Perception, Processing and Storage of Subphonemic and Extralinguistic Features in Spoken Word Recognition - An Argument from Language Variation and Change

Andruski, J. E., Blumstein, S. E. & Burton, M. (1994). The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition, 52, 163-87.10.1016/0010-0277(94)90042-6Search in Google Scholar

Chen, M. Y. & Wang, W. S-Y. (1975). Sound change: actuation and implementation. Language, 51, 255-292.10.2307/412854Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressSearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A. & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13 (3), 361-377.10.3758/BF03193857Search in Google Scholar

Gaskell, M. G. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: a distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Process, 12, 613-656.10.1080/016909697386646Search in Google Scholar

Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251Search in Google Scholar

Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B. & Logan, D. B. (1991). The nature of talker variability effect on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 152-162.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, M. (1985). Speculation about the representation of words in memory. In V. Fromkin (Ed.) Phonetic Linguistics (pp. 101-114). New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: an exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing. (pp. 145-166). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K. (2005). Speaker normalization in speech perception. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp. 363-389). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Joos, M. A. (1948). Acoustic phonetics. Language, 24, supplement 2, 1-136.10.2307/522229Search in Google Scholar

Jusczyk, P. W. (1993). From language general to language specific capacities. The WRAPSA model of how speech perception develops. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 3-28.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31319-1Search in Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1981). Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language, 57, 267-308.10.2307/413692Search in Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change, Volume 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, W., Yaeger, M. & Steiner, R. (1972). [LYS] A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Search in Google Scholar

Leach, E. (1998). Lvi-Strauss. 3rd edn. Translated by Piotr Niklewicz. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.Search in Google Scholar

Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. & Cooper, F. S. (1954). The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of stop and nasal consonants. Psychological Monographs, 68, 1-13.10.1037/h0093673Search in Google Scholar

Liberman, A. M. & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory revisited. Cognition, 21, 1-36.10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6Search in Google Scholar

Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., Auer, E. T. & Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood, activation, and PARSYN. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 615-625.10.3758/BF03212113Search in Google Scholar

Luce, P. A. & McLennan, C. T. (2005). Spoken word recognition: the challenge of variation. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp. 591-609). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1998). Chomsky. 3rd edn. Translated by Barbara Stanosz. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-kaSearch in Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1-86.10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0Search in Google Scholar

Mullennix, J. W. & Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 379-390.10.3758/BF03210878Search in Google Scholar

Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B. & Martin, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365-378.10.1121/1.397688Search in Google Scholar

Nygaard, L. C. (2005). Perceptual integration of linguistic and nonlinguistic properties of speech. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp. 390-413). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S. & Pisoni, D. B. (1992). Effects of speaking rate and talker variability on the representation of spoken words in memory. Proceedings 1992 International Conference on Spoken language Processing, (pp. 209-212). Banff, Canada.10.21437/ICSLP.1992-46Search in Google Scholar

Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S. & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5, 42-46.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00612.xSearch in Google Scholar

Paul, H. ([1880] 1891). Principles of the History of Language. Translated by H. A. Strong from the 2^nd ed. (1886) of Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Paul, H. ([1880] 1978). On sound change. In P. Baldi & R. N. Werth (Eds.) Readings in Historical Phonology: Chapters in the Theory of Sound Change. (pp. 3-22). University Park Philadelphia: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Long-term memory in speech perception: some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning. Speech Communication, 13, 109-125.10.1016/0167-6393(93)90063-QSearch in Google Scholar

Pisoni, D. B. (1997). Some thoughts on "normalization" in speech perception. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.) Talker Variability in Speech Processing. (pp. 9-32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pisoni, D. B. & Levi, S. V. (2007). Representations and representational specificity in speech perception and spoken word recognition. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 3-18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Port, R. & Leary, A. (2005). Against formal phonology. Language, 81, 927-964.10.1353/lan.2005.0195Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de (1959). Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de (1991). Kurs językoznawstwa ogólnego. 2nd edn. Translated by Krystyna Kasprzyk. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, K. N. (2005). Features in speech perception and lexical access. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp. 125-155). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Studdert- Kennedy, M. (1976). Speech perception. In N. J. Lass (Ed.) Contemporary Issues in Experimental Phonetics (pp. 243-293). New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Twaddell, W. F. (1952). Phonemes and allophones in speech analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 607-611.10.1121/1.1906941Search in Google Scholar

Wang, W. S. Y. (1978). Competing changes as a cause of residue. In P. Baldi & R. N. Werth (Eds.), Readings in Historical Phonology: Chapters in the Theory of Sound Change. (pp. 236-259). University Park Philadelphia: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. (pp. 95-195). Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar