Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
AHEAD OF PRINT
Open Access
Why Do So Few Preliminary Questions Come From Czechia?
Tereza Kunertová
Tereza Kunertová
| Jun 04, 2024
Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
AHEAD OF PRINT
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Jun 04, 2024
Page range:
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2023-0020
Keywords
preliminary ruling
,
preliminary question
,
definition of court
,
Court of Justice of the European Union
,
direct effect
,
harmonious interpretation
,
primacy of EU law
,
Directive 2012/34/EU
,
railway sector
© 2023 Tereza Kunertová, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Tereza Kunertová