Anatomic variants of intrahepatic bile ducts in Thais

1. Crawford JM. Development of the intrahepatic biliary tree. Semin Liver Dis. 2002; 22:213-6.10.1055/s-2002-3450812360416Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Vijayan V, Tan CE. Development of the human intrahepatic biliary system. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1999; 28:105-8.Search in Google Scholar

3. Moore K, Persuad TVN. The developing human: Clinically oriented embryology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Suanders; 1998. p. 277-80.Search in Google Scholar

4. Sadler TW. Langman’s medical embryology. 7th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 252-6.Search in Google Scholar

5. Koga A, Yamada E. Morphogenesis of intrahepatic bile ducts of the human fetus. Anat Entwickl-Gesch. 1971; 135:156-84.10.1007/BF005211085135745Search in Google Scholar

6. Desmet VJ. Pathogenesis of ductal plate malformation. J Gastroen Hepatol. 2004; 19:S356-60.10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03702.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Koenraad J, Pablo R. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: MR cholangiographic findings and clinical applications. AJR. 2001; 177:390-4.Search in Google Scholar

8. Gazelle GS, Lee MJ, Mueller PR. Cholangiographic segmental anatomy of the liver. RadioGraphics. 1994; 14:1005-13.10.1148/radiographics.14.5.79918107991810Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Wise PE, Holzman MD. Surgical anatomy of the gallbladder, liver, and biliary tree. In: Bruce V, Macfadyen JR, editors. Laparoscopic surgery of the abdomen. New York: Springer; 2004. p. 73 - 86.10.1007/0-387-21780-0_11Search in Google Scholar

10. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC. MR cholangio-pancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics. 2000; 20:939-57.10.1148/radiographics.20.4.g00jl2393910903685Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Barkun AN, Atri M. Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 1996; 199: 521-7.10.1148/radiology.199.2.86688058668805Search in Google Scholar

12. Murat K, Mehmet SU, Nail B, Ibrahim S. MR cholangiopancreatography of a case with a biliary tract variation and postoperative biliary duct injury. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2005; 11:219-21.Search in Google Scholar

13. Reinbold C, Bert PM, Guibaud L. MR cholangiopancreatography: potential clinical applications. Radiographics. 1996; 16:309-20.10.1148/radiographics.16.2.89662898966289Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Bearcroft PW, Lomas DJ. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreato-graphy. Gut. 1997; 41:135-7.10.1136/gut.41.2.13518914649301488Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. L Van Hoe. Atlas of cross-sectional and projective MR cholangiopancreatography. Berlin: Springer; 2001.10.1007/978-3-642-59808-1Search in Google Scholar

16. Puente SG, Bannura GC. Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg. 1983; 7:271-6.10.1007/BF016561596868640Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Cheng YF, Huang TL, Chen CL, Sheen-Chen SM, Lui CC, Chen TY, et al. Anatomic dissociation between the intrahepatic bile duct and portal vein: risk factors for left hepatectomy. World J Surg. 1997; 21:297-300.10.1007/s0026899002329015174Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Kim HJ, Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Kim YT, Lee DK, et al. Normal structure, variations and anomalies of the pancreaticobiliary ducts of Koreans: a nationwide cooperative prospective study. Gastrointest Endos. 2002; 55:889-96.10.1067/mge.2002.12463512024146Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Choi JW, Kim TK, Kim KW, Kim AY, Kim PN, Ha HK, et al. Anatomic variation in intrahepatic bile ducts: an analysis of intraoperative cholangiograms in 300 consecutive donors for living donor liver transplantation. Korean J Radiol. 2003; 4:85-90.10.3348/kjr.2003.4.2.85269807512845303Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Kitagawa Y, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Uesaka K, et al. Intrahepatic segmental bile duct patterns in hepatolithiasis: a comparative cholangiographic study between Taiwan and Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003; 10:377-81.10.1007/s00534-002-0834-314598139Search in Google Scholar

21. Ayuso JR, Ayuso C, Bombuy E, De Juan C, Llovet JM, De Caralt TM, et al. Preoperative evaluation of biliary anatomy in adult live liver donors with volumetric mangafodipir trisodium enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. Liver Transpl. 2004; 10:1391-7.10.1002/lt.2028115497156Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Lee VS, Krinsky GA, Nazzaro CA, Chang JS, Babb JS, Lin JC, et al. Defining intrahepatic biliary anatomy in living liver transplant donor candidates at mangafodipir trisodium enhanced MR cholangiography versus conventional T2 weighted MR cholangiography. Radiology. 2004; 233:659-66.10.1148/radiol.233303197715516606Search in Google Scholar

23. Macdonald DB, Haider MA, Khalili K, Kim TK, O’Malley M, Greig PD, et al. Relationship between vascular and biliary anatomy in living liver donors. AJR. 2005; 185:247-52.10.2214/ajr.185.1.0185024715972431Search in Google Scholar