[
Antwarg, L., Miller, R.M., Shapira, B. and Rokach, L. (2021). Explaining anomalies detected by autoencoders using Shapley additive explanations, Expert Systems with Applications 186: 115736.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chollet, F. (2017). Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, USA, pp. 1800–1807.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corrales, D.C., Ledezma, A. and Corrales, J.C. (2018). From theory to practice: A data quality framework for classification tasks, Symmetry 10(7): 248.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cuzzocrea, A. (2020). Uncertainty and imprecision in big data management: Models, issues, paradigms, and future research directions, Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Cloud and Big Data Computing, pp. 6–9, (virtual).]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fock, E. (2014). Global sensitivity analysis approach for input selection and system identification purposes—A new framework for feedforward neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 25(8): 1484–1495.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gui, J., Sun, Z., Wen, Y., Tao, D. and Ye, J. (2021). A review on generative adversarial networks: Algorithms, theory, and applications, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 35(4): 3313–3332.]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. and Sun, J. (2016a). Deep residual learning for image recognition, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, USA, pp. 770–778.]Search in Google Scholar
[
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. and Sun, J. (2016b). Identity mappings in deep residual networks, in B. Leibe et al. (Eds.), Computer Vision—ECCV 2016, Springer, Cham, pp. 630–645.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hidaka, A. and Kurita, T. (2017). Consecutive dimensionality reduction by canonical correlation analysis for visualization of convolutional neural networks, Proceedings of the ISCIE International Symposium on Stochastic Systems Theory and Its Applications, Fukuoka, Japan, Vol. 2017, pp. 160–167.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L. and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017). Densely connected convolutional networks, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, USA, pp. 2261–2269.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, Y.-C., Tung, Y.-S., Chen, J.-C., Wang, S.-W. and Wu, J.-L. (2005). An adaptive edge detection based colorization algorithm and its applications, MULTIME-DIA’05: Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Singapore, DOI: 10.1145/1101149.1101223.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeczmionek, E. and Kowalski, P.A. (2021). Flattening layer pruning in convolutional neural networks, Symmetry 13(7): 1147.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kahani, N., Bagherzadeh, M., Cordy, J.R., Dingel, J. and Varró, D. (2019). Survey and classification of model transformation tools, Software & Systems Modeling 18(4): 2361–2397.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keras (2023). Keras Applications, https://keras.io/api/applications/.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kowal, M., Skobel, M. and Nowicki, N. (2018). The feature selection problem in computer-assisted cytology, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 28(4): 759–770, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2018-0058.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kowalski, P.A. and Kusy, M. (2017). Sensitivity analysis for probabilistic neural network structure reduction, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 29(5): 1919–1932.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kowalski, P.A. and Kusy, M. (2018). Determining significance of input neurons for probabilistic neural network by sensitivity analysis procedure, Computational Intelligence 34(3): 895–916.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krizhevsky, A. (2009). Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images, https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~kriz/learning-features-2009-TR.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kusy, M. and Kowalski, P.A. (2018). Weighted probabilistic neural network, Information Sciences 430: 65-76.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kusy, M. and Zajdel, R. (2021). A weighted wrapper approach to feature selection, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 31(4): 685–696, DOI: 10.34768/amcs-2021-0047.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lundberg, S.M. and Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, USA, pp. 4768–4777.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mishkin, D., Sergievskiy, N. and Matas, J. (2017). Systematic evaluation of convolution neural network advances on the imagenet, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 161: 11–19.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Riesz, F. (1910). Untersuchungen uber Systeme integrierbarer Funktionen, Mathematische Annalen 69(4): 449–497.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., Berg, A. and Fei-Fei, L. (2014). Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge, International Journal of Computer Vision 115(2015): 211–252.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. and Tarantola, S. (2010). Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. design and estimator for the total sensitivity index, Computer Physics Communications 181(2): 259–270.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M. and Tarantola, S. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, John Wiley & Sons, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F. and Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models, Wiley, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S. and Chan, K. (2012). A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output, Technometrics 41(1): 39-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saura, J.R. (2021). Using data sciences in digital marketing: Framework, methods, and performance metrics, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 6(2): 92–102.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shi, D., Yeung, D.S. and Gao, J. (2005). Sensitivity analysis applied to the construction of radial basis function networks, Neural Networks 18(7): 951–957.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simonyan, K. and Zisserman, A. (2015). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J. and Wojna, Z. (2016). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, pp. 2818–2826.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tan, M. and Le, Q. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks, International Conference on Machine Learning, Long Beach, USA, pp. 6105–6114.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tzeng, F.-Y. and Ma, K.-L. (2005). Opening the black box-data driven visualization of neural networks, VIS 05: IEEE Visualization, 2005, Minneapolis, USA, pp. 383–390.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xiao, H., Rasul, K. and Vollgraf, R. (2017). Fashion-MNIST: A novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms, arXiv: 1708.07747.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xie, S., Girshick, R., Dollar, P., Tu, Z. and He, K. (2017). Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, USA, pp. 5987–5995.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yamashita, R., Nishio, M., Do, R.K.G. and Togashi, K. (2018). Convolutional neural networks: An overview and application in radiology, Insights into Imaging 9(4): 611–629.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zurada, J.M., Malinowski, A. and Usui, S. (1997). Perturbation method for deleting redundant inputs of perceptron networks, Neurocomputing 14(2): 177–193.]Search in Google Scholar
