[
Al-Tabbaa, O., & Ankrah, S. (2016). Social capital to facilitate “engineered” university-industry collaboration for technology transfer: A dynamic perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.02710.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.00510.1016/j.respol.2008.07.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34(7), 1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.00910.1016/j.respol.2005.05.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2005). The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behaviour: Demographics or Opportunities? (No. 11348; NBER Working Paper, Vol. 1).10.3386/w11348
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baglieri, D., Baldi, F., & Tucci, C. L. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation, 76–77, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.00310.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beath, J., Owen, R. F., Poyago-Theotoky, J., & Ulph, D. (2003). Optimal incentives for income-generation in universities: the rule of thumb for the Compton tax. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1301–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00084-510.1016/S0167-7187(03)00084-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belitski, M., Aginskaja, A., & Marozau, R. (2019). Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding? Research Policy, 48(3), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.01110.1016/j.respol.2018.10.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtie, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, 44(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.00810.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S., Link, A. N., Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2015). Concise Guide to Entrepreneurship, Technology and Innovation. In D. B. Audretsch, C. S. Hayter, & A. N. Link (Eds.), Concise Guide to Entrepreneurship, Technology and Innovation (Issue June). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/978178347420210.4337/9781783474202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caldera, A., & Debande, O. (2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39(9), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.01610.1016/j.respol.2010.05.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A.-C. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1–2), 199–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-002-0105-010.1007/s00191-002-0105-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cesaroni, F., Conti, G., & Piccaluga, A. (2005). Technology Transfer Offices (TTO) in Italian.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, Y. C., Chen, M. H., Hua, M., & Yang, P. Y. (2006). Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a “scientific-economic” framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.00410.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Condom, P., Ignasi, C., Alberto, O., Roger, P., Jose Maria, E., & Villà. (2008). From Research to Market: Key Issues of Technology Transfer from Public Research Centres to Businesses.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.00310.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102167461865810.1023/A:1021674618658
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Good, M., Knockaert, M., Soppe, B., & Wright, M. (2019). The technology transfer ecosystem in academia. An organizational design perspective. In Technovation (Vols. 82–83, pp. 35–50). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.00910.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.00510.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hellmann, T. (2005). The Role of Patents for Bridging the Science to Market Gap.10.3386/w11460
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monika Boguszewicz-Kreft, Athanasios Arvanitis, Kostas Karatzas, Gilda Antonelli, Biagio Simonetti https://doi.org/10.3386/w1146010.3386/w11460
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hockaday, T. (2014). Spin-out versus Licence. What are the differences between a Spin-out and a Licence in university technology transfer? How do you decide which to do? Oxford University Innovation, October.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horner, S., Jayawarna, D., Giordano, B., & Jones, O. (2019). Strategic choice in universities: Managerial agency and effective technology transfer. Research Policy, 48(5), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.01510.1016/j.respol.2019.01.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoye, K., & Pries, F. (2009). ‘Repeat commercializers,’ the ‘habitual entrepreneurs’ of university–industry technology transfer. Technovation, 29(10), 682–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.00810.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hsu, D. H., & Berstein, T. (1997). Managing the university technology licensing process. Findings and case studies. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 9, 1–33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hsu, D. W. L., Shen, Y. C., Yuan, B. J. C., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.00210.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2004). Patent Licensing and the Research University. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1075810.3386/w10758
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kneller, R. (2001). Technology transfer: A review for biomedical researchers. In Clinical Cancer Research.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing in Universities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2–3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1162/15424760432306796110.1162/154247604323067961
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2008). Incentives and invention in universities. The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(2), 403–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00020.x10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00020.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Łobacz, K. (2018). Knowledge transfer at universities: can technology transfer offices, business incubators and science and technology parks in Poland provide good support services? European Journal of Service Management, 28, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.18276/ejsm.2018.28/1-2310.18276/ejsm.2018.28/1-23
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MIT TLO. (2020). Learn About Intellectual Property. MIT TLO Technology Licensing Office. http://tlo.mit.edu/learn-about-intellectual-property/technology-transfer-process,
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.01110.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Renault, C. S. (2006). Academic Capitalism and University Incentives for Faculty Entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6108-x10.1007/s10961-005-6108-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2014). Articulating the “three-missions” in Spanish universities. Research Policy, 43(10), 1760–1773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.00110.1016/j.respol.2014.06.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101111020788510.1023/A:1011110207885
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sengupta, A., & Ray, A. S. (2017a). University research and knowledge transfer: A dynamic view of ambidexterity in british universities. Research Policy, 46(5), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.00810.1016/j.respol.2017.03.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sengupta, A., & Ray, A. S. (2017b). Choice of Structure, Business Model and Portfolio: Organizational Models of Knowledge Transfer Offices in British Universities. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.1222410.1111/1467-8551.12224
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/grm03610.1093/icb/grm036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic Entrepreneurship: Time for a Rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.1211610.1111/1467-8551.12116
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm01510.1093/icc/dtm015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, C. D. (2011). Your idea and your university: Issues in academic technology transfer. Journal of Investigative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e31820d0fdf10.2310/JIM.0b013e31820d0fdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-810.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thursby, M., Thursby, J., & Gupta-Mukherjee, S. (2007). Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.01610.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Norman, G. A., & Eisenkot, R. (2017a). Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization: Part 1: Intellectual Property Rights—Basics of Patents and Copyrights. JACC: Basic to Translational Science, 2(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.01.00310.1016/j.jacbts.2017.01.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Norman, G. A., & Eisenkot, R. (2017b). Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization: Part 2: The Commercialization Process. JACC: Basic to Translational Science, 2(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.03.00410.1016/j.jacbts.2017.03.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.4250050207/abstract10.1002/smj.4250050207
]Search in Google Scholar