Internally-driven change and feature correspondence in object representation: A key to children's essentialism?

Ahn, W., Gelman, S. A., Amsterlaw, J. A., Hohenstein, J., & Kalish, C. W. 2000). Causal status effect in children's categorization. Cognition, 76, B35-B43.Search in Google Scholar

Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 547-611.10.1017/S0140525X98001277Search in Google Scholar

Baillargeon, R. & Wang, S. (2002). Event categorization in infancy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 85-93.10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01836-2Search in Google Scholar

Bertenthal B. I. (1993). Perception of biomechanical motions by infants: intrinsic image and knowledge-based constraints. In C. Granrud (Ed.), Carnegie Symposium on Cognition: Visual Perception and Cognition in Infancy (pp. 175-214). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, R., Durgin, F., & Kaufman, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 150-184). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A. (1997). What does word use tell us about conceptual content? Psychology of Language and Communication, 1 (2), 5-16.Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K., Hartman, E., & Pappas, T. (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of parental input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Serial No. 253, Vol. 63, No. 1.10.2307/1166211Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991) Insides and essences: Early understandings of the nonobvious. Cognition, 38, 213-244.10.1016/0010-0277(91)90007-QSearch in Google Scholar

Gergely, G., Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Bíró, S. (1995) Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165-193.10.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-HSearch in Google Scholar

Hernik, M. & Haman, M. (2010, January). Fourteen-month-olds transfer sequences of features derived from internally-driven object transformation. Cognitive Development Center Opening Conference, Central European University, Budapest.Search in Google Scholar

Haman, M. (2009, June). Internally-driven object transformation enhances essentialist categorization. International Conference on Biological Understanding and Theory of Mind. Reims, France.Search in Google Scholar

Inagaki, K. & Hatano, G. (2002). Young Children's Thinking About the Biological World. New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Keil, F. C., Smith, W. C., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Two dogmas of conceptual empiricism: Implications for hybrid models of the structure of knowledge, Cognition, 65, 103-135.10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00041-3Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 174-219.10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-OSearch in Google Scholar

Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289Search in Google Scholar

Newman, G. E., Herrmann P., Wynn K., & Keil F. C. (2008). Biases towards internal features in infants' reasoning about objects. Cognition, 107, 420-432.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Opfer, J. E. & Siegler, R. S. (2004). Revisiting preschoolers living things concept: A microgenetic analysis of conceptual change in basic biology. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 301-332.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1929). The child's conception of the world. New York: Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Premack, D. & Premack A. J. (1995). Intention as psychological cause. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 185-199). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rakison, D. H. (2005). Developing knowledge of objects' motion properties in infancy Cognition, 96, 183-214.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Simons, D. J. & Keil, F. C. (1995). An abstract to concrete shift in the development of biological thought: The insides story. Cognition, 56, 129-163.10.1016/0010-0277(94)00660-DSearch in Google Scholar

Scholl, B. J. & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299-309.10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0Search in Google Scholar

Scholl, B. J. (2007). Object Persistence in Philosophy and Psychology. Mind & Language, 22, 563-591.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00321.xSearch in Google Scholar

Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29-56.10.1207/s15516709cog1401_3Search in Google Scholar

Tarlowski, A. (2006). If it's an animal it has axons: Experience and culture in pre-school children's reasoning about animates. Cognitive Development, 21, 249-265.10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Wang, S. & Baillargeon, R. (2007). Detecting impossible changes in infancy: A three-system account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 17-23.10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.012Search in Google Scholar

Woodward, A. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1-34.10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00058-4Search in Google Scholar