This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abdullah JJ, Greetham D, Pensupa N, Tucker GA, Du C. Optimizing cellulase production from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) using Solid State Fermentation (SSF). J Fundam Renew Energy Appl. 2016;6(3). https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-4541.1000206AbdullahJJGreethamDPensupaNTuckerGADuC.Optimizing cellulase production from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) using Solid State Fermentation (SSF). J Fundam Renew Energy Appl.2016;6(3). https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-4541.100020610.4172/2090-4541.1000206Search in Google Scholar
Baffert C, Kpebe A, Avilan L, Brugna M. Chapter Three – Hydrogenases and H2 metabolism in sulfate-reducing bacteria of the Desulfovibrio genus. In: Poole RK, editor. Advances in Microbial Physiology. Vol. 74. Cambridge (USA): Academic Press; 2019. p. 143–189.BaffertCKpebeAAvilanLBrugnaM.Chapter Three – Hydrogenases and H2 metabolism in sulfate-reducing bacteria of the Desulfovibrio genus. In: PooleRK, editor. Advances in Microbial Physiology. Vol. 74. Cambridge (USA): Academic Press; 2019. p. 143–189.10.1016/bs.ampbs.2019.03.00131126530Search in Google Scholar
Baghchehsaraee B, Nakhla G, Karamanev D, Margaritis A, Reid G. The effect of heat pretreatment temperature on fermentative hydrogen production using mixed cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008 Aug;33(15):4064–4073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.069BaghchehsaraeeBNakhlaGKaramanevDMargaritisAReidG.The effect of heat pretreatment temperature on fermentative hydrogen production using mixed cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2008Aug;33(15):4064–4073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.06910.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.069Search in Google Scholar
Bao H, Chen C, Jiang L, Liu Y, Shen M, Liu W, Wang A. Optimization of key factors affecting biohydrogen production from microcrystalline cellulose by the co-culture of Clostridium acetobutylicum X9 + Ethanoigenens harbinense B2. RSC Advances. 2016; 6(5):3421–3427. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA14192CBaoHChenCJiangLLiuYShenMLiuWWangA.Optimization of key factors affecting biohydrogen production from microcrystalline cellulose by the co-culture of Clostridium acetobutylicum X9 + Ethanoigenens harbinense B2. RSC Advances.2016; 6(5):3421–3427. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA14192C10.1039/C5RA14192CSearch in Google Scholar
Bernardez LA, de Andrade Lima LRP. Improved method for enumerating sulfate-reducing bacteria using optical density. MethodsX. 2015;2 Supplement C:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2015.04.006BernardezLAde Andrade LimaLRP.Improved method for enumerating sulfate-reducing bacteria using optical density. MethodsX.2015;2Supplement C:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2015.04.00610.1016/j.mex.2015.04.006448791926150995Search in Google Scholar
Bundhoo MAZ, Mohee R, Hassan MA. Effects of pre-treatment technologies on dark fermentative biohydrogen production: A review. J Environ Manage. 2015 Jul;157:20–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.006BundhooMAZMoheeRHassanMA.Effects of pre-treatment technologies on dark fermentative biohydrogen production: A review. J Environ Manage.2015Jul;157:20–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.00610.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.00625881150Search in Google Scholar
Cai J, Wang G. Comparison of different pre-treatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from intertidal sludge. Int J Green Energy. 2016 Feb 19;13(3):292–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.893436CaiJWangG.Comparison of different pre-treatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from intertidal sludge. Int J Green Energy.2016Feb 19;13(3):292–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.89343610.1080/15435075.2014.893436Search in Google Scholar
Carver SM, Nelson MC, Lepistö R, Yu Z, Tuovinen OH. Hydrogen and volatile fatty acid production during fermentation of cellulosic substrates by a thermophilic consortium at 50 and 60°C. Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jan;104:424–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.013CarverSMNelsonMCLepistöRYuZTuovinenOH.Hydrogen and volatile fatty acid production during fermentation of cellulosic substrates by a thermophilic consortium at 50 and 60°C. Bioresour Technol.2012Jan;104:424–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.01310.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.01322133607Search in Google Scholar
Deng C, Lin R, Cheng J, Murphy JD. Can acid pre-treatment enhance biohydrogen and biomethane production from grass silage in single-stage and two-stage fermentation processes? Energy Convers Manag. 2019 Sep;195:738–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.044DengCLinRChengJMurphyJD.Can acid pre-treatment enhance biohydrogen and biomethane production from grass silage in single-stage and two-stage fermentation processes?Energy Convers Manag.2019Sep;195:738–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.04410.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.044Search in Google Scholar
Dinesh GK, Chauhan R, Chakma S. Influence and strategies for enhanced biohydrogen production from food waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018 Sep;92:807–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.009DineshGKChauhanRChakmaS.Influence and strategies for enhanced biohydrogen production from food waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev.2018Sep;92:807–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.00910.1016/j.rser.2018.05.009Search in Google Scholar
Gadow SI, Li YY, Liu Y. Effect of temperature on continuous hydrogen production of cellulose. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012 Oct; 37(20):15465–15472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.128GadowSILiYYLiuY.Effect of temperature on continuous hydrogen production of cellulose. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2012Oct; 37(20):15465–15472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.12810.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.128Search in Google Scholar
Gomez-Flores M, Nakhla G, Hafez H. Hydrogen production and microbial kinetics of Clostridium termitidis in mono-culture and co-culture with Clostridium beijerinckii on cellulose. AMB Express. 2017 Dec;7(1):84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0256-2Gomez-FloresMNakhlaGHafezH.Hydrogen production and microbial kinetics of Clostridium termitidis in mono-culture and co-culture with Clostridium beijerinckii on cellulose. AMB Express.2017Dec;7(1):84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0256-210.1186/s13568-016-0256-2539901528429329Search in Google Scholar
Gupta M, Velayutham P, Elbeshbishy E, Hafez H, Khafipour E, Derakhshani H, El Naggar MH, Levin DB, Nakhla G. Co-fermentation of glucose, starch, and cellulose for mesophilic biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014 Dec;39(36):20958–20967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.079GuptaMVelayuthamPElbeshbishyEHafezHKhafipourEDerakhshaniHEl NaggarMHLevinDBNakhlaG.Co-fermentation of glucose, starch, and cellulose for mesophilic biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2014Dec;39(36):20958–20967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.07910.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.079Search in Google Scholar
Ho KL, Lee DJ, Su A, Chang JS. Biohydrogen from lignocellulosic feedstock via one-step process. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012 Oct;37 (20):15569–15574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.137HoKLLeeDJSuAChangJS.Biohydrogen from lignocellulosic feedstock via one-step process. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2012Oct;37 (20):15569–15574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.13710.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.137Search in Google Scholar
Jiang H, Gadow SI, Tanaka Y, Cheng J, Li YY. Improved cellulose conversion to bio-hydrogen with thermophilic bacteria and characterization of microbial community in continuous bioreactor. Biomass Bioenergy. 2015 Apr;75:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.02.010JiangHGadowSITanakaYChengJLiYY.Improved cellulose conversion to bio-hydrogen with thermophilic bacteria and characterization of microbial community in continuous bioreactor. Biomass Bioenergy.2015Apr;75:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.02.01010.1016/j.biombioe.2015.02.010Search in Google Scholar
Kumar G, Bakonyi P, Periyasamy S, Kim SH, Nemestóthy N, Bélafi-Bakó K. Lignocellulose biohydrogen: practical challenges and recent progress. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015 Apr;44 Supplement C:728–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.042KumarGBakonyiPPeriyasamySKimSHNemestóthyNBélafi-BakóK.Lignocellulose biohydrogen: practical challenges and recent progress. Renew Sustain Energy Rev.2015Apr;44 Supplement C:728–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.04210.1016/j.rser.2015.01.042Search in Google Scholar
Lin C, Chang C, Hung C. Fermentative hydrogen production from starch using natural mixed cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008 May;33(10):2445–2453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.069LinCChangCHungC.Fermentative hydrogen production from starch using natural mixed cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2008May;33(10):2445–2453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.06910.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.069Search in Google Scholar
Lo YC, Huang CY, Fu TN, Chen CY, Chang JS. Fermentative hydrogen production from hydrolyzed cellulosic feedstock prepared with a thermophilic anaerobic bacterial isolate. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009 Aug;34(15):6189–6200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.104LoYCHuangCYFuTNChenCYChangJS.Fermentative hydrogen production from hydrolyzed cellulosic feedstock prepared with a thermophilic anaerobic bacterial isolate. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2009Aug;34(15):6189–6200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.10410.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.104Search in Google Scholar
Łukajtis R, Hołowacz I, Kucharska K, Glinka M, Rybarczyk P, Przyjazny A, Kamiński M. Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018 Aug;91: 665–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.043ŁukajtisRHołowaczIKucharskaKGlinkaMRybarczykPPrzyjaznyAKamińskiM.Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev.2018Aug;91: 665–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.04310.1016/j.rser.2018.04.043Search in Google Scholar
Mockaitis G, Bruant G, Guiot SR, Peixoto G, Foresti E, Zaiat M. Acidic and thermal pre-treatments for anaerobic digestion inoculum to improve hydrogen and volatile fatty acid production using xylose as the substrate. Renew Energy. 2020 Jan;145:1388–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.134MockaitisGBruantGGuiotSRPeixotoGForestiEZaiatM.Acidic and thermal pre-treatments for anaerobic digestion inoculum to improve hydrogen and volatile fatty acid production using xylose as the substrate. Renew Energy.2020Jan;145:1388–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.13410.1016/j.renene.2019.06.134Search in Google Scholar
Mohammed A, Abdul-Wahab MF, Hashim M, Omar AH, Md Reba MN, Muhamad Said MF, Soeed K, Alias SA, Smykla J, Abba M, et al. Biohydrogen production by antarctic psychrotolerant Klebsiella sp. ABZ11. Pol J Microbiol. 2018;67(3):283–290. https://doi.org/10.21307/pjm-2018-033MohammedAAbdul-WahabMFHashimMOmarAHMd RebaMNMuhamad SaidMFSoeedKAliasSASmyklaJAbbaM, Biohydrogen production by antarctic psychrotolerant Klebsiella sp. ABZ11. Pol J Microbiol.2018;67(3):283–290. https://doi.org/10.21307/pjm-2018-03310.21307/pjm-2018-033725569030451444Search in Google Scholar
Nagarajan D, Lee DJ, Chang JS. Recent insights into consolidated bioprocessing for lignocellulosic biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019 May;44(28):14362–14379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.066NagarajanDLeeDJChangJS.Recent insights into consolidated bioprocessing for lignocellulosic biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2019May;44(28):14362–14379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.06610.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.066Search in Google Scholar
Plugge CM, Zhang W, Scholten JCM, Stams AJM. Metabolic flexibility of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:81. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00081PluggeCMZhangWScholtenJCMStamsAJM.Metabolic flexibility of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Front Microbiol.2011;2:81. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.0008110.3389/fmicb.2011.00081311940921734907Search in Google Scholar
Ravindran A, Adav S, Yang SS. Effect of heat pre-treatment temperature on isolation of hydrogen producing functional consortium from soil. Renew Energy. 2010 Dec;35(12):2649–2655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.04.010RavindranAAdavSYangSS.Effect of heat pre-treatment temperature on isolation of hydrogen producing functional consortium from soil. Renew Energy.2010Dec;35(12):2649–2655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.04.01010.1016/j.renene.2010.04.010Search in Google Scholar
Ren NQ, Xu JF, Gao LF, Xin L, Qiu J, Su DX. Fermentative biohydrogen production from cellulose by cow dung compost enriched cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010 Apr;35(7):2742–2746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.04.057RenNQXuJFGaoLFXinLQiuJSuDX.Fermentative biohydrogen production from cellulose by cow dung compost enriched cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2010Apr;35(7):2742–2746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.04.05710.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.04.057Search in Google Scholar
Saady NMC. Homoacetogenesis during hydrogen production by mixed cultures dark fermentation: unresolved challenge. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2013 Oct;38(30):13172–13191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.122SaadyNMC.Homoacetogenesis during hydrogen production by mixed cultures dark fermentation: unresolved challenge. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2013Oct;38(30):13172–13191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.12210.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.122Search in Google Scholar
Saripan AF, Reungsang A. Thermophilic fermentative biohydrogen production from xylan by anaerobic mixed cultures in elephant dung. Int J Green Energy. 2015 Sep 02;12(9):900–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.887567SaripanAFReungsangA.Thermophilic fermentative biohydrogen production from xylan by anaerobic mixed cultures in elephant dung. Int J Green Energy.2015Sep 02;12(9):900–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2014.88756710.1080/15435075.2014.887567Search in Google Scholar
Sgobbi A, Nijs W, De Miglio R, Chiodi A, Gargiulo M, Thiel C. How far away is hydrogen? Its role in the medium and long-term decarbonisation of the European energy system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016 Jan;41(1):19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.004SgobbiANijsWDe MiglioRChiodiAGargiuloMThielC.How far away is hydrogen? Its role in the medium and long-term decarbonisation of the European energy system. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2016Jan;41(1):19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.00410.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.004Search in Google Scholar
Shanmugam SR, Lalman JA, Chaganti SR, Heath DD, Lau PCK, Shewa WA. Long term impact of stressing agents on fermentative hydrogen production: effect on the hydrogenase flux and population diversity. Renew Energy. 2016 Apr;88:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.062ShanmugamSRLalmanJAChagantiSRHeathDDLauPCKShewaWA.Long term impact of stressing agents on fermentative hydrogen production: effect on the hydrogenase flux and population diversity. Renew Energy.2016Apr;88:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.06210.1016/j.renene.2015.11.062Search in Google Scholar
Trchounian K, Sawers RG, Trchounian A. Improving biohydrogen productivity by microbial dark- and photo-fermentations: novel data and future approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017 Dec; 80:1201–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.149TrchounianKSawersRGTrchounianA.Improving biohydrogen productivity by microbial dark- and photo-fermentations: novel data and future approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev.2017Dec; 80:1201–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.14910.1016/j.rser.2017.05.149Search in Google Scholar
Wang J, Yin Y. Fermentative hydrogen production using various biomass-based materials as feedstock. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018 Sep;92:284–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.033WangJYinY.Fermentative hydrogen production using various biomass-based materials as feedstock. Renew Sustain Energy Rev.2018Sep;92:284–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.03310.1016/j.rser.2018.04.033Search in Google Scholar
Wang J, Yin Y. Principle and application of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from mixed cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017 Feb;42(8):4804–4823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.135WangJYinY.Principle and application of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from mixed cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2017Feb;42(8):4804–4823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.13510.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.135Search in Google Scholar
Wang YY, Ai P, Hu CX, Zhang YL. Effects of various pretreatment methods of anaerobic mixed microflora on biohydrogen production and the fermentation pathway of glucose. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011 Jan;36(1):390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.092WangYYAiPHuCXZhangYL.Effects of various pretreatment methods of anaerobic mixed microflora on biohydrogen production and the fermentation pathway of glucose. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2011Jan;36(1):390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.09210.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.092Search in Google Scholar
Yang G, Wang J, Shen Y. Antibiotic fermentation residue for biohydrogen production using different pretreated cultures: performance evaluation and microbial community analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2019 Nov;292:122012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122012YangGWangJShenY.Antibiotic fermentation residue for biohydrogen production using different pretreated cultures: performance evaluation and microbial community analysis. Bioresour Technol.2019Nov;292:122012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.12201210.1016/j.biortech.2019.12201231442834Search in Google Scholar
Zagrodnik R, Łaniecki M. The effect of pH on cooperation between dark- and photo-fermentative bacteria in a co-culture process for hydrogen production from starch. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017 Feb;42(5):2878–2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.150ZagrodnikRŁanieckiM.The effect of pH on cooperation between dark- and photo-fermentative bacteria in a co-culture process for hydrogen production from starch. Int J Hydrogen Energy.2017Feb;42(5):2878–2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.15010.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.150Search in Google Scholar
Zhang JN, Li YH, Zheng HQ, Fan YT, Hou HW. Direct degradation of cellulosic biomass to bio-hydrogen from a newly isolated strain Clostridium sartagoforme FZ11. Bioresour Technol. 2015 Sep;192:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.034ZhangJNLiYHZhengHQFanYTHouHW.Direct degradation of cellulosic biomass to bio-hydrogen from a newly isolated strain Clostridium sartagoforme FZ11. Bioresour Technol.2015Sep;192:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.03410.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.03426011692Search in Google Scholar
Zhang L, Li Y, Liu X, Ren N, Ding J. Lignocellulosic hydrogen production using dark fermentation by Clostridium lentocellum strain Cel10 newly isolated from Ailuropoda melanoleuca excrement. RSC Advances. 2019 Apr 09;9(20):11179–11185. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA01158GZhangLLiYLiuXRenNDingJ.Lignocellulosic hydrogen production using dark fermentation by Clostridium lentocellum strain Cel10 newly isolated from Ailuropoda melanoleuca excrement. RSC Advances.2019Apr 09;9(20):11179–11185. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA01158G10.1039/C9RA01158GSearch in Google Scholar