[
Adkins, L. C., Moomaw, R. L., & Savvides, A. (2002). Institutions, freedom, and technical efficiency. Southern economic journal, 69(1), 92-108. DOI: 10.2307/106155810.2307/1061558
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agostino, M., Di Tommaso, M. R., Nifo, A., Rubini, L., & Trivieri, F. (2020). Institutional quality and firms’ productivity in European regions. Regional Studies, 54(9), 1275-1288. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2020.171268910.1080/00343404.2020.1712689
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allegra, E., Forni, M., Grillo, M., & Magnani, L. (2004). Antitrust Policy and National Growth: Some Evidence from Italy. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 63(1), 69-86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1981). Estimation of dynamic models with error components. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(375), 589-606. DOI:10.2307/228751710.1080/01621459.1981.10477691
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1983). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), 570-606. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-110.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andrews, D. W., & Lu, B. (2001). Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 101(1), 123-164. DOI:10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-410.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. DOI: 10.2307/229796810.2307/2297968
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnone, M., & Scalise, D. (2005). Macroeconomic Effects of Deregulation in Goods Market with Heterogeneous Firms. Macroeconomics - University Library of Munich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blanchard, O., & Giavazzi, F. (2003). Macroeconomic Effects of Regulation and Deregulation in Goods and Labor Markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 879-907. DOI: 10.1162/0033553036069845010.1162/00335530360698450
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and movement restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87(1), str. 115-143.10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bouis, R., Duval, R., & Eugster, J. (2016). Product Market Deregulation and Growth: New Country-Industry-Level Evidence. IMF Working Papers 16(114). DOI: 10.5089/9781484385029.00110.5089/9781484385029.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourlés, R., Cette, G., Lopez, J., Mairesse, J., & Nicoletti, G. (2013). Do Product Market Regulations in Upstream Sectors Curb Productivity Growth? Panel Data Evidence for OECD Countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1750-1768. DOI: 10.3386/w1652010.3386/w16520
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bräutigam, D., & Woolcock, M. (2001). Small states in a global economy: The role of institutions in managing vulnerability and opportunity in small developing countries (No. 2001/37). WIDER Discussion Paper.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruno, G. S. (2005). Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Economics Letters, 87(3), 361-366. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2005.01.00510.1016/j.econlet.2005.01.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buddelmeyer, H., Jensen, P., Oğuzoğlu, U., & Webster, E. (2008). Fixed Effects Bias in Panel Data Estimators. IZA Dicussion Paper No. 3487, 1-7.10.2139/ssrn.1136288
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cacciatore, M., Fiori, G., & Ghironi, F. (2015). Market Deregulation and Optimal Monetary Policy in a Monetary Union. Journal of International Economics, 120-137. DOI: 10.3386/w1902510.3386/w19025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chacar, A. S., Newburry, W., & Vissa, B. (2010). Bringing institutions into performance persistence research: Exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1119-1140.10.1057/jibs.2010.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chanda, A., & Dalgaard, C. J. (2008). Dual economies and international total factor productivity differences: Channelling the impact from institutions, trade, and geography. Economica, 75(300), 629-661. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00673.x10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00673.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Correa-López, M., & Doménech, R. (2014). Does anti-competitive service sector regulation harm exporters? Evidence from manufacturing firms in Spain. BBVA Research WP, 14, 13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Pina-Cabral, J. (1989). The Mediterranean as a category of regional comparison: a critical view. Current Anthropology, 30(3), 399-406. DOI: /10.1086/20375810.1086/203758
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Égert, B. (2016). Regulation, institutions, and productivity: new macroeconomic evidence from OECD countries. American Economic Review, 106(5), 109-13. DOI: 10.1257/aer.p2016102610.1257/aer.p20161026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Franičević, V., & Bićanić, I. (2007). EU Accession and Croatia’s Two Economic Goals: Modern Economic Growth and Modern Regulated Capitalism. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 7(4), 637-663. DOI:10.1080/1468385070172610410.1080/14683850701726104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gal, P. N., & Hijzen, A. (2016). The Short-term impact of product market reforms. IMF Working Papers 2016(116). DOI: 10.5089/9781475516852.00110.5089/9781475516852.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilmore, D. D. (Ed.). (1987). Honor and Shame and the Unity of the Mediterranean (Vol. 22). Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilson, R. J., & Kraakman, R. (2003). The mechanisms of market efficiency twenty years later: The hindsight bias. Journal of Corporation Law, 28(4), 715-742.10.2139/ssrn.462786
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gouveia, A. F., Santos, S., & Gonçalves, I. (2017). The impact of structural reforms on productivity: The role of the distance to the technological frontier. OECD Productivity working papers May 2017 No.8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ivanković, Ž. (2017). The Political Economy of Crony Capitalism: A Case Study of the Collapse of the Largest Croatian Conglomerate. Croatian Political Science Review, 54(4), 40-60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judson, R., & Owen, A. (1999). Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists. Economic letters, 65(1), 9-15. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00130-510.1016/S0165-1765(99)00130-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay and Massimo Mastruzzi (2010). “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1682130)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiviet, J. F. (1995). On bias, inconsistency and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 53-78. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-E10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-E
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiviet, J. F. (2020). Microeconometric dynamic panel data methods: Model specification and selection issues. Econometrics and Statistics, 13(1), 16-45. DOI:10.1016/j.ecosta.2019.08.00310.1016/j.ecosta.2019.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kotarski, K., & Petak, Z. (2019). Croatia’s Post-communist Transition Experience: The Paradox of Initial Advantage Turning into a Middle-Income Trap. In Z. Petak, & K. Kotarski(ed.), Policy Making at the European Periphery. Palgrave Macmillan, 1-25.10.1007/978-3-319-73582-5_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kripfganz, S. (9. September 2019). Generalized method of moments estimation of linear dynamic panel data models. Downloaded 28. 03. 2021 from Stata Conferences: https://www.stata.com/meeting/uk19/slides/uk19_kripfganz.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. DOI:10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-710.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mosquera, P. M. R., Manstead, A. S., & Fischer, A. H. (2002). Honor in the Mediterranean and northern Europe. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 33(1), 16-36. DOI: 10.1177/002202210203300100210.1177/0022022102033001002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo978051180867810.1017/CBO9780511808678
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pattnaik, C. & Choe, S. (2007). Do institutional quality and institutional distance impact subsidiary performance? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007 (1), 1-6. DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2007.2650837110.5465/ambpp.2007.26508371
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodríguez-Pose, A., Ganau, R., Maslauskaite, K., & Brezzi, M. (2020). Credit constraints, labor productivity, and the role of regional institutions: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Europe. Journal of Regional Science. 1-30. DOI: 10.1111/jors.1251410.1111/jors.12514
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-165. DOI: 10.1023/b:joeg.0000031425.72248.8510.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogić Dumančić, L., Bogdan, Ž., & Raguž Krištić, I. (2021). Institutions and Product Market Efficiency in the European Union with Emphasis on Croatia. Accepted for the Conference Region, Entrepreneurship, Development - Faculty of Economics in Osijek.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roodman, D. (2009). Practitioners’ corner: A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135-158. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sargan, D. J. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26(3), 393-415. DOI:10.2307/190761910.2307/1907619
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwab(ed.), K. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwab(ed.), K. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018–2019. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Škrabić-Perić, B. (2019). Do the most frequently used dynamic panel data estimators have the best performance in a small sample? A Monte Carlo comparison? Operational Research Review, 10(1), 45-54. DOI: 10.17535/crorr.2019.000510.17535/crorr.2019.0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Veenendaal, W. (2019). How Smallness Fosters Clientelism: A Case Study of Malta. Political Studies, 67(4), str. 1034-1052. DOI: 10.1177/003232171982827510.1177/0032321719828275
]Search in Google Scholar
[
World Bank (various years). Worldwide Governance Indicators project. World Bank Development Research Group. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home. (Accessed on: March 19th, 2019)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weil, D. N. (2009). Economic Growth (3rd ed.). Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar