1. bookVolume 5 (2011): Issue 5 (October 2011)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1875-855X
First Published
01 Jun 2007
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Determination of antibiotic susceptibility pattern in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from children with acute diarrhea

Published Online: 04 Feb 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 5 (2011) - Issue 5 (October 2011)
Page range: 611 - 618
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1875-855X
First Published
01 Jun 2007
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Background: The emergence of antimicrobial resistant Campylobacter populations, which become an important consideration on the use of antimicrobial agents, especially in veterinary and human medicine, has become a serious concern worldwide. For monitoring the drug resistance, there is a need to develop reliable and reproducible laboratory techniques. There are several methods including disk diffusion, broth micro-dilution, agar dilution, and E-test to determine in-vitro susceptibility profiles of Campylobacter to a range of antimicrobial agents.

Objectives: Study the Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from children with diarrhea and determine the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the isolates to clinically relevant antimicrobials.

Materials and methods: Two hundred twenty stool samples of children with diarrhea were cultured on Preston agar and the isolated campylobacter species were identified by further standard identification test. Susceptibility testing was carried out using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method and E-test.

Results: Fourteen Campylobacter strains were isolated (6.36%), of which nine (64.3%) were identified as C. jejuni and five (35.7%) as C. coli. Using disk diffusion, all the campylobacter isolates were fully resistant to cephalothin, oxacillin, and ampicillin followed by ceftazidime with resistance rate of 71.42%. Gentamicin and ciprofloxacin were the most effective antibiotics against both isolated campylobacter species. According to E-test results, Campylobacter isolates demonstrated the greatest resistance to cephalothin (92.85%), oxacillin (92.85%), and ampicillin (78.57%).

Conclusions: Our study reveals a high-level correlation between the E-test and agar disk diffusion method in evaluating the resistance of Campylobacter species to tested antimicrobial agents. This study also suggests disk diffusion is a reliable and cost effective technique for determining the prevalence of resistance among Campylobacter isolates.

Keywords

1. Jacobs-Reitsma W. Campylobacter in the food supply. In: Campylobacter. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology. 2000: 467-81.Search in Google Scholar

2. Alfredson DA, Akburst RJ, Korolik V. Antibacterial resistance and genomic screening of clinical isolates of thermophilic Campylobacter species from south-east Queensland, Australia. J Appl Microbiol. 2003; 94: 495-500.10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01856.x12588558Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Aarestrup FM, Engberg J. Antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter. Vet Res. 2001; 32:311-21.10.1051/vetres:2001127Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Skirrow MB. Campylobacter enteritis: a ‘‘new’’ disease. Br Med J. 1977; 2: 9-11.10.1136/bmj.2.6078.91631297871765Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Javid MH, Ahmed SH. Campylobacter infections. Accessed December 10, 2009. Available from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/213720-overviewSearch in Google Scholar

6. Aquino MH, Filgueiras AL, Ferreira MC, Oliverira SS, Bastos MC, Tibana A. Antimicrobial resistance and plasmid profiles of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from human and animal sources. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2002; 34:149-53.10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01060.x11849513Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Alfredson DA, Korolik V. Antibiotic resistance and resistance mechanisms in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007; 277: 123-32.10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00935.x18031331Search in Google Scholar

8. Lucey B, Cryan B, O’Halloran F, Wall PG, Buckley T, Fanning S. Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility among isolates of Campylobacter species in Ireland and the emergence of resistance to ciprofloxacin. Vet Rec. 2002; 151:317-20.10.1136/vr.151.11.31712356234Search in Google Scholar

9. Ge B, Bodeis S, Walker RD, White DG, Zhao S, McDermott PF, Meng J. Comparison of the E-test and agar dilution for in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002; 50:487-94.10.1093/jac/dkf16212356792Search in Google Scholar

10. Blaser MJ. Campylobacter and related species. In: Mandell GL, Bennett J E, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone. 2000: 2276-85.Search in Google Scholar

11. Feierl G, Berghold C, Furaa T, Marth E. Further increase in ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni/coli in Styria. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1999; 5:59-60.10.1111/j.1469-0691.1999.tb00102.x11856217Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Hoge CW, Gambel JM, Srijan A, Pitarangsi C, Echeverria P. Trends in antibiotic resistance among diarrheal pathogens isolated in Thailand over 15 years. Clin Infect Dis. 1998; 26:341-5.10.1086/5163039502453Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Maqsood Ali A, Qureshi AH, Rafi S, IAhmad Khan I, Hussain S. Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni in Rawalpindi and Islamabad - A preliminary study. Pak J Med Sci. 2003; 19:272-6.Search in Google Scholar

14. Isenbarger DW, Hoge CW, Srijan A, Pitarangi C, Vithayasai N, Bodhidata L, Hickey KW, Cam PD. Comparative antibiotic resistance of diarrheal pathogens from Vietnam and Thailand, 1996-1999. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002; 8:175-80.10.3201/eid0802.010145336958311897070Search in Google Scholar

15. Shea KM. Antibiotic resistance: what is the impact of agricultural uses of antibiotics on children’s health?. Pediatrics. 2003; 112:253-8.10.1542/peds.112.S1.253Search in Google Scholar

16. Luber P, Bartelt E, Genschow E, Wagner J, Hahn H. Comparison of broth microdilution, E-test and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41:1062-8.10.1128/JCM.41.3.1062-1068.2003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. McGill K, Cowley D, Moran L, Scates P, O’Leary A, Madden RH, Carroll C, McNamara E, Moore JE, Fanning S, Collins JD, Whyte P. 2006. Antibiotic resistance of retail food and human Campylobacter isolates on the island of Ireland from 2001-2002. Epidemiol Infect. 2006; 134:1282-91.10.1017/S0950268806006200Search in Google Scholar

18. Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS. Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology, 12th ed., St. Louis: Mosby Inc. 2007:546-61.Search in Google Scholar

19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 12th Informational Supplement, CLSI Document M100-S12, Pennsylvania, USA. 2002.Search in Google Scholar

20. King A. Recommendations for susceptibility tests on fastidious organisms and those requiring special handling. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001; 48 (Suppl. S1):77-80.10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.77Search in Google Scholar

21. Oncul O, Zarakolu P, Oncul O, Gur D. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni: a comparison between E-test and agar dilution method. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003; 45:69-71.10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00496-0Search in Google Scholar

22. McGill K, Kelly L, Madden RH, Moran L, Carroll C, O’Leary A, Moore JE, McNamara E, O’Mahony M, Fanning S, Whyte P. Comparison of disc diffusion and epsilometer (E-test) testing techniques todetermine antimicrobial susceptibiliy of Campylobacter isolates of food and human clinical origin. J Microbiological Methods. 2009; 79:238-41.10.1016/j.mimet.2009.09.02019793541Search in Google Scholar

23. Fallon R, O’Sullivan N, Maher M, Carroll C. Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates from broiler chickens solated at an Irish poultry processing plant. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003; 36:277-81.10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01308.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Luangtongkum T, Morishita TY, El-Tayeb A, Ison AJ, Zhang Q. Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter species by the agar dilution and the agar disk diffusion methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45:590-4.10.1128/JCM.00986-06182902817122005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Nachamkin I, Engberg J, Aarestrup FM. Diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter species. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser M J, editors. Campylobacter. Washington, DC: ASM Press. 2000:45-66.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo