[
Adner, R., Kapoor, R., 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. DOI: 10.1002/smj.821
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Afuah, A., Tucci, C.L., 2012. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2010.0146
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Audretsch, B. D., Belitski, M., 2023. The limits to open innovation and its impact on innovation performance. Technovation, 119, 102519. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102519
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bacon, E. C., Williams, M. D., 2022. Deconstructing the ivory tower: identifying challenges of university-industry ecosystem partnerships. Review of Managerial Science, 16(1), 113–134. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-020-00436-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baldwin, C. Y., Woodard, C. J., 2009. The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Platforms, markets and innovation, 32, 19–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barbosa, A.P.F.P.L., Salerno,M.S., Nascimento,P.T.deS., Albala,A., Maranzato,F.P., Tamoschus,D., 2021. Configurations of project management practices to enhance the performance of open innovation R&D projects.InternationalJournal of Project Management, 39(2), 128–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T.-M., Conradsen, M. L., Di Marco, D., Distel, A. P., Dobusch, L., Dörler, D., Effert, A., 2022. The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 136–185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., Hess, T., 2015. How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 209–228. DOI: 10.1057/jit.2015.6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bertello, A., De Bernardi, P., Ricciardi, F., 2023. Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field. Review of Managerial Science. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-023-00655-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S., Galati, F., 2020. The past, present and future of open innovation. In European Journal of Innovation Management. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0296
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bogers, M., Afuah, A., Bastian, B., 2010. Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857–875. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309353944
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bogers, M., Foss, N.J., Lyngsie, J., 2018. The “Human” Side of Open Innovation: The Role of Employee Diversity in Firm-Level Open Innovation Capabilities. Journal of World Business, 53(5), 741–758.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S., Hagedoorn, J., Hilgers, D., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M. G., Majchrzak, A., McCarthy, I. P., Moeslein, K. M., Nambisan, S., Piller, F. T., … Ter Wal, A. L. J., 2017. The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40. DOI: 10.1080/13662716. 2016.1240068
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boudreau, K., 2010. Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brabham, D.C., 2013. Using crowd sourcing in government., IBM Center for the Business of Government. Washington
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradonjic, P., Franke, N., Lüthje, C., 2019. Decision-makers’ underestimation of user innovation. Research Policy, 48(6), 1354–1361. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brunswicker, S., Vanhaverbeke, W., 2015. Open Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1241–1263. DOI: 10.1111/jsbm.12120
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cabrilo, S., Dahms, S., Mutuc, E., Marlin, J., 2020. The role of IT practices in facilitating relational and trust capital for superior innovation performance: the case of Taiwanese companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(5), 753–779. DOI: 10.1108/jic-07-2019-0182
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cenamor, J., Frishammar, J., 2021. Openness in platform ecosystems: Innovation strategies for complementary products. Research Policy, 50, 104148.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chesbrough, H., 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chesbrough, H., Bogers, M., 2014. Explicating Open Innovation. In New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 3–28, Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chesbrough, H., Crowther, A. K., 2006. Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R and D Management, 36(3), 229–236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J., 2014. New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christensen, I., Karlsson, C., 2019. Open innovation and the effects of Crowd sourcing in a pharma ecosystem. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 240–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coad, A., Nightingale, P., Stilgoe, J., Vezzani, A., 2021. Editorial: the dark side of innovation. Industry and Innovation, 28(1), 102–112. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2020.1818555
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cui, T., Ye, J. H., Tan, C. H., 2022. Information technology in open innovation: A resource orchestration perspective. Information & Management, 59(8), 103699. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2022.103699
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’Este, P., Guy, F., Iammarino, S., 2013. Shaping the formation of university–industry research collaborations: what type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 537–558. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbs010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dahlander, L., Gann, D. M., Wallin, M. W., 2021. How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward. Research Policy, 50(4), 104218.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dodgson, M., 2020. The Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Estellés-Arolas, E., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F., 2012. Towards an integrated crowd sourcing definition. Journal of Information Science, 38(2), 189–200. DOI: 10.1177/0165551512437638
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fiss, P. C., 2011. Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gawer, A., Cusumano, M. A., 2014. Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gligor, D., Gölgeci, İ., Rêgo, C., Russo, I., Bozkurt, S., Pohlen, T., … & Garg, V., 2021. Examining the use of fsqca in b2b marketing research: benefits, current state and agenda for future research. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 37(7), 1542–1552. DOI: 10.1108/jbim-09-2020-0436
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L., 2016. An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance. European Management Journal, 34(5), 501–516. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hagedoorn, J., Zobel, A.-K., 2015. The role of contracts and intellectual property rights in open innovation. TechnologyAnalysis&Strategic Management, 27(9) DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2015.1056134
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hilgers, D., Ihl, C., 2010. Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holgersson, M., Baldwin, C. Y., Chesbrough, H., Bogers, M. L. A. M., 2022. The forces of ecosystem evolution. California Management Review, 64(3), 5–23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hossain, M., Kauranen, I., 2016. Open innovation in SMEs: a systematic literature review. Journal of Strategy and Management, 9(1), 58–73. DOI: 10.1108/JSMA-08-2014-0072
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howells, J., Ramlogan, R., Cheng, S., 2012. Universities in an open innovation system: a UK perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(4), 440–456. DOI: 10.1108/13552551211239483
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huber, F., Wainwright, T., Rentocchini, F., 2020. Open data for open innovation: managing absorptive capacity in SMEs. R&D Management, 50(1), 31–46. DOI: 10.1111/radm.12347
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Isckia, T., De Reuver, M., Lescop, D., 2020. Orchestrating platform ecosystems: the interplay of innovation and business development subsystems. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 197–223.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kumar, S., Sahoo, S., Lim, W.M., Kraus, S., Bamel, U., 2022. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview. Technological Forecasting and Social-Change, 178, 121599. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121599
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kusa, R., Duda, J., Suder, M., 2021. Explaining SME performance with fsQCA: The role of entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneur motivation, and opportunity perception. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lauritzen, G.D., Karafyllia, M., 2018. Perspective: Leveraging Open Innovation through Paradox. Journal of Product Innovation Management.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laursen, K., Salter, A., 2006. Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among UK Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laursen, K., Salter, A., 2014. Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among UK Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 707–721.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laursen, K., Salter, A., Somaya, D., 2022. Complementarities and tensions between appropriability and open innovation: An overview of prior research and future opportunities. In Handbook of Ope Innovation Oxford University Press (OUP.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Y., Fong, E., Barney, J. B., Hawk, A., 2019. Why do experts solve complex problems using open innovation? Evidence from the US pharmaceutical industry. California Management Review, 62(1), 144–166.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lichtenthaler, U., 2010. Intellectual property and open innovation: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3/4), 372–391. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2010.035981
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., 2020. What Is Crowd sourcing for Innovation? BT - Unleashing the Crowd: Collaborative Solutions to Wicked Business and Societal Problems (A. Majchrzak & A. Malhotra (eds.); 3–46, Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25557-2_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Majchrzak, A., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Chesbrough, H., Holgersson, M., 2023. Creating and Capturing Value from Open Innovation: Humans, Firms, Platforms, and Ecosystems. California Management Review, 65(2)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marzi, G., Fakhar Manesh, M., Caputo, A., Pellegrini, M.M., Vlačić, B., 2023. Do or do not. Cognitive configurations affecting open innovation adoption inSMEs. Technovation, 119, 102585. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102585
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mignon, S., Ayerbe, C., Dubouloz, S., Robert, M. & West, J., 2020. Managerial Innovation and Management of Open Innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 32, 3–12. DOI: 10.3917/jie.032.0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milagres, R., Burcharth, A., 2019. Knowledge transfer in interorganizational partnerships: what do we know? Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 27–68. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0175
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen, T. P. T., Huang, F., Tian, X., 2023. Intellectual property protection need as a driver for open innovation: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Technovation, 123, 102714. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102714
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ogink, R. H. A. J., Goossen, M. C., Romme, A. G. L., Akkermans, H., 2023. Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Technovation, 119, 102621. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102621
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olk, P., West, J., 2020. The relationship of industry structure to open innovation: cooperative value creation in pharmaceutical consortia. R&D Management, 50(1),116–135.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ooms, W., Piepenbrink, R., 2021. Open innovation for wicked problems: Using proximity to overcome barriers. California Management Review, 63(2), 62–100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oyemomi, O., Liu, S., Neaga, I., Chen, H., Nakpodia, F., 2019. How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: using the fsqca approach. Journal of Business Research, 94, 313–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parida, V., Westerberg, M., Frishammar, J., 2012. Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High-Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 283–309.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., Sobrero, M., 2013. Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piezunka, H., Dahlander, L., 2014. Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations’ Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 856–880. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2012.0458
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piller, F., West, J., 2014. Firms, users, and innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 29(1), 29–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollok, P., Lüttgens, D., Piller, F. T., 2019. How Firms Develop Capabilities for Crowdsourcing to Increase Open Innovation Performance: The Interplay between Organizational Roles and Knowledge Processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(4), 412–441. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12485
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pundziene, A., Sermontyte-Baniule, R., Rialp-Criado, J., Chesbrough, H., 2023. Indirect effect of open innovation on clinical and economic value creation in digital healthcare: A comparative study of European countries. Journal of Business Research, 159, 113701. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113701
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radziwon, A., Bogers, M., 2019. Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter–organizational relationships in an ecosystem. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 573–587. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radziwon, A., Chesbrough, H., West, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., 2023. The Future of Open Innovation. In Chesbrough, H., Radziwon, A., Vanhaverbeke, W. & West, J. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Open Innovation. Oxford University Press. Chapter 57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ragin,C.C., 2014. The comparative method:Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rauter, R., Globocnik, D., Perl–Vorbach, E., Baumgartner, R. J., 2019. Open innovationand its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance. Journalo Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 226–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ritala, P., Almpanopoulou, A., 2017. In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 60, 39–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robaczewska, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., Lorenz, A., 2019. Applying open innovation strategies in the context of a regional innovation ecosystem: The case of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Global Transitions, 1, 120–131.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rasoolimanesh, S., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Olya, H., 2021. The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1571–1592. DOI: 10.1108/ijchm-10-2020-1164
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sadiq, S., Indulska, M., 2017. Open data: Quality over quantity. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 150–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saridakis, C., Zaefarian, G., Ganotakis, P., Angelidou, S., 2022. A step-by-step guide of (fuzzy set) qualitative comparative analysis: From theory to practice via an implementation in a B2B context. Industrial Marketing-Management, 107, 92–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.09.026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A., 2011. Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation, 431–446, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, C. Q., Wagemann, C. (2012. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scuotto, V., Beatrice, O., Valentina, C., Nicotra, M., Di Gioia, L., Farina Briamonte, M., 2020. Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119906. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119906
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sedita, S. R., Grandinetti, R., 2023. Beyond R&D: a configurational approach to open innovation in the Veneto region. European Planning Studies, 31(5), 1050–1069. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2114316
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seidel, V. P., Langner, B., Sims, J., 2016. Dominant communities and dominant designs: Community-based innovation in the context of the technology life cycle. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 220–241. DOI: 10.1177/1476127016653726
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Gilbert, B. A., 2011. Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 0–1412. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310385695
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stefan, I., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Vanhaverbeke, W., Oikarinen, E.-L., 2022. The dark side of open innovation: Individual affective responses as hidden tolls of the paradox of openness. Journal of Business Research, 138, 360–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steinmo, M., Rasmussen, E., 2018).The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier. Research Policy, 47(10), 1964–1974. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., Dedehayir, O., 2019. A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335–360.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, S., Liao, S., Wang, L., Chen, W., Guo, Z., 2022. A configurational analysis of small and medium-sized enterprises’ radical innovations: the perspective of dynamic capabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784738
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teece, D. J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research policy, 15(6), 285–305.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Von Hippel, E., 2009. Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 1(1), 29–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, J., Bogers, M., 2014. Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: Are-view of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12125
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, J., Lakhani, K. R., 2008. Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 223–231. DOI: 10.1080/13662710802033734
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, J., Olk, P., 2023. Distributed Governance of a Complex Ecosystem: How R&D Consortia Orchestrate the Alzheimer’s Knowledge Ecosystem. California Management Review, 65(2), 93–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xie, X., Wu, Y., Martínez, J. M. G., 2023. More is not always better: Reconciling the dilemma of R&D collaboration in high-tech industries in transition economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122422. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122422
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., 2014. Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 17–29. DOI: DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
, 