1. bookVolume 14 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1691-5534
ISSN
1691-4147
First Published
04 May 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Course Curricular Design and Development of the M.Sc. Programme in the Field of Ict in Education for Sustainable Development

Published Online: 27 Mar 2013
Volume & Issue: Volume 14 (2012) - Issue 2 (December 2012)
Page range: 5 - 40
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1691-5534
ISSN
1691-4147
First Published
04 May 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English

Abdullah, M., Parasuraman, B., Muniapan, B., Koren, S., & Jones, M. L. (2008). Motivating factors associated with adult participation in distance learning program. InternationalEducation Studies, 1(4), 104-109.10.5539/ies.v1n4p104Search in Google Scholar

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States,2005. Retrieved August 5, 2012, from http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/growing_by_degrees.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Aristotle. (2004). The Nicomachean ethics. (J. A. K. Thomson, trans.). London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, A. E. (2002). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing the new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 119-144.10.1353/rhe.2002.0031Search in Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. EducationalAssessment, Evaluation & Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5Search in Google Scholar

Bush, M. D., & Mott, J. D. (2009). The transformation of learning with technology: Learnercentricity, content and tool malleability, and network effects. Educational Technology, 49(3), 3-20.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, K., Schwier, R. A., & Kenny, R. F. (2005). Agency of the instructional designer: Moral coherence and transformative social practice. Australasian Journal of EducationalTechnology, 21(2), 242-262. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/campbell.html10.14742/ajet.1337Search in Google Scholar

Cey, T. (2001). Moving towards constructivist classroom. Retrieved December 19, 2009, from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/ceyt/ceyt.htmSearch in Google Scholar

Cranton, P. (1994). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educatorsof adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Daley, D. M. (1991). Great expectations or a tale of two systems: Employee attitudes toward graphic rating scales & MBO-based performance appraisal. Public AdministrationQuarterly, 15(2), 188-209.Search in Google Scholar

Darder, A., Baltodano, M., & Torres, R. D. (2003). The critical pedagogy reader. London: Routledge Falmer.Search in Google Scholar

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

De Haan, G. (2006). ‘The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: A ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’ - based model for education for sustainable development’. Environmental EducationResearch, 12(1), 19-32.10.1080/13504620500526362Search in Google Scholar

Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivist and the technology of instruction: Aconversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2010). Insights to transformative learning through education for sustainable development. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 96-113.Search in Google Scholar

Engstrom, M., Santo, S., & Yost, R. (2008). Knowledge building in an online cohort. TheQuarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(2), 151-167.Search in Google Scholar

European University Association. (2006). Guidelines for quality enhancement in Europeanjoint master programmes. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/EMNEM_report.1147364824803.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Fien, J., & Tilbury, D. (1996). Learning for a sustainable environment: An agenda for teachereducation in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Frey, B., & Alman, S. (2003). Applying adult learning theory to the online classroom. NewHorizons in Adult Education, 17(1), 4-12. Retrieved July 10, 2011, from http://education.fiu.edu/newhorizons/journals/volume17n1.pdf10.1002/nha3.10155Search in Google Scholar

Galloway, D. (2005). Evaluating distance learning and e-learning: Is Kirkpatrick’s model relevant?. Performance Improvement, 44(4), 21-27. DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4140440407.10.1002/pfi.4140440407Search in Google Scholar

Garvin, D. A. (2000). Learning in action: A guide to putting the learning organization to work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gikandi, J. (2011). Achieving meaningful online learning through effective formative assessment. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands,changing directions (pp. 452-454). Retrieved March 15, 2012, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs.Gikandi-poster.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Giroux, H. (n.d.). Teachers as transformatory intellectuals. Symposium on understandingquality education. Conference on re-envisioning quality education. Retrieved March, 15, 2012, from http://www.afed.itacec.org/document/henry_giroux_2_ok.pdfGiroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals. Boston, MA: Bergin & Garvey.Search in Google Scholar

Glasser, H. (2007). Minding the gap: The role of social learning in linking our stated desire for a more sustainable world to our everyday actions and policies. In A. E. J. Wals, (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainable world. Principles, perspectives, and praxis (pp. 35-62). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. New York: The Falmer Press.Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann.Search in Google Scholar

Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models,Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Hasselbring, T. S., & Moore, P. R. (1996). Developing mathematical literacy through the use of contextualized learning environments. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education,7(3/4), 199-222.Search in Google Scholar

Huckle, J. (1996). Realising sustainability in changing times. In J. Huckle & S. Sterling (Eds.), Education for sustainability (pp. 3-17). London, UK: Earthscan Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Huckle, J. (2008). An analysis of new labour’s policy on education for sustainable development (ESD) with particular reference to socially critical approaches. Environmental EducationResearch, 14(1), 65-75.Search in Google Scholar

Huckle, J. (2012). Teacher education for sustainability in network society: Combining digital and sustainability literacies. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 130-146.10.2478/v10099-012-0013-9Search in Google Scholar

Hudak, C. (2007). Linking instructional theories and instructional design to leaning objects: A proposed conceptual framework. In A. Koohang & K. Hamman (Eds.), Learning objectsand instructional designs (pp. 1-38). Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivist vs. constructivist: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology: Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.Search in Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34-37.Search in Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environment. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications andtechnology (pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivistperspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

IAU (International Association of Universities). (2006). Selected bibliography on educationand sustainable development. Retrieved October 14, 2011, from http://www.UNESCO.org/iau/sd/sd_bibliography.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking andlearning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1999). Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: Constructing order out of the chaos in the literature. Radical Pedagogy, 2(1). Retrieved July 5, 2008, from http://www.icaap.org/RadicalPedagogy/content/vol1.1999/issue2/02kanuka1_2.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Kenny, R. F., Zhang, Z., Schwier, R. A., & Campbell, K. (2005). A review of what instructional designers do: Questions answered and questions not asked. Canadian Journal of Learningand Technology, 31(1), 9-26.10.21432/T2JW2PSearch in Google Scholar

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.10.5465/amle.2005.17268566Search in Google Scholar

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355Search in Google Scholar

Lim, G. (2007). Instructional design and pedagogical consideration for the ins-and-outs of learning objects. In A. Koohang & K. Hamman (Eds.), Learning objects and instructionaldesigns (pp. 89-137). Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V. (2006). Preparing United Arab Emirates teachers for building a sustainable society. Heraklion: University of Crete.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V. (2008). An instructional design module of ICT that empowers teachers to integrate education for sustainable development across the curriculum. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Panhellenic Conference with InternationalParticipation on Information and Communication Technologies in Education (pp. 391-398). Cyprus: University of Cyprus.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V. (2010a). The challenge of WikiQuESD as an environment for constructing knowledge in teaching and learning for sustainable development. Discourse andCommunication for Sustainable Education, 1(1), 50-57.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V. (2010b). Strategies to reinforce the role of ICT in teaching and learning for sustainability. In M. Witthaus, K. Candless & R. Lambert (Eds.), Tomorrow today (pp. 169-171). Leicester: Tudor Rose on behalf of UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V. (2010c). ICT-enabled reorienting teacher education to address sustainable development: A case study. In T. Jimogiannis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th PanhellenicConference ICT in Education (pp. 1- 8). Korinthos: University of Peloponnese.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V. (2011a). Strategies for change towards sustainability in tertiary education supported by ICT. In ICT in teacher education: Policy, open educational resources andpartnership (pp. 152-166). Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V. (2011b). ICT-enabled education for sustainable development: Merging theory with praxis. In M. Youssef & S. Aziz Anwar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conferenceon e-Learning Excellence in the Middle East 2011 - in Search of New Paradigms for re-Engineering Education (pp. 410-419). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V. (2012). Critical issues for the course curricular design and development of postgraduate programmes. Proceedings of International Forum “Modern Information Society Formation: Problems, Perspectives, Innovation Approaches” (pp. 85-107). Saint-Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2005). Techno-sciences and mathematics: Vehicles for a sustainable future and global understanding. Proceedings of the 2nd InternationalConference on Hands on Science. HSci 2005 (pp. 103-108). Heraklion: University of Crete.Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012a). The challenges of ICTs to online climate change education for sustainable development: The ExConTra learning paradigm. In S.A. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on eLearning Excellence in the MiddleEast - Sustainable Innovation in Education (pp. 594-605). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.10.12816/0032071Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012b). Online course design for a joint M.Sc. programme on ICT in education for sustainable development. In S. A. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on eLearning Excellence in the Middle East - SustainableInnovation in Education (pp. 627-636). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.10.12816/0032071Search in Google Scholar

Makrakis, V., Kostoulas-Makrakis, N., & Kanbar, N. (2012). Developing and validating an ESD student competence framework: A Tempus-RUCAS initiative. In S. A. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on eLearning Excellence in the Middle East - SustainableInnovation in Education (pp. 585-594). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.Search in Google Scholar

Marsick, V., & Mezirow, J. (2002). New work on transformative learning. Teachers collegerecord. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=10876Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, R. H. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: New paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 141-159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

McLaren, P. (1994). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations ofeducation. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as a discourse. Journal of TransformativeEducation, 1(1), 58-63.10.1177/1541344603252172Search in Google Scholar

Meyers, S. (2008). Using transformative pedagogy when teaching online. College Teaching,56(4), 219-224. DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.56.4.219-224.10.3200/CTCH.56.4.219-224Search in Google Scholar

Nam, C. S., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2007). Web-based learning environment: A theory-based design process for developopment and evaluation. Journal of Information TechnologyEducation, 6, 23-43.Search in Google Scholar

Novak, J. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as tools to understandand facilitate the process in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.10.4324/9781410601629Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, G. (2010). Initiating curriculum revision: Exploring the practices of educational developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(1), 61-71. DOI: 10.1080/13601440903529927.10.1080/13601440903529927Search in Google Scholar

Oppermann, R., & Specht, M. (2006). Situated learning in the process of work. In D. Hung & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies (pp. 69-89). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, E. (2003). Bringing a perspective of transformative learning to globalized consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(4), 326-330. DOI: 10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00327.x.10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00327.xSearch in Google Scholar

Paas, L. (2008). How information and communications technologies can support education forsustainable development. Current uses and trends. Manitoba Canada: IISD.Search in Google Scholar

Pliner, S. M., & Johnson, J. R. (2004). Historical, theoretical, and foundational principles of universal instructional design in higher education. Equity & Excellence in Education,37(2), 105-113. DOI: 10.1080/10665680490453913.10.1080/10665680490453913Search in Google Scholar

Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc./Merrill Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Rychen, S., & Salganick, L. (2003). A holistic model of competence. In S. Rychen & L. Salagnick (Eds.), Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society (pp. 41-62). Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber.Search in Google Scholar

Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1996). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments:Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-148). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. (2005). Bridging the gap between knowledge management and e-learning with context-aware corporate learning solutions In K. Althoff, A. Dengel, R. Bergmann, M. Nick & T. R. Berghofer (Eds.), Professional knowledge management. Third biennial conference (pp. 203-213). WM 2005, Kaiserlautern, Germany: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. (2008). Enabling learning on demand in semantic work environments: The learning in process approach In J. Rech, B. Decker & E. Ras (Eds.), Emerging technologiesfor semantic work environments: Techniques, methods and applications (pp. 1-21). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, A., & Braun, S. (2006). Context-aware workplace learning support: Concept, experiences, and remaining challenges. In W. Nejdl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.), Innovativeapproaches for learning and knowledge sharing. First European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2006) (pp. 518-524). Crete, Greece: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, S. S., McGuire, J. M., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial and SpecialEducation, 24(6), 369-379.10.1177/07419325030240060801Search in Google Scholar

Seitz, K., & Schreiber, J. R. (2005). Towards sustainable development - learning for a worldqualified for the future. A discussion paper of the Association of German development nongovernmental organisations (VENRO) on the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005-2014. VENRO-working paper No. 15.Search in Google Scholar

Shurville, S., Browne, T., & Whitaker, M. (2008). Employing educational technologists: A call for evidenced change. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of ASCILITE Melbourne 2008. Retrieved May 6, 2010, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/shurville.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Smith, M. K. (2000). Curriculum theory and practice. The encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved June 4, 2010, from www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htmSearch in Google Scholar

Sorensen, E. K., & Takle, E. S. (2005). Investigating knowledge building dialogues in networked communities of practice. A collaborative learning endeavor across cultures. InteractiveEducational Multimedia, 10, 50-60.Search in Google Scholar

Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. Duffy & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivismand the technology of instruction (pp. 57-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Search in Google Scholar

Squires, D. (1999). Educational software for constructivist learning environments: Subversive use and volatile design. Educational Technology, 39(3), 48-54.Search in Google Scholar

Summers, M., & Kruger, C. (2003). Teaching sustainable development in primary schools: Theory into practice. The Curriculum Journal, 14(2), 157-180. DOI: 10.1080/0958517032000095763.Search in Google Scholar

Svanstrom, M., Lozano-Garcia, F. J., & Rowe, D. (2008). Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in HigherEducation, 19(3), 339-351. DOI: 10.1108/14676370810885925.10.1108/14676370810885925Search in Google Scholar

Tilbury, D., Podger, D., & Reid, A. (2004). Action research for change towards sustainability:Change in curricula and graduate skills towards sustainability. Final report prepared for the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage and Macquarie University, September 2004.Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (1996). Learning: The treasure within, report to UNESCO of the international commission oneducation for the twentieth century. Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2003). TheDecade of Education for Sustainable Development: Framework for a draft internationalimplementation scheme. Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2005). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability,UNESCO education for sustainable development in action. Technical Paper No. 4. Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2010). Education for sustainable development lens: A policy and practice review tool. Education forsustainable development in action learning & training tools. No. 2. Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

Vare, P., & Scott, B. (2007). Learning for a change: Exploring the relationship between educationand sustainable development. Bath: Learning South West.Search in Google Scholar

Vrasidas, C. (2001). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of EducationalTelecommunications, 6(4), 339-362.Search in Google Scholar

Wade, R. (2012). Pedagogy, places and people. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability,14(2), 147-167.10.2478/v10099-012-0014-8Search in Google Scholar

Wals, A. E. J. (2007). Introduction. In A. E. J. Wals (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainableworld: Principles, perspectives, and praxis (pp. 17-32). Wageningen: Wageningen Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Wals, A. E. J., & Heymann, F. V. (2004). Learning on the edge: Exploring the change potential of conflict in social learning for sustainable living. In A. Wenden (Ed.), Educating for aculture of social and ecological peace (pp. 123-145). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wals, A. E. J., & Blaze Corcoran, P. (2006). Sustainability as an outcome of transformative learning. In J. Holmberg & B. E. Samuelson (Eds.), Drivers and barriers for implementingsustainable development in higher education (pp. 103-108). Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

Willis, J. (2000). The maturing of constructivist instructional design: Some basic principles that can guide practice. Educational Technology, 40(1), 5-16.Search in Google Scholar

WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our common future(Brundtland report). London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wenger, E., & Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo