1. bookVolume 7 (2020): Issue 2 (October 2020)
    Failures in Cultural Participation
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2246-3755
First Published
01 Nov 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Talking, Walking and Making in Cheetham Park

Published Online: 06 Apr 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 7 (2020) - Issue 2 (October 2020) - Failures in Cultural Participation
Page range: 1 - 20
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2246-3755
First Published
01 Nov 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

THIS ARTICLE PRESENTS A CASE STUDY OF AN INTERDISCIPLINARY PROJECT IN A SMALL VICTORIAN PUBLIC PARK IN MANCHESTER. THE PROJECT WAS A COLLABORATION BETWEEN MANCHESTER JEWISH MUSEUM AND THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER, WHICH AIMED TO FOSTER PARTICIPATION AND A SENSE OF OWNERSHIP AMONGST LOCAL RESIDENTS, PARK USERS AND MUSEUM VISITORS, AND CREATE A SUSTAINABLE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE TO LOOK AFTER THIS PARTICULAR PUBLIC SPACE. ACADEMIC RESEARCHERS AND AN ARTIST-IN-RESIDENCE WORKED TOGETHER USING A RANGE OF PARTICIPATORY METHODS WE SUMMARISE AS ‘TALKING, WALKING AND MAKING’. HERE WE REFLECT CRITICALLY THROUGH THE FRAMEWORK OF ‘THE COMMONS’ TO IDENTIFY HOW AND WHY THE PROJECT FAILED TO PRODUCE ITS INTENDED OUTCOMES. WE FOCUS ON ONE OBJECT, THE PARK'S SHELTER; AND ONE EVENT, THE PARK’S 130TH ANNIVERSARY, AS ‘BOUNDARY OBJECTS’ (STAR & GRIESEMER, 1989) TO REVEAL THE DISSONANT WORLD-VIEWS OF THE PROJECT’S PARTICIPANTS, CRITICALLY ASSESS ITS PARTICIPATORY METHODS, AND OFFER REFLEXIVITY FROM A MULTIDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE.

Keywords

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin and London: University of Texas Press. Search in Google Scholar

Candea, M. (2007). Arbitrary locations: In defence of the bounded field–site. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(1), 167–184.10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x Search in Google Scholar

Debord, G. (1994). The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books. Search in Google Scholar

Doyle, P. (2013). History of parks in Cheetham, Broughton and Salford. Understanding everyday participation. University of Manchester. Search in Google Scholar

Eagles, S. (2009). Thomas Coglan Horsfall, and Manchester art museum and university settlement. The Encyclopaedia of Informal Education. Retrieved from http://www.infed.org/settlements/manchester_art_museum_and_university_settlement.htm Search in Google Scholar

Evans, G. (2012). Practising participant observation: An anthropologist’s account. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 1(1), 96–106.10.1108/20466741211220697 Search in Google Scholar

Facer, K., & Enright, B. (2016). Creating living knowledge (pp. 1–182). Retrieved from https://connected-communities.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Creating-Living-Knowledge.Final.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Gilmore A. (2017). The park and the commons: Vernacular spaces for everyday participation and cultural value, Cultural Trends, 26(1), 34–46. https://doi-org.manchester.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/09548963.2017.1274358 Search in Google Scholar

Gilmore, A., & Doyle, P. (2019). Histories of public parks in Manchester and Salford and their role in cultural policies for everyday participation. In E. Belfiore & L. Gibson (Eds.), Histories of Cultural Participation, Values and Governance. Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/978-1-137-55027-9_6 Search in Google Scholar

Gidwani, V., & Baviskar, A. (2011). Urban Commons. Review of urban affairs: Economic & Political Weekly, 46(50). Search in Google Scholar

Graham, H. (2017).The art of taking part: Participation at the museum. ARKEN Bulletin, 7, 150–167. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/arken_museum/docs/bulletin_2017_fe4c9dee90af81 Search in Google Scholar

Graham, H. (2019). How the exhibition became co-produced: Attunement and participatory ontologies for museums. In P. Bjerregaard (Ed.), Exhibitions as research: Experimental methods in museums (pp. 181–194). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. Search in Google Scholar

Heritage Lottery Fund. (2016). State of the UK public parks research report. London: Heritage Lottery Fund. Search in Google Scholar

Heumann Gurian, E. (2005). Threshold fear. In S. Macleod(Ed.), Reshaping Museum Space. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Hine, D. (2015). Friendship and the Commons, in The European Cultural Foundation and Krytyka Politycz (Eds) Build the city: Perspectives on commons and culture, August 2015, Amsterdam: European Cultural Foundation, 32-36. Search in Google Scholar

Historic England. (2017). Cheetham Park Shelter. Retrieved from https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1446330 Search in Google Scholar

Hodkinson, S. (2012). The new urban enclosures. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 16(5), 500–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2012.70940310.1080/13604813.2012.709403 Search in Google Scholar

Hyde, L. (2012). Common as Air: Revolution, Art and Ownership London: Union Books Search in Google Scholar

Jordan, H. (1994). Public Parks, 1885-1914. Garden History, 22, 85–113.10.2307/1587004 Search in Google Scholar

Khonsari, T. (2015). ‘About’ Cheetham (Elizabeth Street) Park Project, https://cheethampark.wordpress.com/about/ Search in Google Scholar

Lang, L. (2018). Making and enabling the commons: Shared urban spaces and civic engagement in North Manchester. In C.10.7228/manchester/9781526100733.003.0006 Search in Google Scholar

Lewis & J. Symons (Eds.), Realising the city: Urban ethnography in Manchester (pp. 107–128). Manchester University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Linebaugh, P. (2009). The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. California: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

Linebaugh, P. (2014). Stop Thief! The commons, enclosures and resistance. Oakland, CA: PM Press. Search in Google Scholar

Manchester City Council. (2018, May 24) Update on Manchester parks strategy: 2017–2026: Report to Communities and Equalities Scrutiny Committee. Manchester: Manchester City Council. Search in Google Scholar

McGuirk, J. (2015, June 15). Urban commons have radical potential – it’s not just about community gardens. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/jun/15/urban-common-radical-community-gardens Search in Google Scholar

Nesta. (2016). Learning to rethink parks. London: Nesta. Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, C. (2019). The greening of the city: Urban parks and public leisure, 1840-1939. CRC Press.10.4324/9781315866840 Search in Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807763 Search in Google Scholar

Savage, M. (2013). The ‘Social Life of Methods’: A critical introduction. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 3–21.10.1177/0263276413486160 Search in Google Scholar

Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of co-operation. London: Yale University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Simon, N. (2010). The participatory museum. Santa Cruz: Museum 2.0. Search in Google Scholar

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). Basingstoke: Macmillan Education. Search in Google Scholar

Standing, G. (2019). Plunder of the commons: A manifesto for sharing public wealth. Penguin Random House. Search in Google Scholar

Star, S. & Griesemer, J. (1989). “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39”. Social Studies of Science. 19 (3): 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.10.1177/030631289019003001 Search in Google Scholar

The Parks Agency. (2017, December 25). In austerity Britain people need parks, open letter. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2017/dec/25/in-austerity-britain-people-need-parks Search in Google Scholar

Wacquant, L. (1989). For a socio-analysis of intellectuals: On homo academicus. An interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 34. Search in Google Scholar

Yardley, A. (2008). Piecing together – A methodological bricolage. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), Art. 31. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/416/903. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo