Tuberculosis (TB) is considered to be a highly contagious disease, causing thousands of deaths globally (Sousa et al. 2020). It is caused mainly by
5% of first-line DR-MTB cases progress to multi-drug resistant tuberculosis, which can progress to extreme drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) (Madrazo-Moya et al. 2019).
The main two types of drug resistance in
Resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs is mainly associated with the infective TB control programs. Consequently, this has affected control efforts made by countries with a lack of accessibility to second-line anti-TB drugs. The reasons were insufficient therapy, low patient compliance, reduced drug supply, and unsuitable treatment routines (Urassa et al. 2008).
According to the data released in 2018 by World Health Organization, approximately 10 million people developed TB in 2017. Three and half percent of newly diagnosed and 18% of retreated TB cases were identified as multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB (WHO 2018).
Iraq is one of the countries in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region (WHO-EMR), which has a population of approximately 38 million with a TB incidence rate of 42 per 100,000 (WHO 2018). It places Iraq in the top seven countries within the WHO-EMR for TB incidence, i.e., 3% of total TB cases (WHO 2009).
The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of TB to understand the problem of DR-MTB and the issues related to its spread. It would help determine the high-risk population for drug-resistant TB, develop procedures to stop the spread, and provide effective management for future TB control.
The study was based on the TB patient’s data collected from the Advisory Clinic for Chest Diseases and Respiratory (ACCDR) in the Basra province (Fig. 1) from January 2016 to December 2020. A total of 2,296 newly diagnosed and 246 retreated TB patients, including 1,199 females and 1,343 males aged 4–87 years, were recruited in this study. Patients were from urban areas (city centers and surrounding areas with a high population density) and rural areas (countryside with a low population density). The study was approved by the Research and Development and Ethic Committee/Health Authority and the Advisory Clinic for Chest Diseases and Respiratory in the Basra province. Because of the retrospective nature of this study, which started several years ago, there was difficulty obtaining informed consent. In such circumstances, informed consent was not obtained, and all patients’ records were deidentified before analysis.
Fig. 1
Districts of Basra Governorate.

The patients were clinically diagnosed with CCDR, and sputum samples were examined microscopically for acid-fast bacilli (AFB), cultured on Lowenstein-Jensen solid medium, and subjected to conventional drug susceptibility tests (Mankhi et al. 2009). For the rifampicin resistance test, the samples were processed with the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Cepheid, USA).
The patients were classified into different categories and subjected to epidemiological analysis. The clinical and demographic features of enrolled patients based on age, sex, smoking, chest X-ray appearance, regions, and type of TB were gathered.
square test, and a
Table I clarifies the clinical and demographic characteristics of the study enrolled patients. Out of 2,296 newly diagnosed patients, 54 (2.4%) were drug-resistant TB, whereas among retreated cases, 50 (20.3%) patients represented drug-resistant TB. Among the newly diagnosed drug-resistant TB cases, there were more females (53.7%) than males (46.3%), more non-smokers (75.9%) than smokers (24.1%), and more pulmonary TB (98.1%) than extrapulmonary (1.9%). Additionally, most newly diagnosed drug-resistant TB – 52 cases (96.3%) were from three age groups: 15–34 years – 21 (38.9%), 35–54 years – 12 (22.2%), and more than 55 years – 19 patients (35.2%). The distribution of age, sex, smoking, etc., among treated drug-resistant TB cases was similar to the newly diagnosed cases (Table I).
When comparing new drug-susceptible TB cases to newly diagnosed drug-resistant TB cases, it might be observed that more patients were at the age of 15–34 years old (OR: 0.788, 95% CI: 0.420–1.479), and more numerous were females (OR: 1.324, 95% CI: 0.771–2.275). Also, newly diagnosed drug-resistant TB were more likely to be pulmonary TB (OR: 52.062, 95% CI: 7.187–377.129,
New TB cases were more likely to be diagnosed within patients at the age of 15–34 years (OR: 1.613, 95% CI: 1.166–2.233,
The cavitary disease was associated with retreated cases more often than in patients with new TB cases (OR: 0.372, 95% CI: 0.256–0.541
In new TB cases, pulmonary drug-resistant TB occurred with a higher probability and risk than extra-pulmonary drug-resistant TB (OR: 52.062, 95% CI: 7.187–377.129,
The new patients from urban areas had a higher risk and more probability of developing resistance (OR: 1.939, 95% CI: 1.12–3.358,
Demographic and clinical characteristics of new and retreated tuberculosis patients, Basra, Iraq, 2016-2020.
New cases | Retreated cases | New cases vs. Retreated cases | Primary DR-TB vs. Acquired DR | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | Total n = 2296 | DR-TB n = 54 (2.4) | Susceptible TB n = 2242 (97.6) | OR (95% CI) | p-value | Total n = 246 | DR-TB n = 50 (20.3) | Susceptible TBn=196 (79.7) | OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
Age | ||||||||||||||
< 14 | 254 | 2 | 252 | 0.233 | 0.051 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.431 | 0.576 | 7.748 | <0.0001 | 3.974 | 0.384 |
(11) | (3.7) | (11.23) | (0.054-1.008) | (2) | (2.6) | (0.023-8.207) | (3.109-19.308) | (0.178-89.003) | ||||||
15-34 | 804 | 21 | 783 | 0.788 | 0.458 | 76 | 19 | 57 | 1.622 | 0.212 | 1.613 | 0.004 | 0.873 | 0.771 |
(35) | (38.9) | (34.9) | (0.420-1.479) | (30.8) | (38) | (29.1) | (0.758-3.470) | (1.166-2.233) | (0.348-2.186) | |||||
35-54 | 661 | 12 | 649 | 0.543 | 0.102 | 77 | 16 | 61 | 1.277 | 0.541 | 1.309 | 0.105 | 0.592 | 0.308 |
(28.7) | (22.2) | (28.9) | (0.261-1.129) | (31.3) | (32) | (31.12) | (0.584-2.791) | (0.945-1.813) | (0.216-1.624) | |||||
>55 | 577 | 19 | 558 | Ref. | Ref. | 88 | 15 | 73 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(25.1) | (35.2) | (24.9) | (35.7) | (30) | (37.2) | |||||||||
Sex | ||||||||||||||
Female | 1076 | 29 | 1047 | 1.324 | 0.310 | 123 | 25 | 98 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.882 | 0.349 | 1.16 | 0.706 |
(46.8) | (53.7) | (46.7) | (0.771-2.275) | (50) | (50) | (50) | (0.537-1.861) | (0.678-1.147) | (0.537-2.506) | |||||
Male | 1220 | 25 | 1195 | Ref. | Ref. | 123 | 25 | 98 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref |
(53.1) | (46.3) | (53.3) | (50) | (50) | (50). | |||||||||
Smoking | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 580 | 13 | 567 | 0.937 | 0.839 | 70 | 15 | 55 | 1.099 | 0.786 | 0.850 | 0.276 | 0.740 | 0.497 |
(25.3) | (24.1) | (25.3) | (0.498-1.761) | (28.4) | (30) | (28.1) | (0.556-2.170) | (0.634-1.139) | (0.310-1.764) | |||||
No | 1716 | 41 | 1675 | Ref. | Ref. | 176 | 35 | 141 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(74.7) | (75.9) | (74.7) | (71.5) | (70) | (71.9) | |||||||||
Cavity | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 710 | 32 | 678 | 1.018 | 0.950 | 153 | 39 | 114 | 0.958 | 0.917 | 0.372 | <0.0001 | 0.391 | 0.038 |
(30.9) | (59.6) | (30.6) | (0.580-1.788) | (62.1) | (78) | (58.2) | (0.428-2.150) | (0.256-0.541) | (0.161-0.948) | |||||
No | 474 | 21 | 453 | Ref. | Ref. | 38 | 1 | 28 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(20.6) | (38.9) | (20.2) | (15.4) | (20) | (14.3) | |||||||||
Infiltration | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 308 | 13 | 295 | 0.921 | 0.801 | 50 | 13 | 37 | 1.025 | 0.948 | 0.992 | 0.962 | 0.9 | 0.817 |
(13.4) | (24.1) | (13.2) | (0.486-1.746) | (20.3) | (26) | (18.9) | (0.490-2.140) | (0.700-1.404) | (0.369-2.194) | |||||
No | 876 | 4 | 836 | Ref. | Ref. | 141 | 36 | 105 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(38.1) | (74.1) | (37.3) | (57.3) | (72) | (53.6) | |||||||||
Other abnormalities | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 142 | 6 | 136 | 0.934 | 0.878 | 23 | 6 | 17 | 1.026 | 0.960 | 0.995 | 0.985 | 0.915 | 0.885 |
(6.1) | (11.1) | (6.04) | (0.392-2.226) | (9.3) | (12) | (8.7) | (0.380-2.770) | (0.622-1.592) | (0.274-3.052) | |||||
No | 1042 | 47 | 995 | Ref. | Ref. | 168 | 43 | 125 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(45.3) | (87) | (44.4) | (68.2) | (86) | (63.8) | |||||||||
Clear | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7.23 | 0.089 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.879 | 0.598 | 1.46 | 0.800 | 2.829 | 0.527 |
(0.17) | (1.9) | (0.13) | (0.739-70.71) | (0.056-147.03) | (0.078-27.227) | (0.113-71.087) | ||||||||
No | 118 | 52 | 1128 | Ref. | Ref. | 191 | 49 | 142 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(51.3) | (96.3) | (50.3) | (77.6) | (98) | (72.4) | |||||||||
Type | ||||||||||||||
Extra | 1112 | 1 | 1111 | Ref. | Ref. | 55 | 1 | 54 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
pulmonary TB | (48.4) | (1.9) | (49.6) | (22.3) | (2) | (27.6) | ||||||||
Pulmonary TB | 118 | 53 | 1131 | 52.062 | 0.0001 | 191 | 49 | 142 | 18.634 | 0.004 | 0.307 | <0.0001 | 1.082 | 0.956 |
(51.5) | (98.1) | (50.4) | (7.19-377.13) | (77.6) | (98) | (72.4) | (2.51-138.31) | (0.225-0.418) | (0.066-17.768) | |||||
Region | ||||||||||||||
Urban | 993 | 32 | 961 | 1.939 | 0.018 | 87 | 27 | 60 | 2.661 | 0.003 | 1.393 | 0.018 | 1.239 | 0.589 |
(43.2) | (59.3) | (42.9) | (1.12-3.358) | (35.3) | (54) | (30.6) | (1.412-5.015) | (1.059-1.832) | (0.570-2.965) | |||||
Rural | 1303 | 2 | 1281 | Ref. | Ref. | 159 | 23 | 136 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(56.7) | (40.7) | (57.1) | (64.6) | (46) | (69.4) |
OR –Odds Ratio, TB –Tuberculosis, DR-TB –Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, CI –Confidence Intervals
Primary and acquired drug resistance profiles of
Drug resistance | New cases n = 2296 (%) | Retreated cases n = 246 (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
DR-TB | 54 (2.4) | 50 (20.3) | 0.0001 |
Any resistance to first-line drugs | |||
INH | 23 (1) | 42(17.1) | 0.0001 |
RIF | 18 (0.78) | 39 (15.8) | 0.0001 |
EMB | 13 (0.56) | 21 (8.5) | 0.011 |
SM | 30 (1.3) | 24 (9.75) | 0.007 |
MR-TB (Total) | 28 (1.22) | 5 (2) | 0.564 |
INH | 4 (0.17) | 0 | 0.102 |
RIF | 7 (0.3) | 3 (1.2) | 0.206 |
EMB | 4 (0.17) | 1 (0.4) | 0.180 |
SM | 13 (0.56) | 1 (0.4) | 0.001 |
MDR-TB (Total) | 8 (0.34) | 35 (14.2) | 0.0001 |
MDR1: INH + RIF | 7 (0.3) | 20 (8.1) | 0.011 |
MDR2: INH + RIF +EMB | 0 | 2 (0.81) | 0.317 |
MDR3: INH + RIF + EMB + SM | 1 (0.04) | 12 (4.8) | 0.002 |
MDR4: INH + RIF + SM | 0 | 1 (0.4) | 0.564 |
PDR-TB (Total) | 18 (0.78) | 10 (4.1) | 0.257 |
PDR1: INH + EMB | 2 (0.08) | 0 | 1.000 |
PDR2: INH + SM | 7 (0.3) | 3 (1.2) | 0.564 |
PDR3: RIF + EMB | 0 | 0 | – |
PDR4: RIF + SM | 3 (0.13) | 1 (0.4) | 1.000 |
PDR5: INH + EMB + SM | 2 (0.08) | 4 (1.6) | 0.317 |
Others (SM + EMB) | 4 (0.17) | 2 (0.81) | 0.564 |
RIF – Rifampin, INH – Isoniazid, EMB – Ethambutol, SM – Streptomycin, TB – Tuberculosis,
DR-TB – Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, MR-TB – Mono-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis,
MDR-TB – Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis, PDR-TB – Poly-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis
(INH + EMB + SM), and four other isolates (0.17%) (SM + EMB). There were no PDR3 (RIF + EMB) isolates. The most common type of drug resistance in retreated cases is MDR (14.2%), with the highest resistance rate (8.1%) against INH and RIF, followed by PDR (4.1%) with the highest resistance rate (1.6%) for INH, EMB, and SM, and MR-TB (2%) with the highest resistance rate for RIF (1.2%) (Table II).
The time-based change trend of primary drug resistance rate amongst newly diagnosed TB patients in Basra, Iraq, 2016–2020.
Characteristics | Primary drug resistance rate | Change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*2016 n = 512 | 2017 n = 584 | 2018 n = 490 | 2019 n = 410 | 2020 n = 300 | 204.54 | |
DR-TB (Total) | 1 (0.1) | 13 (2.2) | 5 (1) | 15 (3) | 20 (6.7) | |
Type | ||||||
MR-TB | 0 | 5 (0.85) | 2 (0.4) | 9 (2) | 12 (4) | 370.58 |
MDR-TB | 0 | 1 (0.17) | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.2) | 5 (1.6) | 841.17 |
PDR-TB | 1 (0.1) | 7 (1.19) | 2 (0.4) | 5 (1.2) | 3 (1) | –15.96 |
Age (years) | ||||||
≤ 14 | 0 | 1 (1.6) | 0 | 0 | 1 (3.1) | 93.75 |
15–34 | 1 (0.6) | 4 (1.9) | 2 (1.08) | 6 (4.1) | 8 (7.1) | 273.68 |
35–54 | 0 | 4 (2.58) | 2 (1.45) | 2 (1.63) | 6 (7.14) | 176.74 |
≥ 55 | 0 | 4 (2.54) | 1 (0.85) | 7 (7.2) | 5 (7.04) | 177.16 |
Sex | ||||||
Female | 1 (0.46) | 5 (1.75) | 3 (1.2) | 10 (4.9) | 10 (8.13) | 364.57 |
Male | 0 | 8 (2.67) | 2 (0.8) | 5 (2.4) | 10 (5.64) | 111.23 |
First-line drugs | ||||||
INH | 1 (0.19) | 5 (0.85) | 3 (0.61) | 8 (1.95) | 6 (2) | 1.35 |
RIF | 0 | 1 (0.17) | 2 (0.4) | 3 (0.73) | 12 (4) | 22.5 |
EMB | 0 | 6 (1) | 1 (0.2) | 5 (1.21) | 1 (0.3) | –0.7 |
SM | 1 (0.19) | 11 (1.9) | 2 (0.4) | 5 (1.21) | 11 (3.7) | 18.47 |
* – the column (2016) is not included in the calculation
DR-TB – Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, MR-TB – Mono-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis,
MDR-TB – Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis, PDR-TB – Poly-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis,
EMB – Ethambutol, INH – Isoniazid, RFP – Rifampin, SM – Streptomycin
The time-based change trend of secondary drug resistance rate amongst retreated diagnosed TB cases in Basra, Iraq, 2016–2020.
Characteristics | Secondary drug resistance rate | Change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 n = 81 | 2017 n = 51 | 2018 n = 51 | 2019 n = 41 | 2020 n = 22 | 856.23 | |
DR-TB (Total) | 5 (6.17) | 8 (15.6) | 10 (19.6) | 14 (34.1) | 13 (59) | |
Type | ||||||
MR-TB | 1 (1.2) | 1 (1.9) | 2 (3.9) | 0 | 1 (4.5) | 275 |
MDR-TB | 3 (3.7) | 6 (11.7) | 3 (5.8) | 12 (29.2) | 11 (50) | 1 251.35 |
PDR-TB | 1 (1.2) | 1 (1.9) | 5 (9.8) | 2 (4.8) | 1 (4.5) | 275 |
Age (years) | ||||||
≤ 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15–34 | 2 (8.6) | 3 (30) | 4 (21) | 6 (40) | 4 (44.4) | 416.27 |
35–54 | 1 (4) | 2 (12.5) | 4 (26.6) | 4 (30.7) | 7 (87.5) | 2 087.5 |
≥ 55 | 2 (6.6) | 3 (13) | 2 (11.7) | 4 (30.7) | 2 (40) | 506.06 |
Sex | ||||||
Female | 2 (4.7) | 3 (15.7) | 4 (13.3) | 11 (45.8) | 5 (62.5) | 1129.78 |
Male | 3 (7.6) | 5 (15.6) | 6 (28.5) | 3 (17.6) | 8 (57.1) | 651.31 |
First-line drugs | ||||||
INH | 4 (4.9) | 6 (11.8) | 6 (11.8) | 14 (34) | 12 (54.5) | 10.12 |
RIF | 4 (4.9) | 6 (11.8) | 5 (9.8) | 12 (29.3) | 12 (54.5) | 10.12 |
EMB | 1 (1.2) | 4 (7.8) | 5 (9.8) | 5 (12.2) | 6 (27.3) | 21.75 |
SM | 1 (1.2) | 5 (9.8) | 5 (9.8) | 7 (17) | 6 (27.3) | 21.75 |
DR-TB – Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, MR-TB – Mono-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis,
MDR-TB – Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis, PDR-TB – Poly-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis,
EMB – Ethambutol, INH – Isoniazid, RFP – Rifampin, SM – Streptomycin.
Our study enrolled 2542 cases of newly and retreated TB patients in Basra from 2016 to 2020 to decipher the epidemiology and prevalence of drug resistance in
The present results show that during the study period (five years),
The total population in Basra is estimated to be 2,985,073 as of 2019 (Central Statistical Organization 2019), then the predictable tuberculosis cases would be about 1,284 patients per year. There were 508 identified patients in this study, as the average of the last five years, less than a half of the WHO predicted number. It could be attributed to an inadequate screening procedure or the overestimated case finding the target.
On the other hand, MTB isolates from females presented primary drug resistance with a higher frequency rate than males. There were no such differences in retreated cases. It could be due to cultural reasons when women provide care to in-home patients with DR-TB. It puts women at increased risk for exposure and subsequent DR-TB development. Our results agree with the studies in former Soviet Union countries (Faustini et al. 2006) and Republic of Georgia (Lomtadze et al. 2009), which showed that women are more likely to have MDR-TB than men in new cases of TB. Our findings, however, did not match with the results of the Iranian study, which presented females as more resistant to MDR-TB than males (Jimma et al. 2017).
The present results showed a high frequency of drug resistance among PTB agreed with the study in Papua New Guinea (Diefenbach‐Elstob et al. 2018).
Furthermore, we found that the total MTB drug resistance in urban regions was higher than in rural regions, similar to what was found in India (Almeida et al. 2003). There may be several reasons for these findings, such as those patients in rural settings have fewer admissions to different doctors, and rural areas are less crowded, so there is less transmission of drug resistance TB. The present results revealed that drug resistance was more likely found in retreated cases than in new TB patients. It was almost similar to the results reported in Tanzania (20.6% in retreated vs. 8.3% new cases) (Chonde et al. 2010) and lower than what was found in Sudan (62.8% retreated vs. 30.7% in new TB cases) (Hajissa et al. 2021), India (58.4% retreated vs. 24.9% in new TB cases) (Lohiya et al. 2020), and China (retreated 43.9% vs. 22% in new TB cases) (Yang et al. 2014). Our results also showed that retreated TB patients were significantly more likely to have MDR-TB than patients with primary TB, which may be due to inadequate use of treatment, incomplete treatments, or due lung cavities. These results were almost similar to a study carried out in Ethiopia, which showed the frequency of MDR-TB was 2% in primary cases and 15% in retreated cases (Eshetie et al. 2017), and lower than those obtained by Lomtadze et al. (2009), who found 6.8% vs. 27.4% of MDR-TB in new cases and retreated cases, respectively.
The frequency of MR-TB in the present study was higher in retreated cases than in new cases, which was consistent with another study in the north of Iraq (Merza et al. 2011), but in contrast with the situation in Sudan, where MR-TB was more prevalent in new cases than in retreated ones (Hajissa et al. 2021).
Globally, the occurrence of INH resistance in TB is poorly understood; however, in our study, the frequency of INH resistance was 17.1% in retreated cases and 1% in new cases. It is much less than the global prevalence of INH (27.2%) in retreated, and new cases (10.7%), and less than the Eastern Mediterranean retreated (23.5%) and new cases (10.7%), but almost similar to African retreated cases 13.5% (Dean et al. 2020). The wide variation in the prevalence of INH-resistant TB between different countries could be due to the absence of appropriate diagnostic tools for screening INH resistance, genetic diversity of MTB isolates, or the association of INH resistance with other diseases HIV. However, it requires further studies to be confirmed.
Furthermore, secondary resistance to the three types of MR-TB, MDR-TB, and PDR-TB, was markedly increased in the last five years, especially MDR, which showed a high percentage change (1,251%). The increase in secondary DR-TB was higher than in primary DR-TB, similar to studies carried out in China by Song et al. (2019) and He et al. (2016). It indicates that patients with prior TB infections are more likely to develop resistance.
Regarding the number of primary DR-TB, this parameter increased through the five years (2016–2020) in all age groups. This phenomenon was significantly visible in people 15–34 years old, for whom the percentage change was 274%. The number of secondary DR-TB was also elevated in all age groups, with the most significant increase in patients in age 35–54 years old with a distinct percentage change (2,079%). It is, therefore, also essential to concentrate on patients who are categorized as young and middle-aged. A similar finding was recorded in China (Song et al. 2019).
The number of infected females increased over the years studied more than infected males in primary and secondary DR-TB. According to the first-line drug in primary DR-TB, there was a decrease in EMB over the years by 0.7%, and an increase in INH, RIF, and SM, and RIF had the highest percentage change (22.5%). In secondary DR-TB, resistance to the four drugs has increased over time, so we need more focus on the drug regimen. It was the opposite of what was found in China, as there was a decline in drug resistance to these four drugs (Lan et al. 2019) but similar to those reported by Shamaei et al. (2009), in Iran, who stated that the resistance to the first-line drugs significantly increased.
The present study had defined the time-based trend of DR-TB in Basra province in Iraq from 2016 to 2020. The results showed that the prevalence of TB in Basra from 2016 to 2020 was at an average of 508.4. The most affected age group was young people, a high frequency of TB infection was detected in males, and rural regions. The pulmonary cavity was more associated with retreated cases than new cases. The prevalence of drug resistance in retreated cases was higher than in new TB cases. The highest percentage of resistance was observed against isoniazid among first-line drugs. The temporal trend showed an increasing rate of drug resistance since 2016, especially in the number of MDR-TB patients, and with dominance in female patients. Concerning the primary resistance, the resistance against ethambutol is decreasing. The same trend follows the number of PDR-TB cases. These findings would enhance public responsiveness to TB prevention and control. It is fair to say that they can be deemed necessary in the aim of TB elimination and reduction in Iraq. However, the sample size and geographical sources of clinical samples may not be sufficient to generalize the conclusions to the whole country. More studies are required to investigate a larger sample size from different geographical locations to generalize the outcome information for the entire country.

Fig. 1

The time-based change trend of secondary drug resistance rate amongst retreated diagnosed TB cases in Basra, Iraq, 2016–2020.
Characteristics | Secondary drug resistance rate | Change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 n = 81 | 2017 n = 51 | 2018 n = 51 | 2019 n = 41 | 2020 n = 22 | 856.23 | |
DR-TB (Total) | 5 (6.17) | 8 (15.6) | 10 (19.6) | 14 (34.1) | 13 (59) | |
Type | ||||||
MR-TB | 1 (1.2) | 1 (1.9) | 2 (3.9) | 0 | 1 (4.5) | 275 |
MDR-TB | 3 (3.7) | 6 (11.7) | 3 (5.8) | 12 (29.2) | 11 (50) | 1 251.35 |
PDR-TB | 1 (1.2) | 1 (1.9) | 5 (9.8) | 2 (4.8) | 1 (4.5) | 275 |
Age (years) | ||||||
≤ 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15–34 | 2 (8.6) | 3 (30) | 4 (21) | 6 (40) | 4 (44.4) | 416.27 |
35–54 | 1 (4) | 2 (12.5) | 4 (26.6) | 4 (30.7) | 7 (87.5) | 2 087.5 |
≥ 55 | 2 (6.6) | 3 (13) | 2 (11.7) | 4 (30.7) | 2 (40) | 506.06 |
Sex | ||||||
Female | 2 (4.7) | 3 (15.7) | 4 (13.3) | 11 (45.8) | 5 (62.5) | 1129.78 |
Male | 3 (7.6) | 5 (15.6) | 6 (28.5) | 3 (17.6) | 8 (57.1) | 651.31 |
First-line drugs | ||||||
INH | 4 (4.9) | 6 (11.8) | 6 (11.8) | 14 (34) | 12 (54.5) | 10.12 |
RIF | 4 (4.9) | 6 (11.8) | 5 (9.8) | 12 (29.3) | 12 (54.5) | 10.12 |
EMB | 1 (1.2) | 4 (7.8) | 5 (9.8) | 5 (12.2) | 6 (27.3) | 21.75 |
SM | 1 (1.2) | 5 (9.8) | 5 (9.8) | 7 (17) | 6 (27.3) | 21.75 |
The time-based change trend of primary drug resistance rate amongst newly diagnosed TB patients in Basra, Iraq, 2016–2020.
Characteristics | Primary drug resistance rate | Change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*2016 n = 512 | 2017 n = 584 | 2018 n = 490 | 2019 n = 410 | 2020 n = 300 | 204.54 | |
DR-TB (Total) | 1 (0.1) | 13 (2.2) | 5 (1) | 15 (3) | 20 (6.7) | |
Type | ||||||
MR-TB | 0 | 5 (0.85) | 2 (0.4) | 9 (2) | 12 (4) | 370.58 |
MDR-TB | 0 | 1 (0.17) | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.2) | 5 (1.6) | 841.17 |
PDR-TB | 1 (0.1) | 7 (1.19) | 2 (0.4) | 5 (1.2) | 3 (1) | –15.96 |
Age (years) | ||||||
≤ 14 | 0 | 1 (1.6) | 0 | 0 | 1 (3.1) | 93.75 |
15–34 | 1 (0.6) | 4 (1.9) | 2 (1.08) | 6 (4.1) | 8 (7.1) | 273.68 |
35–54 | 0 | 4 (2.58) | 2 (1.45) | 2 (1.63) | 6 (7.14) | 176.74 |
≥ 55 | 0 | 4 (2.54) | 1 (0.85) | 7 (7.2) | 5 (7.04) | 177.16 |
Sex | ||||||
Female | 1 (0.46) | 5 (1.75) | 3 (1.2) | 10 (4.9) | 10 (8.13) | 364.57 |
Male | 0 | 8 (2.67) | 2 (0.8) | 5 (2.4) | 10 (5.64) | 111.23 |
First-line drugs | ||||||
INH | 1 (0.19) | 5 (0.85) | 3 (0.61) | 8 (1.95) | 6 (2) | 1.35 |
RIF | 0 | 1 (0.17) | 2 (0.4) | 3 (0.73) | 12 (4) | 22.5 |
EMB | 0 | 6 (1) | 1 (0.2) | 5 (1.21) | 1 (0.3) | –0.7 |
SM | 1 (0.19) | 11 (1.9) | 2 (0.4) | 5 (1.21) | 11 (3.7) | 18.47 |
Primary and acquired drug resistance profiles of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, Basra, Iraq 2016–2020.
Drug resistance | New cases n = 2296 (%) | Retreated cases n = 246 (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
DR-TB | 54 (2.4) | 50 (20.3) | 0.0001 |
Any resistance to first-line drugs | |||
INH | 23 (1) | 42(17.1) | 0.0001 |
RIF | 18 (0.78) | 39 (15.8) | 0.0001 |
EMB | 13 (0.56) | 21 (8.5) | 0.011 |
SM | 30 (1.3) | 24 (9.75) | 0.007 |
MR-TB (Total) | 28 (1.22) | 5 (2) | 0.564 |
INH | 4 (0.17) | 0 | 0.102 |
RIF | 7 (0.3) | 3 (1.2) | 0.206 |
EMB | 4 (0.17) | 1 (0.4) | 0.180 |
SM | 13 (0.56) | 1 (0.4) | 0.001 |
MDR-TB (Total) | 8 (0.34) | 35 (14.2) | 0.0001 |
MDR1: INH + RIF | 7 (0.3) | 20 (8.1) | 0.011 |
MDR2: INH + RIF +EMB | 0 | 2 (0.81) | 0.317 |
MDR3: INH + RIF + EMB + SM | 1 (0.04) | 12 (4.8) | 0.002 |
MDR4: INH + RIF + SM | 0 | 1 (0.4) | 0.564 |
PDR-TB (Total) | 18 (0.78) | 10 (4.1) | 0.257 |
PDR1: INH + EMB | 2 (0.08) | 0 | 1.000 |
PDR2: INH + SM | 7 (0.3) | 3 (1.2) | 0.564 |
PDR3: RIF + EMB | 0 | 0 | – |
PDR4: RIF + SM | 3 (0.13) | 1 (0.4) | 1.000 |
PDR5: INH + EMB + SM | 2 (0.08) | 4 (1.6) | 0.317 |
Others (SM + EMB) | 4 (0.17) | 2 (0.81) | 0.564 |
Demographic and clinical characteristics of new and retreated tuberculosis patients, Basra, Iraq, 2016-2020.
New cases | Retreated cases | New cases vs. Retreated cases | Primary DR-TB vs. Acquired DR | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | Total n = 2296 | DR-TB n = 54 (2.4) | Susceptible TB n = 2242 (97.6) | OR (95% CI) | p-value | Total n = 246 | DR-TB n = 50 (20.3) | Susceptible TBn=196 (79.7) | OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
Age | ||||||||||||||
< 14 | 254 | 2 | 252 | 0.233 | 0.051 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.431 | 0.576 | 7.748 | <0.0001 | 3.974 | 0.384 |
(11) | (3.7) | (11.23) | (0.054-1.008) | (2) | (2.6) | (0.023-8.207) | (3.109-19.308) | (0.178-89.003) | ||||||
15-34 | 804 | 21 | 783 | 0.788 | 0.458 | 76 | 19 | 57 | 1.622 | 0.212 | 1.613 | 0.004 | 0.873 | 0.771 |
(35) | (38.9) | (34.9) | (0.420-1.479) | (30.8) | (38) | (29.1) | (0.758-3.470) | (1.166-2.233) | (0.348-2.186) | |||||
35-54 | 661 | 12 | 649 | 0.543 | 0.102 | 77 | 16 | 61 | 1.277 | 0.541 | 1.309 | 0.105 | 0.592 | 0.308 |
(28.7) | (22.2) | (28.9) | (0.261-1.129) | (31.3) | (32) | (31.12) | (0.584-2.791) | (0.945-1.813) | (0.216-1.624) | |||||
>55 | 577 | 19 | 558 | Ref. | Ref. | 88 | 15 | 73 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(25.1) | (35.2) | (24.9) | (35.7) | (30) | (37.2) | |||||||||
Sex | ||||||||||||||
Female | 1076 | 29 | 1047 | 1.324 | 0.310 | 123 | 25 | 98 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.882 | 0.349 | 1.16 | 0.706 |
(46.8) | (53.7) | (46.7) | (0.771-2.275) | (50) | (50) | (50) | (0.537-1.861) | (0.678-1.147) | (0.537-2.506) | |||||
Male | 1220 | 25 | 1195 | Ref. | Ref. | 123 | 25 | 98 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref |
(53.1) | (46.3) | (53.3) | (50) | (50) | (50). | |||||||||
Smoking | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 580 | 13 | 567 | 0.937 | 0.839 | 70 | 15 | 55 | 1.099 | 0.786 | 0.850 | 0.276 | 0.740 | 0.497 |
(25.3) | (24.1) | (25.3) | (0.498-1.761) | (28.4) | (30) | (28.1) | (0.556-2.170) | (0.634-1.139) | (0.310-1.764) | |||||
No | 1716 | 41 | 1675 | Ref. | Ref. | 176 | 35 | 141 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(74.7) | (75.9) | (74.7) | (71.5) | (70) | (71.9) | |||||||||
Cavity | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 710 | 32 | 678 | 1.018 | 0.950 | 153 | 39 | 114 | 0.958 | 0.917 | 0.372 | <0.0001 | 0.391 | 0.038 |
(30.9) | (59.6) | (30.6) | (0.580-1.788) | (62.1) | (78) | (58.2) | (0.428-2.150) | (0.256-0.541) | (0.161-0.948) | |||||
No | 474 | 21 | 453 | Ref. | Ref. | 38 | 1 | 28 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(20.6) | (38.9) | (20.2) | (15.4) | (20) | (14.3) | |||||||||
Infiltration | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 308 | 13 | 295 | 0.921 | 0.801 | 50 | 13 | 37 | 1.025 | 0.948 | 0.992 | 0.962 | 0.9 | 0.817 |
(13.4) | (24.1) | (13.2) | (0.486-1.746) | (20.3) | (26) | (18.9) | (0.490-2.140) | (0.700-1.404) | (0.369-2.194) | |||||
No | 876 | 4 | 836 | Ref. | Ref. | 141 | 36 | 105 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(38.1) | (74.1) | (37.3) | (57.3) | (72) | (53.6) | |||||||||
Other abnormalities | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 142 | 6 | 136 | 0.934 | 0.878 | 23 | 6 | 17 | 1.026 | 0.960 | 0.995 | 0.985 | 0.915 | 0.885 |
(6.1) | (11.1) | (6.04) | (0.392-2.226) | (9.3) | (12) | (8.7) | (0.380-2.770) | (0.622-1.592) | (0.274-3.052) | |||||
No | 1042 | 47 | 995 | Ref. | Ref. | 168 | 43 | 125 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(45.3) | (87) | (44.4) | (68.2) | (86) | (63.8) | |||||||||
Clear | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7.23 | 0.089 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.879 | 0.598 | 1.46 | 0.800 | 2.829 | 0.527 |
(0.17) | (1.9) | (0.13) | (0.739-70.71) | (0.056-147.03) | (0.078-27.227) | (0.113-71.087) | ||||||||
No | 118 | 52 | 1128 | Ref. | Ref. | 191 | 49 | 142 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(51.3) | (96.3) | (50.3) | (77.6) | (98) | (72.4) | |||||||||
Type | ||||||||||||||
Extra | 1112 | 1 | 1111 | Ref. | Ref. | 55 | 1 | 54 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
pulmonary TB | (48.4) | (1.9) | (49.6) | (22.3) | (2) | (27.6) | ||||||||
Pulmonary TB | 118 | 53 | 1131 | 52.062 | 0.0001 | 191 | 49 | 142 | 18.634 | 0.004 | 0.307 | <0.0001 | 1.082 | 0.956 |
(51.5) | (98.1) | (50.4) | (7.19-377.13) | (77.6) | (98) | (72.4) | (2.51-138.31) | (0.225-0.418) | (0.066-17.768) | |||||
Region | ||||||||||||||
Urban | 993 | 32 | 961 | 1.939 | 0.018 | 87 | 27 | 60 | 2.661 | 0.003 | 1.393 | 0.018 | 1.239 | 0.589 |
(43.2) | (59.3) | (42.9) | (1.12-3.358) | (35.3) | (54) | (30.6) | (1.412-5.015) | (1.059-1.832) | (0.570-2.965) | |||||
Rural | 1303 | 2 | 1281 | Ref. | Ref. | 159 | 23 | 136 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
(56.7) | (40.7) | (57.1) | (64.6) | (46) | (69.4) |
The Pathogen Isolates in Chronic Wound Infections in Poland Isolation and Characterization of Potential Lignin Peroxidase-Producing Bacteria from Compost Samples at Richards Bay (South Africa) Antimicrobial Resistance and Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Febrile Cases: Findings from a Rural Cohort of Odisha, IndiaInteraction of Biochemical Processes between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Molecular Epidemiology of Bulgarian Clinically Significant Staphylococcus aureus IsolatesCharacterization of Serotypes and Molecular Drug Resistance Patterns of Haemophilus influenzae in Kunming Children