking movement Twitter practices. Social Media & Society, 1(2), 1-12. doi:10.1177/2056305115605521.10.1177/2056305115605521 Search in Google Scholar

Hougaard, T. T. (2018). Emotionelle appeller i aktivistiske hashtags: Om# jegharoplevet and# detkuhaværetmig [Emotional Appeals in the Danish Activist Hashtags #jegharoplevet (ihaveexperienced) and #detkuhaværetmig (itcouldhavebeenme)], Rhetorica Scandinavica, 1(78), 99-109.10.52610/PMNJ1263 Search in Google Scholar

Højesteret [Danish Supreme Court] (2018). Læge frifundet [Doctor acquitted]. Retrieved from http://www.hoejesteret.dk/hoejesteret/nyheder/Afgorelser/Pages/Laegefrifundet.aspx Search in Google Scholar

Hunt, S. A., & Benford, R. D. (2007). Collective identity, solidarity, and commitment. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 433-457). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Ince, J., Rojas, F., & Davis, C. A. (2017). The social media response to Black Lives Matter: how Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1814-1830. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931.10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931 Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, M., Kyröläinen, A.-J., Ginter, F., Lehti, L., Krizsán, A., & Laippala, V. (2018). Opening up #jesuisCharlie anatomy of a Twitter discussion with mixed methods. Journal of Pragmatics, 129, 90-101. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018. Search in Google Scholar

Jungherr, A., & Jürgens, P. (2014). Through a glass, darkly: Tactical support and symbolic association in Twitter messages commenting on Stuttgart 21. Social Science Computer Review, 32(1), 74-89. doi:10.1177/0894439313500022.10.1177/0894439313500022 Search in Google Scholar

Kolers, A. (2016). A moral theory of solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769781.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Koteyko, N., & Atanasova, D. (2018). Mental health advocacy on Twitter: Positioning in Depression Awareness Week tweets. Discourse, Context & Media, 25, 52-59. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2018. Search in Google Scholar

Laitinen, A., & Pessi, A. B. (2015). Solidarity: Theory and practice. An introduction. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice, (pp.1-20). Lanham: Lexington Books. Search in Google Scholar

Margolin, D., & Liao, W. (2018). The emotional antecedents of solidarity in social media crowds. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3700-3719. doi:10.1177/1461444818758702.10.1177/1461444818758702 Search in Google Scholar

May, L. (1996). The socially responsive self: Social theory and professional ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Murthy, D. (2018). Twitter (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press. Search in Google Scholar

Nakhasi, A., Bell, S. G., Passarella, R. J., Paul, M. J., Dredze, M., & Pronovost, P. J. (2019). The potential of Twitter as a data s ource for patient safety. Journal of Patient Safety 15(4), 32-53. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000253.10.1097/PTS.0000000000000253 Search in Google Scholar

Narayan, B. (2013). From everyday information behaviours to clickable solidarity in a place called social media. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5(3), 32-53. doi: 10.5130/ccs.v5i3.3488.10.5130/ccs.v5i3.3488 Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, F. Å. (2011). A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1103.2903, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. London: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on# Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266-282. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x Search in Google Scholar

Prabhu, V., Lee, T., Loeb, S., Holmes, J. H., Gold, H. T., Lepor, H., ... & Makarov, D. V. (2015). Twitter response to the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against screening with prostate-specific antigen. BJU International, 116(1), 65-71. doi: 10.1111/bju.12748.10.1111/bju.12748 Search in Google Scholar

Reagan, A.J., Danforth, C.M., Tivnan, B., & Dodds, C.S. (2017). Sentiment analysis methods for understanding large-scale t exts: A case for using continuum-scored words and word shift graphs. EPJ Data Science, 6(28). doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0121-9.10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0121-9 Search in Google Scholar

Scholz, S. J. (2008). Political solidarity. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Smith, N. H. (2015). Solidarity and work: A reassessment. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice (pp. 119-134). Lanham: Lexington Books. Search in Google Scholar

Stocchetti, M. (2019). Selfie and interpellation – A preliminary study of the role of ideology in the social construction of reality, self and society in the digital age. KOME − An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry. doi:10.17646/KOME.75672.37.10.17646/KOME.75672.37 Search in Google Scholar

Thomson, T. J., & Greenwood, K. (2017). I “like” that: Exploring the characteristics that promote social media engagement with news photographs. Visual Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 203-218. doi: 10.1080/15551393.2017.1388701.10.1080/15551393.2017.1388701 Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J. H. (2007). Human emotions: A sociological theory. Abingdon: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 788-806. doi:10.1177/1461444810385097.10.1177/1461444810385097 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo