This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Gabriel, I., (2018). “The case for fairer algorithms”, Medium. Iegūts 14.03.2023. https://medium.com/@Ethics_Society/the-case-for-fairer-algorithms-c008a12126f8Search in Google Scholar
Pasquale, F., (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Iegūts 14.03.2023. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/books/96/Search in Google Scholar
Reisman, D., (2018). “Algorithmic impact assessments: a practical framework for public agency accountability”, AI Now. Iegūts 14.03.2023. https://ainowinstitute.org/aiareport2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Rieke, A., Bogen, M., Robinson, D., (2018). “Public scrutiny of automated decisions: early lessons and emerging methods”, Omidyar and Upturn. Iegūts 10.03.2023. https://omidyar.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Public-Scrutiny-of-Automated-Decisions.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Streļčenoks, J., (2021). Mākslīgā intelekta jēdziens un darbības tiesiskie pamatprincipi: pasaules pieredze, BA Turība University, lpp.144-155, Iegūts 15.03.2023. https://www.turiba.lv/storage/files/xxii-conference-2021.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Суходолов, А.П., Бычкова, А.М., (2018). Искусственный интеллект в противодействии преступности, её прогнозировании, предупреждении и эволюции, Russian Journal of Criminology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 753-766. Iegūts 14.03.2023. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37056278Search in Google Scholar
Council of Europe, Algorithms and Human Rights (2017). Iegūts 14.03.2023. https://rm.coe.int/algorithms-and-human-rights-en-rev/16807956b5Search in Google Scholar
European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial systems and their environment, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2018). Iegūts 14.03.2023. https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699cSearch in Google Scholar
Ad Hoc Expert Group (AHEG) for the preparation of a draft text of a recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence, UNESCO’s General Conference at its 40th session (40 C/Resolution 37), SHS/BIO/AHEG-AI/2020/4 REV.2 (2020). Iegūts 14.03.2023. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/in/rest/annotationSVC/Attachment/attach_upload_feb9258a-9458-4535-9920-fca53c95a424Search in Google Scholar
Informācijas sistēmas darbības koncepcijas apraksta izstrādes metodika, apstiprināta ar Reģionālās attīstības un pašvaldību lietu ministrijas 2010.gada 7.decembra rīkojumu Nr.2-02/257, Iegūts 17.03.2023. https://www.varam.gov.lv/sites/varam/files/content/files/isdkoncepcijas_metodika.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Amnesty International and Access Now, “Toronto declaration: protecting the right to equality and non-discrimination in machine learning systems”, art. 27 (d) (2018). Iegūts 14.03.2023. https://www.accessnow.org/the-toronto-declaration-protecting-the-rights-to-equality-andnondiscrimination-in-machine-learning-systems/Search in Google Scholar
Article 19 and Privacy International, “Privacy and freedom of expression”. A/73/348 22/29 18-14238X (2017). Iegūts 14.03.2023. https://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/38657/Expression-and-Privacy-Principles-1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Latvijas universitātes Mākslīgā intelekta laboratorijas skaidrojošā un sinonīmu vārdnīca Tēzaurs.lv, Iegūts 03.04.2023. https://tezaurs.lv/koncepcija:1Search in Google Scholar
Концепция развития регулирования отношений в сфере технологий искусственного интеллекта и робототехники до 2024 года, распоряжение Правительства Российской Федерации от 19.08.2020 № 2129-р. Iegūts 14.03.2023. http://government.ru/docs/all/129505/Search in Google Scholar
