The Problems of In-House Procurement in Lithuanian Public Procurement

1Council Directive 2006/97/EC of 20 November 2006 adapting certain Directives in the field of free movement of goods, by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania, OL L 363;Search in Google Scholar

2Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance, OL, 2014 L 94/65;Search in Google Scholar

3Law on Competition of the Republic of Lithuania. Valstybės žinios, No. 30-856 (1999);Search in Google Scholar

4Law on Public Procurement of the Republic of Lithuania. Valstybės žinios, No. 84-2000 (1996);Search in Google Scholar

5Law on Articles 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 5. 23, 24, 25, 27, 33, 37, 38, 40, 41, 56, 57 of the Law on Public Procurement of the Republic of Lithuania, Articles 71, 73, 81, 82, 83, 85, 86, 91, 92, 94, 951, 97, the title of Chapter V, Appendices 1, 2, 4 and the Addendum Law No. XI-1255. Valstybės žinios, No. 2-36.Search in Google Scholar

6Law on Local Self-Government of the Republic of Lithuania. Valstybės žinios, Nr. 55-1049 (1994);Search in Google Scholar

7Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania on the approval of the provisions of the Public Procurement Service, Valstybės žinios, No. 161-7630 (2011);Search in Google Scholar

8Janssen W. A. (2014). The Institutionalised and Non-Institutionalised Exemptions from EU Public Procurement Law: Towards a More Coherent Approach? Untrecht Law Rewiew.Search in Google Scholar

9Soloveičikas D. (2009). Vidaus pirkimai kaip viešojo pirkimo sutarties išimtis. Teisė, t. 71.Search in Google Scholar

10the Court of Justice of the European Union 12^th November 1999 decision in case Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano Case No. C-107/98, ECR I-8121, ECLI:EU:C:1999:562.Search in Google Scholar

11the Court of Justice of the European Union 22^th May 2003 decision in case Arkkitehtuuritoimisto Riitta Korhonen Oy and others No. C-18/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:300.Search in Google Scholar

12the Court of Justice of the European Union 11^th January 2005 decision in case Stadt Halle, RPL Recyclingpark Lochau GmbH v Arbeitsgemeinschaft Thermische Restabfall- and Energieverwertungsanlage TREA Leuna No. C-26/03.Search in Google Scholar

13the Court of Justice of the European Union 3^rd October 2019 decision in case Kauno miesto savivaldybė v Kauno miesto savivaldybės administracija and UAB „Irgita“, UAB „Kauno švara No. C-285/18. ECLI:EU:C:2019:829.Search in Google Scholar

14the Supreme Court of Lithuania Civil cases division 13^th April 2018 ruling in civil case No. e3K-3-120-469/2018.Search in Google Scholar

15the Supreme Court of Lithuania Civil cases division 17^th December 2019 ruling in civil case No. e3K-3-494-469/2019.Search in Google Scholar

16the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania 29^th March 2016 ruling in administrative case No. A-347-552/2016.Search in Google Scholar

17the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania 5^th February 2020 ruling in administrative case No. eA-893-556/2020.Search in Google Scholar

18The decree No. 1K-940 of the President of the Republic of Lithuania of 18 April 2017. TAR, No. 6598Search in Google Scholar

19The Competition Council 30th April 2015 resolution No. 1S-45/2015 “Regarding the market research of municipal waste management services”.Search in Google Scholar

20Lithuanian Free Market Institute (2019). Vidaus sandoriai – grėsmė konkurencijai. [online]. Available at: https://www.llri.lt/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/PB_Vidaus-sandoriai-savivaldyb--se_20190327.pdf (accessed: 10.10.2022).Search in Google Scholar

21the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania the 8^th October 2019 VII session transcript No. 333 [online]. Available at: https://eseimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAK/68cf28a0ea7911e99f05bdf72918ad4e?positionInSearchResults=4&searchModelUUID=90b64bc2-d10a-4b9d-81c4-2d8d069a49b4 (accessed: 10.10.2022).Search in Google Scholar

22the Economic Committee of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania 22^th December 2010 meeting protocol No. 108-P-49 [online]. Available at: https://eseimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAK/TAIS.389632?positionInSearchResults=0&searchModelUUID=2a645f94-257d-45a1-810c-b0cbde0d419e (accessed: 10.10.2022).Search in Google Scholar

23the Education, Science and Culture Committee of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania 12^th June 2013 conclusion No. 106-P-25 [online]. Available at: https://eseimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAK/TAIS.450972?positionInSearchResults=22&searchModelUUID=2a645f94-257d-45a1-810c-b0cbde0d419e (accessed: 10.10.2022).Search in Google Scholar

24Soloveičik D. (2019). So, the fate of the EU in-house awards is getting clearer. [online]. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/so-fate-eu-in-house-awards-getting-clearerdeividas-soloveicik?articleId=6532232977253048320#comments-6532232977253048320&trk=public_profile_article_view. (accessed: 10.10.2022).Search in Google Scholar

25Balčiūnaitė S. (2019). Iš VPT žinia dėl dviejų valstybės įmonių: rado landų ir toliau sudaro vidaus sandorius. [online]. Available at: https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/verslas/4/1051080/is-vptzinia-del-dviejuvalstybes-imoniu-rado-landu-ir-toliau-sudaro-vidaus-sandorius (accessed: 10.10.2022).Search in Google Scholar