Open Access

Correlation Between Printing Parameters and Residual Stress in Additive Manufacturing: A Numerical Simulation Approach


Cite

Abdulhameed, O., Al-Ahmari, A., Ameen, W., Mian, S. H., 2019. Additive manufacturing: Challenges, trends, and applications. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(2), 168781401882288. DOI: 10.1177/1687814018822880Search in Google Scholar

Ahangar, P., Cooke, M. E., Weber, M. H., Rosenzweig, D. H., 2019. Current Biomedical Applications of 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing. Applied Sciences, 9(8), 1713. DOI: 10.3390/app9081713Search in Google Scholar

Alsardia, T., Lovas, -László, Ficzere, -Péter., 2021. Prototype For Fit Investigations. Design of Machines and Structures, 11(1), 5–15. DOI: 10.32972/dms.2021.001Search in Google Scholar

Alzyod, H., Ficzere, P., 2021a. Potential Applications Of Additive Manufacturing Technologies In The Vehicle Industry. Design of Machines and Structures, 11(2), 5–13.Search in Google Scholar

Alzyod, H., Ficzere, P., 2021b. Using Finite Element Analysis in the 3D Printing of Metals. Hungarian Journal of Industry and Chemistry, 49(2), 65–70. DOI: 10.33927/hjic-2021-24Search in Google Scholar

Alzyod, H., Ficzere, P., 2022. The Influence of the Layer Orientation on Ultimate Tensile Strength of 3D Printed Poly-lactic Acid. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 16(3), 361–367.Search in Google Scholar

Baich, L., Manogharan, G., Marie, H., 2015. Study of infill print design on production cost-time of 3D printed ABS parts. International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing, 5(3–4), 308–319. DOI: 10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2015.074809Search in Google Scholar

Bertevas, E., Férec, J., Khoo, B. C., Ausias, G., Phan-Thien, N., 2018. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) modeling of fiber orientation in a 3D printing process. Physics of Fluids, 30(10), 103103. DOI: 10.1063/1.5047088Search in Google Scholar

Blakey-Milner, B., Gradl, P., Snedden, G., Brooks, M., Pitot, J., Lopez, E., Leary, M., Berto, F., du Plessis, A., 2021. Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review. Materials Design, 209, 110008. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008Search in Google Scholar

Casavola, C., Cazzato, A., Moramarco, V., Pappalettera, G., 2017. Residual stress measurement in Fused Deposition Modelling parts. Polymer Testing, 58, 249–255. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Cattenone, A., Morganti, S., Alaimo, G., Auricchio, F., 2019. Finite Element Analysis of Additive Manufacturing Based on Fused Deposition Modeling: Distortions Prediction and Comparison With Experimental Data. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 141(1). DOI: 10.1115/1.4041626Search in Google Scholar

Chen, R., He, W., Xie, H., Liu, S., 2021. Monitoring the strain and stress in FDM printed lamellae by using Fiber Bragg Grating sensors. Polymer Testing, 93, 106944. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106944 Search in Google Scholar

Costa, S. F., Duarte, F. M., Covas, J. A., 2015. Thermal conditions affecting heat transfer in FDM/FFE: a contribution towards the numerical modelling of the process. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 10(1), 35–46. DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2014.984042Search in Google Scholar

Cuan-Urquizo, E., Barocio, E., Tejada-Ortigoza, V., Pipes, R., Rodriguez, C., Roman-Flores, A., 2019. Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of FFF Structures and Materials: A Review on the Experimental, Computational and Theoretical Approaches. Materials, 12(6), 895. DOI: 10.3390/ma12060895Search in Google Scholar

Dasgupta, A., Dutta, P., 2022. A Comprehensive Review on 3D Printing Technology: Current Applications and Challenges. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 16(4), 529–542.Search in Google Scholar

Deng, X., Zeng, Z., Peng, B., Yan, S., Ke, W., 2018. Mechanical Properties Optimization of Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone via Fused Deposition Modeling. Materials 2018, Vol. 11, Page 216, 11(2), 216. DOI: 10.3390/MA11020216Search in Google Scholar

Fatimatuzahraa, A. W., Farahaina, B., Yusoff, W. A. Y., 2011. The effect of employing different raster orientations on the mechanical properties and microstructure of Fused Deposition Modeling parts. 2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA), 22–27. DOI: 10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088811Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, R. T. L., Quelho de Macedo, R., 2017. Residual thermal stress in fused deposition modelling. Procceedings of the 24th ABCM International Congress of Mechanicl Engineering. DOI: 10.26678/ABCM.COBEM2017.COB17-0124Search in Google Scholar

Ficzere, P., 2022. The Impact of the Positioning of Parts on the Variable Production Costs in the Case of Additive Manufacturing. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 50(3), 304–308. DOI: 10.3311/PPtr.15827Search in Google Scholar

Ficzere, P., Borbas, L., Szebenyi, G., 2017. Reduction possibility of residual stresses from additive manufacturing by photostress method. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(5), 5797–5802. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.048Search in Google Scholar

Fodran, E., Koch, M., Menon, U., 1996. Mechanical and dimensional characteristics of fused deposition modeling build styles. In 1996 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., 2015. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer New York. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3Search in Google Scholar

Hadny, A., Ayun, Q., Triyono, J., Pujiyanto, E., 2022. Optimization of Injection Molding Simulation of Bioabsorbable Bone Screw Using Taguchi Method and Particle Swarm Optimization. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 16(2), 319–325.Search in Google Scholar

Horváth, Á. M., Ficzere, P., 2015. Rapid prototyping in medical sciences. Production Engineering Archives, 8, 28–31. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2015.08.07Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, B., Fouladi, K., Eslami, B., 2022. Multi-Parameter Optimization of 3D Printing Condition for Enhanced Quality and Strength. Polymers, 14(8), 1586. DOI: 10.3390/polym14081586Search in Google Scholar

Kantaros, A., Karalekas, D., 2013. Fiber Bragg grating based investigation of residual strains in ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling process. Materials & Design, 50, 44–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes. 2013.02.067Search in Google Scholar

Kechagias, J., Chaidas, D., Vidakis, N., Salonitis, K., Vaxevanidis, N. M., 2022. Key parameters controlling surface quality and dimensional accuracy: a critical review of FFF process. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 37(9), 963–984. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2022.2032144Search in Google Scholar

Le-Bail, A., Maniglia, B. C., Le-Bail, P., 2020. Recent advances and future perspective in additive manufacturing of foods based on 3D printing. Current Opinion in Food Science, 35, 54–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs. 2020.01.009Search in Google Scholar

Markiz, N., Horváth, E., Ficzere, P., 2020. Influence of printing direction on 3D printed ABS specimens. Production Engineering Archives, 26(3), 127–130. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.24Search in Google Scholar

Mohanavel, V., Ashraff Ali, K. S., Ranganathan, K., Allen Jeffrey, J., Ravikumar, M. M., Rajkumar, S., 2021. The roles and applications of additive manufacturing in the aerospace and automobile sector. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 405–409. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.596Search in Google Scholar

Mousa, A. A., 2014. The Effects of Content and Surface Modification of Filler on the Mechanical Properties of Selective Laser Sintered Polyamide12 Composites. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 8, 265–274.Search in Google Scholar

Onwubolu, G. C., Rayegani, F., 2014. Characterization and Optimization of Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Manufactured by the Fused Deposition Modelling Process. International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 2014, 1–13. DOI: 10.1155/2014/598531 Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., Marinescu, R., 2018. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review. Polymer Testing, 69, 157–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020Search in Google Scholar

Safronov, V. A., Khmyrov, R. S., Kotoban, D. v., Gusarov, A. v., 2017. Distortions and Residual Stresses at Layer-by-Layer Additive Manufacturing by Fusion. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 139(3). DOI: 10.1115/1.4034714Search in Google Scholar

Samy, A. A., Golbang, A., Harkin-Jones, E., Archer, E., Tormey, D., McIlhagger, A., 2021. Finite element analysis of residual stress and warp-age in a 3D printed semi-crystalline polymer: Effect of ambient temperature and nozzle speed. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 70, 389–399. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.054Search in Google Scholar

Tlegenov, Y., Hong, G. S., Lu, W. F., 2018. Nozzle condition monitoring in 3D printing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 54, 45–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.05.010Search in Google Scholar

Trško, L., Lago, J., Jambor, M., Nový, F., Bokůvka, O., Florková, Z., 2020. Microstructure and residual stress analysis of Strenx 700 MC welded joint. Production Engineering Archives, 26(2), 41–44. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.09Search in Google Scholar

Withers, P. J., Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H., 2001. Residual stress part 1 - Measurement techniques. Materials Science and Technology, 17(4), 355–365. DOI: 10.1179/026708301101509980Search in Google Scholar

Xia, H., Lu, J., Dabiri, S., Tryggvason, G., 2018. Fully resolved numerical simulations of fused deposition modeling. Part I: fluid flow. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 24(2), 463–476. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-12-2016-0217/FULL/XMLSearch in Google Scholar

Xiaoyong, S., Liangcheng, C., Honglin, M., Peng, G., Zhanwei, B., Cheng, L., 2017. Experimental analysis of high temperature PEEK materials on 3D printing test. Proceedings - 9th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA 2017, 13–16. DOI: 10.1109/ICMTMA.2017.0012Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Kevin Chou, Y., 2008. 3D FEA Simulations of Fused Deposition Modeling Process. Proceedings of the International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2006, 1121–1128. DOI: 10.1115/MSEC2006-21132 Search in Google Scholar