Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Vision Rehabilitation International
Volume 14 (2023): Issue 1 (December 2023)
Open Access
Teaching intersection analysis to students with low vision
Joseph P Nemargut
Joseph P Nemargut
| Dec 28, 2023
Vision Rehabilitation International
Volume 14 (2023): Issue 1 (December 2023)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Dec 28, 2023
Page range:
-
Accepted:
Nov 14, 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/vri-2024-0002
Keywords
Low vision
,
visual scanning
,
intersection
,
risk
© 2023 Joseph P Nemargut, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
A) Schematic of a risk analysis diagram of a simple two-way plus-shaped intersection controlled by stop signs. B) Risks associated with the initial crossing from the southeast to the northeast corner of the intersection. C) Risks associated with the crossing from the northeast to the northwest corner of the intersection to reach the destination.
Figure 2.
A) Schematic of a risk analysis diagram of a complex two-way offset intersection controlled by stop signs and road markings. B) Risks associated with the crossing from the southeast to the northeast corner of the intersection. C) Risks associated with the crossing from the northeast to the northwest corner of the intersection to reach the destination.
Figure 3.
A) Schematic of a visual scanning plan of a simple two-way plus-shaped intersection controlled by stop signs. B) Visual scanning plan at the initial crossing on the southeast corner of the intersection; scanning plan ordered from 1 to 3. C) Visual scanning indicated after beginning the crossing (indicated by an X) before entering the second part of the crossing heading north. D) Visual scanning plan at the second crossing on the northeast corner of the intersection; scanning plan ordered from 1 to 3. E) Visual scanning indicated after beginning the crossing (indicated by an X) before entering the second part of the crossing headed west towards the destination.
Figure 4.
A) Schematic of a visual scanning plan of a complex two-way offset intersection controlled by stop signs and road markings. B) Visual scanning plan at the initial crossing on the southeast corner of the intersection; scanning plan ordered from 1 to 2. C) Visual scanning plan in the first lane of the first part of the crossing (indicated by an X) heading north; scanning plan ordered from 1 to 2. D) Visual scanning plan in the second lane of the first part of the crossing (indicated by an X) heading north before entering the 2nd part of the crossing. E) Visual scanning plan at the second crossing on the northeast corner of the intersection; scanning plan ordered from 1 to 2. F) Visual scanning plan in the first lane of the second crossing in first part of the crossing (indicated by an X) heading west; scanning ordered from 1 to 2. G) Visual scanning plan in the second lane of the second crossing in the first part of the crossing (indicated by an X) heading west. H) Visual scanning plan in the first lane of the second crossing in the second part of the crossing (indicated by an X) heading west towards the destination.
Preview