Parody as a Fair Use of Freedom of Speech

1Blūmfelds, A. (2004). Noraida Rušenieka prasību pret Viesturu Dūli. Available: https://www.apollo.lv/4684477/noraidarusenieka-prasibu-pret-viesturu-duliSearch in Google Scholar

2Britannica Dictionary (2023). Parody literature. Available: https://www.britannica.com/art/parody-literatureSearch in Google Scholar

3Code de la propriété intellectuelle (2020). L 122-5. Article 4°. Available: https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/569956Search in Google Scholar

4Constitutional Assembly of Latvia (1922). Latvijas Republikas Satversme. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/57980-latvijas-republikas-satversmeSearch in Google Scholar

5Constitutional Court of Latvia (2003). Satversmes tiesas nolēmums 2003.gada 03.jūnijā lietā Nr. 2003-02-0106 par komerciālo raidorganizāciju tiesības raidīt svešvalodā. Available: https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/cases/?case-filter-years=&case-filter-status=&case-filter-types=&case-filter-result=&searchtext=2003-02-0106Search in Google Scholar

6Constitutional Court of Latvia (2005). Satversmes tiesas spriedums 2005.gada 22.decembrī lietā Nr.2005-19-01. Available: https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/viewer.html?file=/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2005-19-01_spriedums.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

7Constitutional Court of Latvia (2020). Satversmes tiesas spriedums 2021.gada 27.maijā lietā Nr.2020-49-01. Available: https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/viewer.html?file=https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2020_49_01_Spriedums.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

8Constitutional Court of South Africa (2005). Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries International (Finance) B.V. t/a Sabmark International, CCT 42/04, Decided on: 27 May 2005. Available: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2005/7media.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

9Council of Europe (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Available: https://www.unhcr.org/4d93501a9.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

10Court of Justice of the European Union (2010). Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2010 Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE). Available: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=83635&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir= &occ=first&part=1&cid=496261Search in Google Scholar

11Court of Justice of the European Union (2014). Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 3 September 2014, Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others. Available: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-201/13Search in Google Scholar

12European Convention (2000). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Available: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12016P/TXT&from=ESSearch in Google Scholar

13European Court of Human Rights (1994). Casado Coca v Spain. 15450/89. 26.01.1994. Point 35. Available: https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:ihrl/2958echr94.case.1/law-ihrl-2958echr94Search in Google Scholar

14European Court of Human Rights (1976). Handyside v. the United Kingdom. Available: https://legallibrary.crin.org/handyside-v-the-united-kingdom/Search in Google Scholar

15European Court of Human Rights (2005). Vereinigung Bildendert Künstler v. Austria. Available: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-69805%22]}Search in Google Scholar

16European Parliament and Council (2001). Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32001L0029&from=ENSearch in Google Scholar

17German Federal Constitutional Court (2007). The judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court of 13 June 2007 in Case No 1 BvR 1783.05 Esra and Adam v. Beschwerdefuhrerin. Available: https://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv119001.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

18Kučs, A. (2016). Latvijas Republikas Satversmes komentāri. VIII nodaļa. Cilvēka pamattiesības. 100. Ikvienam ir tiesības uz vārda brīvību, kas ietver tiesības brīvi iegūt, paturēt un izplatīt informāciju, paust savus uzskatus. Cenzūra ir aizliegta. Available: http://blogi.lu.lv/tzpi/files/2016/10/100pants.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

19Latviešu literārās valodas vārdnīca. 4.sējums (1980). Rīga: izdevniecība Zinātne 770 lpp.Search in Google Scholar

20Latvijas Republikas Satversmes komentāri VIII nodaļa. Cilvēka pamattiesības. Sagatavojis autoru kolektīvs prof. R. Baloža zinātniskā vadībā. (2011). Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 864 lpp.Search in Google Scholar

21Lagarde, L., Ang, C. (2016). Parody in the UK and France: defined by humour? Available: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/9-625-2313?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=trueSearch in Google Scholar

22Ledru, O. (2020). Lorsque Tintin s’émancipe par la parodie. Available: https://www.avocat-ledru.com/lorsque-tintinsemancipe-par-la-parodie/Search in Google Scholar

23Levits, E. (2022). Valsts prezidenta Egila Levita uzruna Satversmes 100. jubilejas gada atklāšanā Saeimā. Available: https://www.president.lv/lv/jaunums/valsts-prezidenta-egila-levita-uzrunasatversmes-100-jubilejas-gada-atklasana-saeimaSearch in Google Scholar

24Macdonald, D. (1960). Tag: Historical Drama. Available: https://willyorwonthe.wordpress.com/tag/historical-drama/Search in Google Scholar

25Mattila, H. (2019) Parody and Copyright in the European Union Law. Available: https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/118104Search in Google Scholar

26Mouron, Ph. (2021). L’usage transformatif de Tintin “validé” au titre de l’exception de parodie. Availanle: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03446991/documentSearch in Google Scholar

27Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (2023). Definition of parody verb from the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Available: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/parody_2Search in Google Scholar

28Parliament of the Republic of Latvia (Saeima) (2000). Copyright Law. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/5138Search in Google Scholar

29Pleps, J., Pastars, E., Plakane, I. (2014). Konstitucionālās tiesības. Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 448 lpp.Search in Google Scholar

30Supreme Court Senate of Latvia (2012). Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāta Civillietu departamenta 2012.gada 12.septembra spriedums lietā Nr. SKC-482/2012. Available: https://www.at.gov.lv/lv/judikaturas-nolemumu-arhivsold/senata-civillietu-departaments/2012-klasifikators-pec-lietu-kategorijamSearch in Google Scholar

31Terminology Commission of the Latvian Academy of Sciences (2003). Lēmums Nr. 18 Par termina „vārda brīvība“ izpratni un atbilsmi angļu valodas terminam „freedom of expression“. Available: https://termini.gov.lv/komisija/lemums-nr-18-par-termina-varda-briviba-izpratni-un-atbilsmi-anglu-valodas-terminam-freedomSearch in Google Scholar

32United Kingdom Parliament (1988). Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Available: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/introductionSearch in Google Scholar

33United Nations (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/lv/starptautiskie-ligumi/id/705Search in Google Scholar

34United Nations General Assembly (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Available: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/lat.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

35United States Congress (1978). Copyright Act of 1976. Available: https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1072/copyright-act-of-1976Search in Google Scholar

36United States Supreme Court (1993). Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994). Available: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/569/Search in Google Scholar

37United States Supreme Court (2023). Case No. 22-148, Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC. Available: https://www.inta.org/amicus-brief/case-no-22-148-jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc/Search in Google Scholar