[Baudrillard J., 1994 (1st ed. 1979). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.10.3998/mpub.9904]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauman Z., 1992. Intimations of postmodernity. Routledge, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beck U., 1992. Risk society. Towards a new modernity. Sage, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourassa S.C., 1991. The aesthetic of landscape. Belhaven Press, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown R.H., 1989. Social science as a civic discourse. Essays on the invention, legitimation and uses of social theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burckhardt L., 1980. Niemandsland (No man's land). In: Burckhardt L. (ed.), Warum ist Landschaft schön? Die Spaziergangswissenschaft. Schitz, Kassel: 140-141.]Search in Google Scholar
[Byrne D., 2001. Understanding the urban. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, New York.10.1007/978-1-137-18512-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Clifford D., 1962. A history of garden design. Faber and Faber, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Croce B., 1995. Guide to aesthetics. Hackett Publ., Cambridge, Indianapolis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis M., 1998. Ecology of fear. Los Angeles and the imagination of disaster. Metropolitan Books, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dear M.J., 2000. The postmodern urban condition. Blackwell, Oxford.10.4135/9781446218723.n4]Search in Google Scholar
[Elias N., 2000 (1st ed. 1939). The civilizing process. Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Blackwell, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fayet R., 2003. Reinigungen. Vom Abfall der Moderne zum Kompost der Nachmoderne (Purifications. From the waste of the modern to the compost of the postmodern). Passagen-Verl., Wien.]Search in Google Scholar
[Flusty S., 1997. Building paranoia. In: Ellin N. (ed.), Architecture of fear. Princeton Architectural Press, New York: 48-52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foerster H. v., 1992. Entdecken oder Erfinden. Wie lässt sich Verstehen verstehen? (Discover or invent. How is understanding to be understood?). In: Gumin H. & Meier H. (eds), Einführung in den Konstruktivismus. Piper, München, Zürich: 41-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuller G., 1992. Kitsch-Art. Wie Kitsch zur Kunst wird (Kitsch-art. How kitsch gets to be art). DuMont, Köln.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodman N., 1968. Languages of art: an approach to a theory of symbols. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodman N., 1992. Kunst und Erkenntnis (Art and knowledge). In: Henrich D. & Iser W. (eds), Theorien der Kunst. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.: 569-591.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gross M., 2006. Natur (Nature). Transcript, Bielefeld.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartz A. & Kühne O., 2007. Der Regionalpark Saar - eine Betrachtung aus postmoderner Perspektive (The Regional Park Saar - an investigation from the perspective of postmodernity). Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 1: 30-43.10.1007/BF03183821]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartz A. & Kühne O., 2009. Aesthetic approaches to active urban landscape planning: European exemplars. In: van der Valk A. & van Dijk T. (eds), Regional planning for open space. Routledge, London: 249-278.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartz A. & Kühne O., 2010. Large-scale nature conservation projects as impulse for a pro-active landscape policy in postindustrial regions. In: Carsjens G.J. (ed.), Landscape legacy: Landscape architecture and planning between art and science. Proceedings of CELA-ISOMUL conference, May 12-14, 2010. Maastricht.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hasse J., 2000. Die Wunden der Stadt. Für eine neue Ästhetik unserer Städte (The wounds of our city. Towards a new aesthetic of our cities). Passagen-Verl., Wien.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harvey D., 1989. The condition of postmodernity. Blackwell, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horkheimer M., 1982 (1st ed. 1937). Critical theory: selected essays. Continuum Pub. Corp., New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Illing F., 2006. Kitsch, Kommerz und Kult. Soziologie des schlechten Geschmacks (Kitsch, commerce and cult. Sociology of bad taste). UVK-Verl.-Ges, Konstanz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jameson F., 1984. Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146: 53-92.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jessel B., 2004. Von der Kulturlandschaft zur Landschafts-Kultur in Europa. Für die Zukunft: Handlungsmaximen statt fester Leitbilder (From cultural landscape to landscape culture in Europe. For the future: guiding principles instead of fixed mission statements). Stadt + Grün, 2: 20-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jessel B., 2005. Landschaft (Landscape). In: Ritter E.-H. (ed.), Handwörterbuch der Raumordnung. Verlag der ARL, Hannover: 579-586.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kühne O., 2006. Landschaft in der Postmoderne. Das Beispiel des Saarlandes (Landscape in the postmodern era. The example of the German state Saarland). Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kühne O., 2008. Distinktion - Macht - Landschaft. Zur sozialen Definition von Landschaft (Distinction - power - landscape. Towards the social definition of landscape). VS, Wiesbaden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kühne O. & Franke U., 2010. Romantische Landschaft. Impulse zur Wiederentdeckung der Romantik in der Landschafts- und Siedlungsgestaltung in der norddeutschen Kulturlandschaft. Ein Plädoyer (Romantic landscape. Impulses to the rediscovery of romantic in the design of landscapes and settlements in the north German cultural landscape. A plea). Oceano, Schwerin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lash S. & Urry J., 1994. Economies of signs and space. Sage, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Latour B., 1999. Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyotard J.-F., 1979. La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir (The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge). Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maturana H. & Varela F., 1987. The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala, Boston.]Search in Google Scholar
[Planungsgruppe agl, 2008. Projektantrag Landschaft der Industriekultur Nord (Saarland) (Project proposal of industrial culture landscape North (Saarland)). Ministerium für Umwelt, Saarbrücken.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schütz A., 1971. Gesammelte Aufsätze 1. Das Problem der Wirklichkeit (Collected essays. The problem of reality). Nijhoff, Den Haag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schütz A., 1972. The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press, Evanston.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simmel G., 1990 (1st ed. 1913). Philosophie der Landschaft (Philosophy of landscape). In: Gröning G. & Herlyn U. (eds), Landschaftswahrnehmung und Landschaftserfahrung. Minerva-Publ, München: 67-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sloterdijk P., 1987. Kopernikanische Mobilmachung und ptolemäische Abrüstung. Ästhetischer Versuch (Copernican mobilisation and Ptolemaic disarmament. An aesthetic try). Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sloterdijk P., 1988. Critique of cynical reason. University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soja E.W., 2000. Postmetropolis. Critical studies of cities and regions. Blackwell, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Solso R.L., MacLin O.H. & MacLin K., 2008. Cognitive psychology. Pearson, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Munich.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNESCO, 2009. International Coordinating Council of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme. Twenty-first session, 25-29 May 2009 http://www.unesco.org/mab/doc/icc/2009/e_NewBRs.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Vester H.-G., 1993. Soziologie der Postmoderne (Postmodern sociology). Quintessenz, München.]Search in Google Scholar
[Welsch W., 1995. Ästhetisches Denken (Aesthetic thinking). Reclam, Stuttgart.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wood G., 2003. Die postmoderne Stadt: Neue Formen der Urbanität im Übergang vom zweiten ins dritte Jahrtausend (The postmodern city: New forms of urbanity in the transition from the second to the third millennium). In: Gebhardt H., Reuber P. & Wolkersdorfer G. (eds), Kulturgeographie - Aktuelle Ansätze und Entwicklungen. Spektrum, Heidelberg, Berlin: 131-147.]Search in Google Scholar
