This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Barber DC, Seagar AD. Fast reconstruction of resistance images Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 1987;8:47–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/00610.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/006BarberDCSeagarADFast reconstruction of resistance images ClinPhys. Physiol. Meas1987847–54http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/0063568570Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brown BH, Seagar AD. The Sheffield data collection system Clincal Phys. Physiol. Meas. 1987;8:91–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/01210.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/012BrownBHSeagarADThe Sheffield data collection system Clincal PhysPhysiol. Meas1987891–97http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/0123568577Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Meier T, Luepschen H, Karsten J, Leibecke T, Großherr M, Gehring H, Leonhardt S, Assessment of regional lung recruitment and derecruitment during a peep trial based on electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med. 2008; 34:543–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0786-91765352910.1007/s00134-007-0786-9MeierTLuepschenHKarstenJLeibeckeTGroßherrMGehringHLeonhardtSAssessment of regional lung recruitment and derecruitment during a peep trial based on electrical impedance tomographyIntensive Care Med200834543–50http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0786-917653529Search in Google Scholar
Frerichs I, Dudykevych T, Hinz J, Bodenstein M, Hahn G, Hellige G. Funktionelle elektrische Impedanztomographie Intensivmed. Notfallmed. 2001; 91:39–50FrerichsIDudykevychTHinzJBodensteinMHahnGHelligeGFunktionelle elektrische Impedanztomographie IntensivmedNotfallmed20019139–50Search in Google Scholar
Frerichs I, Hinz J, Herrmann P, Weisser G, Hahn G, Dudykevych T, Quintel M, Hellige G. Detection of local lung air content by electrical impedance tomography compared with electron beam CT . J. Appl. Physiol. 2002; 93:660–6.10.1152/japplphysiol.00081.2002FrerichsIHinzJHerrmannPWeisserGHahnGDudykevychTQuintelMHelligeGDetection of local lung air content by electrical impedance tomography compared with electron beam CTJ. Appl. Physiol200293660–612133877Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Frerichs I, Hinz J, Herrmann P, Weisser G, Hahn G, Quintel M, Hellige G. Regional lung perfusion as determined by electrical impedance tomography in comparison with electron beam ct imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2002; 21:646–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2002.80058510.1109/TMI.2002.800585FrerichsIHinzJHerrmannPWeisserGHahnGQuintelMHelligeGRegional lung perfusion as determined by electrical impedance tomography in comparison with electron beam ct imagingIEEE Trans. Med. Imaging200221646–52http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2002.800585718603012166861Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Luepschen H, Meier T, Grossherr M, Leibecke T, Karsten J, Leonhardt S. Protective ventilation using electrical impedance tomography. Physiol. Meas. 2007; 29:S247–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/28/7/S18LuepschenHMeierTGrossherrMLeibeckeTKarstenJLeonhardtSProtective ventilation using electrical impedance tomographyPhysiol. Meas200729S247–60http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/28/7/S1810.1088/0967-3334/28/7/S1817664639Search in Google Scholar
Kunst PWA, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Hoekstra OS, Postmus PE, de Vries PMJM. Ventilation and perfusion imaging by electrical impedance tomography: a comparison with radionuclide scanning. Physiol. Meas. 1998; 19:481–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/19/4/00310.1088/0967-3334/19/4/0039863674KunstPWAVonk-NoordegraafAHoekstraOSPostmusPEdeVries PMJMVentilation and perfusion imaging by electrical impedance tomography: a comparison with radionuclide scanningPhysiol. Meas199819481–90http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/19/4/0039863674Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yan P, Mo Y. Using Independent Component Analysis for Electrical Impedance Tomography. SPIE-IS&T. 2004; 5298: 448-454.YanPMoYUsing Independent Component Analysis for Electrical Impedance TomographySPIE-IS&T20045298448–45410.1117/12.525632Search in Google Scholar
McArdle FJ, Suggett AJ, Brown BH, Barber DC. An assessment of dynamic images by applied potential tomography for monitoring pulmonary perfusion. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 1988; 9: 87–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0815/9/4A/015324065610.1088/0143-0815/9/4A/015McArdleFJSuggettAJBrownBHBarberDCAn assessment of dynamic images by applied potential tomography for monitoring pulmonary perfusionClin. Phys. Physiol. Meas1988987–91http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0815/9/4A/0153240656Search in Google Scholar
Eyuboglu BM, Brown BH, Barber DC. In vivo imaging of cardiac related impedance changes. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 1989; 8: 39–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/51.324041823830410.1109/51.32404EyubogluBMBrownBHBarberDCIn vivo imaging of cardiac related impedance changesIEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag1989839–45http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/51.3240418238304Search in Google Scholar
Smit HJ, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Boonstra A, de Vries PMJM, Postmus PE. Assessment of the pulmonary volume pulse in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension by means of electrical impedance tomography. Respir. 2006; 73: 597–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/00008869410.1159/000088694SmitHJVonk-NoordegraafABoonstraAdeVries PMJMPostmusPEAssessment of the pulmonary volume pulse in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension by means of electrical impedance tomographyRespir200673597–602http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/00008869416205046Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smit HJ, Handoko ML, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Faes TJC, Postmus PE, de Vries PMJM, Boonstra A. Electrical impedance tomography to measure pulmonary perfusion: is the reproducibility high enough for clinical practice? Physiol. Meas. 2003; 24: 491–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/24/2/3591281243210.1088/0967-3334/24/2/359SmitHJHandokoMLVonkNoordegraaf AFaesTJCPostmusPEdeVries PMJMBoonstraAElectrical impedance tomography to measure pulmonary perfusion: is the reproducibility high enough for clinical practice?Physiol. Meas200324491–499http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/24/2/35912812432Search in Google Scholar
Deibele JM, Luepschen H, Leonhardt S. Dynamic separation of pulmonary and cardiac changes in electrical impedance tomography. Physiol. Meas. 2008; 29: S1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S0110.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S0118544813DeibeleJMLuepschenHLeonhardtSDynamic separation of pulmonary and cardiac changes in electrical impedance tomographyPhysiol. Meas200829S1–14http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S0118544813Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Grant CA, Pham T, Hough J, Riedel T, Stocker C, Schibler A. Measurement of ventilation and cardiac related impedance changes with electrical impedance tomography. Crit. Care. 2011; 15:R37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc998510.1186/cc998521266025GrantCAPhamTHoughJRiedelTStockerCSchiblerAMeasurement of ventilation and cardiac related impedance changes with electrical impedance tomographyCrit. Care201115R37http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9985322207421266025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leathard AD, Brown BH, Campbell J, Zhang F, Moricea H, Tayler D. A comparison of ventilatory and cardiac related changes in EIT images of normal human lungs and of lungs with pulmonary emboli. Physiol. Meas. 1994; 15: A137–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/15/2A/018808703610.1088/0967-3334/15/2A/018LeathardADBrownBHCampbellJZhangFMoriceaHTaylerDA comparison of ventilatory and cardiac related changes in EIT images of normal human lungs and of lungs with pulmonary emboliPhysiol. Meas199415A137–146http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/15/2A/0188087036Search in Google Scholar
Frerichs I, Pulletz S, Elke G, Reifferscheid F, Schadler D, Scholz J, Weiler N. Assessment of changes in distribution of lung perfusion by electrical impedance tomography. Respir. 2009; 77:282–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/00019399410.1159/000193994FrerichsIPulletzSElkeGReifferscheidFSchadlerDScholzJWeilerNAssessment of changes in distribution of lung perfusion by electrical impedance tomographyRespir200977282–91http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/00019399419147986Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pikkemaat R, Leonhardt S. Separation of ventilation and perfusion related signals within EIT-data streams. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010; 224:012-028.PikkemaatRLeonhardtSSeparation of ventilation and perfusion related signals within EIT-data streamsJ. Phys. Conf. Ser2010224012–02810.1088/1742-6596/224/1/012028Search in Google Scholar
Zhukov L, Weinstein D, Johnson C. Independent component analysis for EEG source localization. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2000; 19(3): 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/51.8443861083412210.1109/51.844386ZhukovLWeinsteinDJohnsonCIndependent component analysis for EEG source localizationIEEE Eng Med Biol Mag200019387–96http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/51.84438610834122Search in Google Scholar
Zhukov L, Weinstein D, Johnson CR. Independent Component Analysis for EEG Source Localization in Realistic Head Models. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. 2000; 3(19): 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/51.844386ZhukovLWeinsteinDJohnsonCRIndependent Component Analysis for EEG Source Localization in Realistic Head ModelsIEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology200031987–96http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/51.84438610.1109/51.844386Search in Google Scholar
Arinen AH, Oja E. A Fast Fixed-Point Algorithm for Independent Component Analysis. Neural Computation, 1997; 9(7):1483-1492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.148310.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1483ArinenAHOjaEA Fast Fixed-Point Algorithm for Independent Component AnalysisNeural Computation1997971483–1492http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1483Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Naik GR, Kumar DK. An Overview of Independent Component Analysis and Its Applications. Informatica, 2011; 35: 63–81.NaikGRKumarDKAn Overview of Independent Component Analysis and Its ApplicationsInformatica20113563–81Search in Google Scholar
Nguyen DT, Jin C, Thiagalingam A, McEwan AL. A review on electrical impedance tomography for pulmonary perfusion imaging. Physiol. Meas. 2012; 33: 695–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/5/6952253229110.1088/0967-3334/33/5/695NguyenDTJinCThiagalingamAMcEwanALA review on electrical impedance tomography for pulmonary perfusion imagingPhysiol. Meas201233695–706http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/5/69522532291Search in Google Scholar
