“Dongsun” denotes a folk term for an edible
“Dongsun” has been artificially cultivated in Guizhou, China, and represents one of the edible mushroom species domesticated in China over the last decade (Li et al. 2023). It is currently cultivated similarly to the
As production and its scale expand, issues such as slow mycelium growth, low production efficiency, and a high contamination rate have become increasingly apparent in the strain production process (Zhang et al. 2021). In previous studies, glucose, fructose, and brown sugar have been identified as favorable carbon sources for
In this study, we investigated the effects of carbon sources, nitrogen sources, inorganic salts, suspending agents, and incubation temperature on the biological characteristics of
All experimental materials were sourced from a consistent supplier and were newly acquired for each use to guarantee substrate stability and uniformity. Brown sugar, wheat bran, carrot powder, potato starch, corn starch, wheat starch, and soybean powder, identified as natural substrates, were procured from Xinghua Lüshuai Food Co., Ltd., (China). Wood powder, a natural substrate, was sourced from Caoxian Luyi Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (China). The following reagents, all of the analytical grade, were acquired from Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (China): KH2PO4, K2HPO4 · 3H2O, MgSO4 · 7H2O, MgCl2 · 6H2O, ZnSO4, CaCl2, CaSO4 · 2H2O, Fe2(SO4)3, CaCO3, NH4Cl, (NH4)2SO4, KNO3, NaNO3, carbamide, glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, lactose, cellulose, xylogen, chitosan, dimethyl sulfoxide, and Tween 80. Additionally, all the analytical grade, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium alginate, gum arabic, and xanthan gum were purchased from Tianjin Yongda Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (China). Furthermore, biochemical reagents such as peptone, yeast powder, yeast extract, beef extract, and soybean powder were procured from Shanghai Bowei Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (China).
Potatoes (200 g) were peeled, sliced thinly, boiled in water until they reached a soft yet firm consistency, and subsequently strained to extract the juice. The extracted juice, along with dextrose (20 g) and agar (20 g), was mixed, and the volume was adjusted to 1000 ml, ensuring the maintenance of the natural pH.
After preparing the medium, it was sterilized at 121°C for 30 minutes, then cooled and aliquoted into 90 mm petri dishes, with a volume of 20 ml/dish. Following solidification, the medium was inoculated with a
This study aimed to investigate the effects of various natural substrates on the biological properties of
Following prior research outcomes, this study examined the impact of various suspension agents on the medium’s physical state and the biological properties of
In light of prior experimental outcomes, various carbon sources were evaluated for their effects on the biological properties of
Drawing upon the findings from previous experiments, diverse nitrogen sources were investigated for their influence on the biological properties of
Following the outcomes of preceding experiments, various inorganic salts were investigated for their influence on the biological characteristics of
The Plackett-Burman design was employed to identify components that had significant influence on medium optimization. Two natural substrates, one suspension agent, one carbon source, one nitrogen source, and two inorganic salts were investigated for their impact on colony diameter. Utilizing the Plackett-Burman design, a 12-run experiment was conducted to evaluate nine factors, including two virtual variables. Each factor was set at two levels: -1 representing the low level and +1 representing the high level, with the high level being 1.5 times the magnitude of the low level (refer to Table I).
Range of factors investigated using Plackett-Burman design.
Symbol | Variables | Experimental value | |
---|---|---|---|
Low (-1) | High (+1) | ||
X1 | Glucose (g/l) | 10 | 15 |
X2 | Wheat starch (g/l) | 5 | 7.5 |
X3 | Virtual 1 | -1 | +1 |
X4 | Carrot powder (g/l) | 5 | 7.5 |
X5 | Soybean powder (g/l) | 10 | 15 |
X6 | Virtual 2 | -1 | +1 |
X7 | ZnSO4 (g/l) | 0.5 | 0.75 |
X8 | NH4Cl (g/l) | 0.5 | 0.75 |
X9 | Virtual 3 | -1 | +1 |
Based on the results of the Plackett-Burman design, the steepest ascent method was applied to ZnSO4 and NH4Cl to determine the centroid of the response surface design. The main effects, significance, step size, and direction of change of the factors were analyzed through the regression equation of the Plackett-Burman design model.
Based on the single-factor design, Plackett-Burman design, and steepest ascent path design, a response surface methodology (central composite design, CCD) encompassing 20 runs was employed. The variables tested (soybean powder, ZnSO4, NH4Cl) were designated as A, B, and C, respectively, and were evaluated at five distinct levels, incorporating factorial points (-1, +1), axial points (-1.6818, +1.6818), and a central point (0), as depicted in Table II.
Factors and levels of response surface central composite design.
Symbol | Variables | Code level | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-1.6828 | –1 | 0 | 1 | 1.6818 | ||
Soybean powder (g/l) | 5.80 | 7.50 | 10 | 12.50 | 14.20 | |
ZnSO4 (g/l) | 0.45 | 0.63 | 0.88 | 1.13 | 1.30 | |
NH4Cl (g/l) | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 0.98 |
Building upon the outcomes of preceding experiments, the impact of varying temperatures on the biological characteristics of
Each experiment was conducted with five replicates. Upon completion of the cultivation period, the colony diameter resulting from mycelial elongation was measured using the criss-cross method. For colonies exhibiting incomplete diameters, measurements were recorded at their widest points (Zhang et al. 2021). Furthermore, the mycelial growth rate was calculated employing the subsequent mathematical equation (1).
Colony diameter and mycelial growth rate were presented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD). An analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, was utilized to conduct multiple comparisons for significant differences at
The effect of natural substrates on the biological properties was investigated. Adding wood powder to the medium resulted in the fastest mycelial growth and largest colony diameter (0.85 ± 0.13 mm/d), followed by wheat bran, wheat starch, and carrot powder. However, the differences among these substrates were not statistically significant. Upon adding carrot powder, mycelial growth was observed to be both dense and vigorous, in contrast to the other test groups, which exhibited either dense or moderately dense growth. Adding carrot powder, wood powder, and wheat bran to the medium facilitated the most vigorous mycelial growth. The poorest mycelial growth was observed with the addition of potato powder. Considering colony diameter, growth density, and overall mycelial development, the incorporation of wheat bran, wood powder, wheat starch, and carrot powder into the medium proved to be beneficial for the growth of
Effects of natural substances on the growth of
A – control group, B – peeled potato, C – carrot powder, D – wood powder, E – wheat bran, F – potato powder, G – corn starch, H – wheat starch
Effects of composite natural substances on the growth of
A – FA0, B – FA1, C – FA2, D – FA3, E – FA4, F – FA5, G – FA6, H – FA7
Effects of natural substances on the growth of
Natural substance | Colony diameter (mm) | Mycelium growth rate (mm/d) | Colony density | Hyphal growth |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control group | 29.64 ± 7.07de | 0.44 ± 0.13de | # | ++ |
Peeled potato | 20.75 ± 0.79e | 0.28 ± 0.01e | ## | + |
Carrot powder | 42.17 ± 3.23bcd | 0.66 ± 0.06bcd | ### | +++ |
Wood powder | 54.75 ± 5.1a | 0.88 ± 0.09a | ## | +++ |
Wheat bran | 52.71 ± 7.22ab | 0.85 ± 0.13ab | ## | ++++ |
Potato starch | 37.63 ± 3.63bcd | 0.58 ± 0.06bcd | # | + |
Corn starch | 37.58 ± 5.35bcd | 0.58 ± 0.10bcd | # | + |
Wheat starch | 48.12 ± 9.48abc | 0.77 ± 0.17abc | ## | ++ |
Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level
#– sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth
Effects of composite natural substances on the growth of
Test group | Natural substance (g/l) | Colony diameter (mm) | Mycelium growth rate (mm/d) | Colony density | Hyphal growth | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peeled potato | Wheat starch | Carrot powder | Wood powder | |||||
FA0 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26.78 ± 4.76c | 0.38 ± 0.09c | ### | ++ |
FA1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 56.19 ± 6.44b | 0.91 ± 0.12b | ## | +++ |
FA2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 51.57 ± 7.10b | 0.83 ± 0.13b | ## | +++ |
FA3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 34.34 ± 4.57c | 0.52 ± 0.08c | # | ++ |
FA4 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 67.07 ± 4.79a | 1.10 ± 0.09a | # | +++ |
FA5 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 52.35 ± 5.21b | 0.84 ± 0.09b | ### | ++++ |
FA6 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 56.19 ± 8.14b | 0.91 ± 0.15b | # | ++++ |
FA7 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 50.66 ± 9.46b | 0.81 ± 0.17b | ## | +++ |
Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level
# – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth
When suspension agents were added to the medium,
Effects of suspension agents on the physical state of the medium and the growth of
A – control group, B – sodium carboxylmethyl cellulose, C – sodium alginate, D – dimethyl sulfoxide, E – Tween 80, F – gum arabic, G – xanthan gum
Effects of xanthan gum concentration on the physical state of the medium and the growth of
A – Control group, B – 0.5 g/l, C – 1.0 g/l, D – 1.5 g/l, E – 2.0 g/l, F – 2.5 g/l, G – 3.0 g/l
Effects of suspension agents on the physical state of the medium and the growth of
Suspension agent | Medium physical state | Colony diameter (mm) | Mycelium growth rate (mm/d) | Colony density | Hyphal growth |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control group | Sediment | 44.45 ± 6.Γ’ | 0.70 ± 0.11** | ## | +++ |
Sodium carboxylmethyl cellulose (g/l) | Unstable suspension | 45.05 ± 8.48* | 0.72 ± 0.15* | ## | ++++ |
Sodium alginate (g/l) | Unstable suspension | 44.10 ± 8.64* | 0.70 ± 0.15* | ### | ++++ |
Dimethyl sulfoxide (ml/l) | Sediment | 33.11 ± 8.35c | 0.50 ± 0.15c | ## | ++++ |
Tween 80 (ml/l) | Sediment | 38.95 ± 6.89bc | 0.61 ± 0.12bc | # | ++++ |
Gum arabic (g/l) | Unstable suspension | 50.73 ± 5.4a | 0.82 ± 0.1a | ## | ++++ |
Xanthan gum (g/l) | Stable suspension, high viscosity | 48.03 ± 6.06* | 0.77 ± 0.11* | ### | ++++ |
Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level
# – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth
Effects of xanthan gum concentration on the physical state of the medium and the growth of
Xanthan gum (g/l) | Medium physical state | Colony diameter (mm) | Mycelium growth rate (mm/d) | Colony density | Hyphal growth |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control group | Sediment | 60.41 ± 7.95a | 0.98 ± 0.14a | ## | +++ |
0.5 | Stable suspension, Suitable viscosity | 65.34 ± 6.52a | 1.08 ± 0.12a | ## | +++ |
1.0 | Stable suspension, Suitable viscosity | 66.04 ± 5.46a | 1.09 ± 0.10a | ## | +++ |
1.5 | Stable suspension, Higher viscosity | 62.63 ± 7.24a | 1.03 ± 0.13a | ## | +++ |
2.0 | Stable suspension, Higher viscosity | 61.06 ± 5.46a | 1.00 ± 0.10a | ## | +++ |
2.5 | Stable suspension, high viscosity | 56.23 ± 6.40a | 0.91 ± 0.11a | ## | +++ |
3.0 | Stable suspension, high viscosity | 60.68 ± 4.23a | 0.99 ± 0.08a | # | +++ |
Small letter in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level
# – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth
When glucose, maltose, and cellulose were utilized as carbon sources in the culture,
Effects of carbon sources on the growth of
A – control group, B – glucose, C – fructose, D – sucrose, E – maltose, F – lactose, G – brown sugar, H – cellulose, I – xylogen, J – chitosan
Effects of carbon sources on the growth of
Carbon source (g/l) | Colony diameter (mm) | Mycelium growth rate (mm/d) | Colony density | Hyphal growth |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control group | 36.84 ± 1.29bcd | 0.56 ± 0.02bcd | ## | ++ |
Glucose | 48.32 ± 3.63a | 0.77 ± 0.06a | ### | +++ |
Fructose | 37.92 ± 6.61bcd | 0.58 ± 0.12bcd | ## | ++ |
Sucrose | 32.43 ± 3.27d | 0.49 ± 0.06d | ## | +++ |
Maltose | 48.18 ± 2.97ab | 0.77 ± 0.05ab | ### | +++ |
Lactose | 37.13 ± 6.36bcd | 0.57 ± 0.11bcd | ### | ++ |
Brown sugar | 36.57 ± 4.02cd | 0.56 ± 0.07cd | ## | +++ |
Cellulose | 47.89 ± 5.17abc | 0.76 ± 0.09abc | ## | +++ |
Xylogen | 0.00 ± 0.00f | 0.00 ± 0.00f | n.d. | n.d. |
Chitosan | 18.07 ± 6.54e | 0.23 ± 0.12e | ## | + |
Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level
# – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth, n.d. – no data for the experimental group
Nitrogen source screening experiments demonstrated that the NaNO3 exhibited the fastest mycelial growth rate (0.74 ± 0.09 mm/d), with vigorous growth, yet the colony density was notably sparse. In contrast, the soybean powder demonstrated a faster mycelial growth rate (0.69 ± 0.09 mm/d), experiencing vigorous growth and dense colonies; however, the difference from the NaNO3 was minimal. Adding peptone, yeast powder, yeast paste, and carbamide to the culture medium significantly inhibited the growth of
Effects of nitrogen sources on the growth of
A – control group, B – peptone, C – yeast powder, D – yeast extract, E – beef extract, F – soybean powder, G – KNO3, G – carbamide, I – NH4Cl, J – (NH4)2SO4, K – NaNO3
Effects of nitrogen sources on the growth of
Nitrogen source (g/l) | Colony diameter (mm) | Mycelium growth rate (mm/d) | Colony density | Hyphal growth |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control group | 36.01 ± 5.30c | 0.55 ± 0.09c | ## | +++ |
Peptone | 19.16 ± 4.26cd | 0.25 ± 0.08cd | ## | + |
Yeast powder | 9.16 ± 2.35cd | 0.07 ± 0.04cd | ## | + |
Yeast extract | 5.72 ± 0.63d | 0.01 ± 0.01d | # | + |
Beef extract | 39.86 ± 5.18* | 0.62 ± 0.09* | ## | ++ |
Soybean powder | 44.18 ± 5.17* | 0.69 ± 0.09* | ### | +++ |
KNO3 | 40.62 ± 4.33* | 0.63 ± 0.08* | ## | +++ |
Carbamide | 5.70 ± 0.16d | 0.01 ± 0.00d | # | + |
NH4Cl | 37.73 ± 5.98* | 0.58 ± 0.11* | ## | ++ |
(NH4)2SO4 | 35.66 ± 3.32b | 0.54 ± 0.06b | ## | ++ |
NaNO3 | 46.49 ± 5.31a | 0.74 ± 0.09a | # | +++ |
Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level
# – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth
Inorganic salt screening experiments indicated that the ZnSO4 exhibited the fastest mycelial growth rate (0.80 ± 0.16 mm/d), characterized by vigorous growth, and was followed by NH4Cl (0.76 ± 0.13 mm/d) and Fe2(SO4)3 (0.65 ± 0.18 mm/d). Incorporating MgSO4 · 7H2O and CaCO3 into the culture medium significantly inhibited the growth of
Effects of inorganic salts on the growth of
A – control group, B – KH2PO4, C – K2HPO4 · 3H2O, D – MgSO4 · 7H2O, E – MgCl2 · 6H2O, F – ZnSO4, G – CaCl2, H – CaSO4 · 2H2O, I – Fe2(SO4)3, J – CaCO3, K – NH4Cl, L – KNO3
Effects of composite inorganic salts on the growth of
A – FM-A, B – FM-B, C – FM-C, D – FM-D, E – FM-E, F – FM-F, G – FM-G, H – FM-H
Effects of inorganic salts on the growth of
Inorganic salt (g/l) | Colony diameter (mm) | Mycelium growth rate (mm/d) | Colony density | Hyphal growth |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control group | 40.00 ± 7.53abc | 0.62 ± 0.13abc | ## | +++ |
KH2PO4 | 33.66 ± 8.64bcd | 0.51 ± 0.15bcd | ## | +++ |
K2HPO4·3H2O | 36.14 ± 5.64bcd | 0.55 ± 0.10bcd | ### | ++ |
MgSO4·7H2O | 29.51 ± 4.16cd | 0.43 ± 0.07cd | ## | ++ |
MgCl2·6H2O | 39.37 ± 4.56abc | 0.61 ± 0.08abc | ## | ++ |
ZnSO4 | 50.14 ± 9.16a | 0.80 ± 0.16a | ### | ++++ |
CaCl2 | 37.11 ± 8.19abc | 0.57 ± 0.15abc | ### | +++ |
CaSO4·2H2O | 37.09 ± 4.72abcd | 0.57 ± 0.08*cd | # | ++ |
Fe2(SO4)3 | 41.85 ± 9.97abc | 0.65 ± 0.18abc | ### | ++++ |
CaCO3 | 20.79 ± 2.32d | 0.28 ± 0.04d | # | + |
NH4Cl | 48.00 ± 7.14ab | 0.76 ± 0.13* | ### | +++ |
KNO3 | 40.40 ± 6.27abc | 0.63 ± 0.11** | ### | ++ |
Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level
# – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth
Effects of composite inorganic salt on the growth of
Test group | Inorganic salt (g/l) | Colony diameter (mm) | Mycelium growth rate (mm/d) | Colony density | Hyphal growth | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnSO4 | Fe2(SO4)3 | NH4Cl | |||||
FM-A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42.23 ± 8.15b | 0.66 ± 0.15b | ## | ++ |
FM-B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.04 ± 4.62ab | 0.80 ± 0.08ab | ### | +++ |
FM-C | 0 | 1 | 0 | 39.01 ± 2.45b | 0.61 ± 0.04b | ## | ++ |
FM-D | 0 | 0 | 1 | 39.07 ± 0.24ab | 0.61 ± 0.00ab | ## | ++ |
FM-E | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 49.51 ± 6.03ab | 0.79 ± 0.11ab | ### | ++ |
FM-F | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 61.10 ± 7.26a | 1.00 ± 0.13a | ### | ++++ |
FM-G | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 50.05 ± 8.99ab | 0.80 ± 0.16ab | ### | ++ |
FM-H | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 44.52 ± 5.92b | 0.71 ± 0.11b | ### | +++ |
Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level
# – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth
The data indicated that process optimization plays a crucial role in enhancing the efficiency of colony diameter (Table XI). Analysis of the regression coefficients for 9 factors (Table XII) revealed that
Plackett-Burman design and response values.
Run | Variables | Y Colony diameter (mm) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 49.92 ± 3.47 |
2 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 59.97 ± 6.54 |
3 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 74.45 ± 3.25 |
4 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 60.35 ± 2.28 |
5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 59.05 ± 4.68 |
6 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 61.95 ± 5.93 |
7 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 63.52 ± 4.59 |
8 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 58.35 ± 4.82 |
9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 62.39 ± 4.49 |
10 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 53.93 ± 6.15 |
11 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 50.62 ± 4.74 |
12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 48.70 ± 2.69 |
Results of the regression analysis of the Plackett–Burman design.
Source | Coefficient estimate | df | Sum of squares | Means quares | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 58.60 | 6 | 486.42 | 81.07 | 5.14 | 0.0464* |
1.28 | 1 | 19.53 | 19.53 | 1.24 | 0.3162 | |
-1.11 | 1 | 14.90 | 14.90 | 0.9453 | 0.3756 | |
-0.0640 | 1 | 0.0491 | 0.0491 | 0.0031 | 0.9576 | |
-1.36 | 1 | 22.24 | 22.24 | 1.41 | 0.2882 | |
5.17 | 1 | 321.04 | 321.04 | 20.37 | 0.0063** | |
3.01 | 1 | 108.66 | 108.66 | 6.90 | 0.0468* | |
Residual | 5 | 78.79 | ||||
Cor Total | 11 | 565.20 |
* – significant at 0.05 level, ** – significant at 0.01 level
Experimental design and results of the steepest ascent path.
Factor level | Inorganic salt (g/l) | Colony diameter (mm) | Mycelium growth rate (mm/d) | Colony density | Hyphal growth | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnSO4 | NH4Cl | |||||
Step size ( |
0.125 | 0.073 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
Origin ( |
0.5 | 0.5 | 48.13 ± 3.00 | 0.77 ± 0.05 | ### | +++ |
0.625 | 0.573 | 52.99 ± 5.85 | 0.85 ± 0.10 | ### | +++ | |
0.750 | 0.646 | 54.20 ± 7.01 | 0.87 ± 0.13 | ### | +++ | |
0.875 | 0.719 | 61.07 ± 2.20 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | ### | ++++ | |
1.000 | 0.792 | 60.43 ± 10.18 | 0.99 ± 0.18 | ### | ++++ | |
1.125 | 0.865 | 59.56 ± 4.15 | 0.88 ± 0.30 | ### | ++++ | |
1.250 | 0.938 | 48.82 ± 4.68 | 078 ± 0.08 | ### | ++++ | |
1.375 | 1.011 | 51.52 ± 9.49 | 0.83 ± 0.17 | ### | +++ | |
1.500 | 1.084 | 32.24 ± 6.24 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | ### | ++ | |
1.625 | 1.157 | 35.39 ± 12.32 | 0.54 ± 0.22 | ### | +++ | |
1.75 | 1.230 | 29.47 ± 15.78 | 0.43 ± 0.28 | ## | + | |
1.875 | 1.303 | 26.49 ± 8.02 | 0.38 ± 0.14 | ## | + | |
2.00 | 1.376 | 23.38 ± 7.40 | 0.32 ± 0.13 | ## | + |
# – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth, n.d. – no data for the experimental group
Based on the coefficients from the colony diameter regression equation derived from the Plackett-Burman design model, the steepest ascent path for optimizing colony diameter involved primarily adjusting the levels of ZnSO4 and NH4Cl. The magnitude and direction of changes were dictated by the regression equation from the Plackett-Burman design model, as illustrated in Table XIII. Colony diameter reached its peak at the “
To assess the impact of medium components on colony diameter, an evaluation involving soybean powder, ZnSO4, and NH4Cl was conducted using a response surface optimization experiment. Detailed experimental designs and results are presented in Table XIV. A regression analysis was conducted to align the response function with the experimental data. Based on the variables presented in Table XV, the model, denoted as equation (2), articulates the colony diameter (
Response surface central composite design and matching results.
Run | Variables | Y Colony diameter (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | ||
1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 64.56 ± 5.88 |
2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 54.69 ± 4.98 |
3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 62.58 ± 7.79 |
4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 54.35 ± 7.41 |
5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 63.78 ± 5.37 |
6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 59.50 ± 4.29 |
7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 59.59 ± 9.21 |
8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 54.91 ± 3.34 |
9 | -1.6818 | 0 | 0 | 63.33 ± 3.93 |
10 | 1.6818 | 0 | 0 | 53.13 ± 4.86 |
11 | 0 | -1.6818 | 0 | 62.65 ± 4.13 |
12 | 0 | 1.6818 | 0 | 59.95 ± 4.14 |
13 | 0 | 0 | -1.6818 | 60.88 ± 1.57 |
14 | 0 | 0 | 1.6818 | 58.10 ± 4.80 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62.62 ± 2.36 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61.43 ± 1.60 |
17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61.72 ± 7.81 |
18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64.65 ± 4.31 |
19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59.99 ± 2.18 |
20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61.76 ± 1.83 |
A, B and C code values are shown in Table II
The
Two-dimensional contour plots of response surface on mycelial growth of
a – soybean powder vs. ZnSO4, b – soybean powder vs. NH4Cl, c – ZnSO4 vs. NH4Cl
ANOVA for response surface quadratic polynomial model.
Source | df | Sum of squares | Means quares | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Modle | 215.88 | 9 | 23.99 | 13.54 | 0.0002** |
143.14 | 1 | 143.14 | 80.81 | < 0.0001** | |
17.91 | 1 | 17.91 | 10.11 | 0.0098** | |
0.6925 | 1 | 0.6925 | 0.3910 | 0.5458 | |
AB | 0.1922 | 1 | 0.1922 | 0.1085 | 0.7487 |
AC | 10.44 | 1 | 10.44 | 5.89 | 0.0356* |
BC | 5.22 | 1 | 5.22 | 2.94 | 0.1169 |
28.37 | 1 | 28.37 | 16.02 | 0.0025** | |
1.46 | 1 | 1.46 | 0.8214 | 0.3861 | |
13.22 | 1 | 13.22 | 7.46 | 0.0211* | |
Residual | 17.71 | 10 | 1.77 | ||
Lack of Fit | 5.81 | 5 | 1.16 | 0.4882 | 0.7750 |
Pure Error | 11.90 | 5 | 2.38 | ||
Cor Total | 233.60 | 19 | |||
0.9242 | |||||
Adjusted |
0.8559 |
* – significant at 0.05 level, ** – significant at 0.01 level
The impact of various temperatures on the biological characteristics of
Effects of different temperature on colony diameter and mycelial growth rate of
Effects of different temperature on mycelial growth of
A – 5°C, B – 10°C, C – 15°C, D – 20°C, E – 25°C, F – 30°C, G – 35°C
This investigation focused on how medium nutrients, the physical state of the medium, and temperature gradients influence the biological characteristics of
According to previous studies, organic nitrogen sources, particularly yeast paste, and peptone, foster denser and more rapidly growing mycelium than inorganic nitrogen sources (Zhang et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2022). This research found NaNO3 to accelerate mycelial growth, while soya flour contributed to denser and thicker mycelium. Conversely, peptone, yeast powder, yeast paste, and urea were found to inhibit mycelial growth. Inorganic salt screening indicated that ZnSO4, Fe2(SO4)3, and NH4Cl enhanced
Upon incorporating sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and sodium alginate into the liquid medium,
In the one-factor temperature test, mycelial growth rate and momentum initially increased and decreased as the temperature rose. At the optimal temperature of 25°C, the mycelium exhibited its fastest growth; at temperatures below 5°C, growth ceased, and at temperatures above 35°C, the mycelium perished, aligning with the findings of Luo and Chen (2016). The study demonstrated that temperature stress altered the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) in macrofungal mycelium. This imbalance in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism and subsequent accumulation of free radicals inhibited mycelial growth, as Liu et al. (2010) observed.
This study evaluated the composition, physical state, and temperature gradient of the