[1. Abukawa H, Papadaki M, Abulikemu M, Leaf J, Vacanti JP, Kaban LB, Troulis MJ. The engineering of craniofacial tissues in the laboratory: a review of biomaterials for scaffolds and implant coatings // Dent Clin North Am, 2006; 50: 205-216. ]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Anitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, Andia I. Fiveyear clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study // J Periodontol, 2008; 79: 42-48. ]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study // Clin Implant Dent Rel Res, 2001; 3: 39-49. ]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Browaeys H, Bouvry P, De Bruyn H. A literature review on biomaterials in sinus augmentation procedures // Clin Implant Dent Related Res, 2007; 9: 166-177. ]Search in Google Scholar
[5. De Vicente JC, Hernandez-Vallejo G, Brana- Abascal P, Pena I. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2010; 21 : 430-438. ]Search in Google Scholar
[6. El-Ghannam A. Bone reconstruction: from bioceramics to tissue engineering // Expert review of medical devices, 2005; 2: 87-101. ]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A prospective 1 - year clinical and radiographical study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone // J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002; 3: 277-284. ]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 2:1 autogenous bone/ xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants // Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004; 15: 339-345. ]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Heinemann F, Mundt T, Biffar R, Gedrange T, Goetz W. A 3-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed simultaneously with maxillary sinus floor augmentations using new nanocrystaline hydroxyapatite // J Physiol Pharmacol, 2009; 60: 91-97. ]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Henkel KO, Gerber T, Lenz S, Gundlach KK, Bienengraber V. Macroscopical, histological and morphometric studies of porous bone-replacement materials in minipigs 8 months after implantation // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2006; 102:606-613. ]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Hirsch JM, Ohrnell LO, Henry PJ, Andersson L, Brånemark PI, Chiapasco M, Gynther G, Finne K, Higuchi KW, Isaksson S, Kahnberg KE, Malevez C, Neukam FW, Sevetz E, Urgell JP, Widmark G, Bolind P. A clinical evaluation of the zygoma fixture: one year of follow-up in 16 clinics // J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004; 62: 22-29. ]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Kahnberg KE, Wallstrom M, Rasmusson L. Local sinus lift for single - tooth implant. I. Clinical and radiographical follow - up // Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2011; Sept: 231-237. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00201.x19744198]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Kirmeier R, Payer M, Wehrschuetz M, Jakse N, Platzer S, Lorenzoni M. Evaluation of three - dimentional changes after sinus floor augmentation with different grafting materials // Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008; Apr: 366 - 372. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01487.x18324958]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindstrom H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2000; 15: 405-414. ]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Lambert F, Leonard A, Drion P, Sourice S, Layrolle P, Rompen E. Influence of space-filling materials in subantral bone augmentation: blood clot vs. autogenous bone ships vs. bovine hydroxyapatite // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2011; 22 : 538-545. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02069.x21198906]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Maiorana C, Sigurta D, Mirandola A, Garlini G, Santoro F. Bone resorption around dental implants placed in grafted sinuses: clinical and radiological follow-up after up to 4 years // Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants, 2005; 20: 261-266. ]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study// Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2005; 7: 104-110. ]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, Chipasco M, Lops D. Short (8 mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14 year longitudinal study // Int J Prosthodont, 2006; 19: 586-592. ]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Salma I., Pilmane M., Skagers A., Vetra J., Salms G., Berzina-Cimdina L., Serzane R. Early morphofunctional response of contact tissue after intraosal implantation in rabbit jaw of pure synthetic hydroxyapatite bioceramic materials and HAp saturated with lidocaine // Stomatologija, 2009; 11: 4: 113-118. ]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Salms G, Skagers A, Zigurs G, Salma I, Cimdina R, Berzina L, Priednieks J. Outcome of SEMADOS dental implants in one stage with sinus floor elevation by HAp granules // Stomatologija, 2002; 4: 2 - 8. ]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Sbordone L, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris G, Sobrdone C, Guidetti F. Implant success in sinus - lifted maxillae and native bone: a 3 - year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009; 24: 316-324. ]Search in Google Scholar
[22. ten Bruggenkate CM, Asikainen P, Foizik C, Krekeler G, Sultter F. Short (6-mm) nonsubmergent dental implants : results of a multicenter clinical trial of 1 to 7 years // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1998; 13: 791-795. ]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Warnke PH, Seitz H, Warnke F, Becker ST, Sivananthan S, Sherry E, Liu Q, Wiltfang J, Douglas T. Ceramic scaffolds produced by computer - assisted 3D printing and sintering: characterization and biocompatibility investigation // J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2010; 93: 212-217. ]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Zijderveld SA, Schulten EA, Aartman IH, ten Bruggenkate CM. Long - term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow - up of 4.5 years // Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009; Jul: 691-700. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01697.x]Search in Google Scholar
