[Barnes FS, Greenebaum B. Biological and medical aspects of electromagnetic fields. Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Third edition. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis group, CRC Press; 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cameron IL, Short NJ, Markov MS. Safe alternative cancer therapy using electromagnetic fields The Environmentalist 2007; 27: 453-6.10.1007/s10669-007-9075-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Pope J. Medical physics: imaging. Portsmouth: Heinemann; 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[Adey WR. International encyclopedia of neuroscience. Third edition. New York: Elsevier; 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric field. EMBO J 1982; 1: 841-5.10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01257.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Neumann, E, Kakorin S, Tönsing K. Fundamentals of electroporative delivery of drugs and genes. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1999; 48: 3-16.10.1016/S0302-4598(99)00008-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Teissié J, Rols MP. An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization. Biophys J 1993; 65: 409-13.10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81052-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Kotnik T, Pucihar G, Rebersek M, Mir LM, Miklavcic D. Role of pulse shape in cell membrane electropermeabilization. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003; 1614: 193-200.10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00173-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Valic B, Golzio M, Pavlin M, Schatz A, Faurie C, Gabriel B, et al. Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment. Eur Biophys J 2003; 32: 519-28.10.1007/s00249-003-0296-912712266]Search in Google Scholar
[Miklavcic D, Towhidi L. Numerical study of the electroporation pulse shape effect on molecular uptake of biological cells. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 34-41.10.2478/v10019-010-0002-3342367222933889]Search in Google Scholar
[Faurie C, Golzio M, Phez E, Teissié J, Rols MP. Electric field induced cell membrane permeabilization and gene transfer: theory and experiments. Eng Life Sci 2005; 5: 179-86.10.1002/elsc.200420068]Search in Google Scholar
[Teissie J, Eynard N, Vernhes MC, Bénichou A, Ganeva V, Galutzov B, et al. Recent biotechnological developments of electropulsation. A prospective review. Bioelectrochem 2002; 55: 107-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sersa G, Miklavcic D, Cemazar M, Rudolf Z, Pucihar G, Snoj M. Electrochemotherapy in treatment of tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34: 232-40.10.1016/j.ejso.2007.05.01617614247]Search in Google Scholar
[Mir LM. Bases and rationale of the electrochemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Suppl 2006; 4: 38-44.10.1016/j.ejcsup.2006.08.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Miklavčič D, Snoj M, Županič A, Kos B, Čemažar M, Kropivnik M, et al. Towards treatment planning and treatment of deep-seated solid tumors by electrochemotherapy. Biomed Eng Online 2010; 9: 10.10.1186/1475-925X-9-10]Search in Google Scholar
[He J, Wang X, Guan H, Chen W, Wang M, Wu H, et al. Clinical efficacy of local targeted chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Radiol Oncol 2011; 45: 123-8.10.2478/v10019-011-0014-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiarella P, Fazio VM, Signori E. Application of electroporation in DNA vaccination protocols. Curr Gene Ther 2010; 10: 281-6.10.2174/156652310791823506]Search in Google Scholar
[Prud'homme GJ, Glinka Y, Khan AS, Draghia-Akli R. Electroporation-enhanced nonviral gene transfer for the prevention or treatment of immunological, endocrine and neoplastic diseases. Curr Gene Ther 2006; 6: 243-73.10.2174/156652306776359504]Search in Google Scholar
[Cemazar M, Golzio M, Sersa G, Rols MP, Teissié J. Electrically-assisted nucleic acids delivery to tissues in vivo: where do we stand? Curr Pharm Design 2006; 12: 3817-25.10.2174/138161206778559740]Search in Google Scholar
[Andre FM, Mir LM. Nucleic acids electrotransfer in vivo: mechanisms and practical aspects. Curr Gene Ther 2010; 10: 267-80.10.2174/156652310791823380]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavlin D, Cemazar M, Cör A, Sersa G, Pogacnik A, Tozon N. Electrogene therapy with interleukin-12 in canine mast cell tumors. Radiol Oncol 2011; 45: 30-9.10.2478/v10019-010-0041-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Böckmann RA, Groot BL, Kakorin S, Neumann E, Grubmüller H. Kinetics, statistics, and energetics of lipid membrane electroporation studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 2008; 95: 1837-50.10.1529/biophysj.108.129437]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosemberg Y, Korenstein R. Incorporation of macromolecules into cells and vesicles by low electric fields: induction of endocytotic-like process. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1997; 42: 275-81.10.1016/S0302-4598(96)05107-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Antov Y, Barbul A, Korenstein R. Electroendocytosis: stimulation of adsorptive and fluid-phase uptake by pulsed low electric fields. Exp Cell Res 2004; 297: 348-62.10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.03.02715212939]Search in Google Scholar
[Antov Y, Barbul A, Mantsur H, Korenstein R. Electroendocytosis: exposure of cells to pulsed low electric fields enhances adsorption and uptake of macromolecules. Biophys J 2005; 88: 2206-22.10.1529/biophysj.104.051268]Search in Google Scholar
[Mahrour N, Pologea-Moraru R, Moisescu MG, Orlowski S, Leveque P, Mir LM. In vitro increase of the fluid-phase endocytosis induced by pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: importance of the electric field component. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005; 1668: 126-37.10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.11.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Marszalek P, Tsong TY. Cell fission and formation of mini cell bodies by high frequency alternating electric field. Biophys J 1995; 68: 1218-21.10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80338-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 2000; 406: 147-50.10.1038/3501800010910346]Search in Google Scholar
[Sinclair C, Faulkner D, Hammond G. Flexible real-time control of MagStim 200(2) units for use in transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. J Neurosci Meth 2006; 158: 133-6.10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.05.02116824614]Search in Google Scholar
[Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini P, Pascual-Leone A. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophys 2009; 120: 2008-39.10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016326053619833552]Search in Google Scholar
[Jalinous R. Technical and practical aspects of magnetic nerve stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 8: 10-25.10.1097/00004691-199101000-000042019644]Search in Google Scholar
[Roth y, Zangen A, Hallett M. A coil design for transcranial magnetic stimulation of deep brain regions. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 19: 361-70.10.1097/00004691-200208000-0000812436090]Search in Google Scholar
[Ravazzani P, Ruohonen J, Grandori F, Tognola G. Magnetic stimulation of the nervous system: induced electric field in unbounded, semi-infinite, spherical, and cylindrical media. Ann Biomed Eng 1996; 24: 606-16.10.1007/BF026842298886241]Search in Google Scholar
[Salinas FS, Lancaster JL, Fox PT. Detailed 3D models of the induced electric field of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 2879-92.10.1088/0031-9155/52/10/01617473357]Search in Google Scholar
[Macek-Lebar A, Sersa G, Kranjc S, Groselj A, Miklavcic D. Optimisation of pulse parameters in vitro for in vivo electrochemotherapy. Anticancer Res 2002; 22: 1731-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Towhidi L, Kotnik T, Pucihar G, Firoozabadi SMP, Mozdarani H, Miklavcic D. Variability of the minimal transmembrane voltage resulting in detectable membrane electroporation. Electromagn Biol Med 2008; 27: 372-85.10.1080/15368370802394644]Search in Google Scholar
[Marjanovič I, Haberl S, Miklavčič D, Kandušer M, Pavlin M. Analysis and comparison of electrical pulse parameters for gene electrotransfer of two different cell lines. J Membrane Bio 2010; 236: 97-105.10.1007/s00232-010-9282-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Usaj M, Torkar D, Kanduser Mm Miklavcic D. Cell counting tool parameters optimization approach for electroporation efficiency determination of attached cells in phase contrast images. J Microscopy 2011; 241: 303-14.10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03441.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart WW. Functional connexions between cells as revealed by dye coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalamide tracer. Cell 1978; 14: 741-59.10.1016/0092-8674(78)90256-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart WW. Lucifer dyes highly fluorescent dyes for biological tracing. Nature 1981; 292: 17-21.10.1038/292017a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Puc M, Kotnik T, Mir LM, Miklavčič D. Quantitative model of small molecules uptake after in vitro cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry 2003; 60: 1-10.10.1016/S1567-5394(03)00021-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Pucihar G, Kotnik T, Kanduser M, Miklavcic D. The influence of medium conductivity on electropermeabilization and survival of cells in vitro. Bioelectrochemistry 2001; 54: 107-15.10.1016/S1567-5394(01)00117-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Kotnik T, Pucihar G, Miklavčič D. Induced transmembrane voltage and its correlation with electroporation-mediated molecular transport. J Membrane Biol 2010; 236: 3-13.10.1007/s00232-010-9279-920617432]Search in Google Scholar
[Pucihar G, Krmelj J, Reberšek M, Batista Napotnik T, Miklavčič D. Equivalent pulse parameters for electroporation. IEEE T Biomed Eng 2011; 58: 3279-88.10.1109/TBME.2011.216723221900067]Search in Google Scholar
[Rols MP, Femenia P, Teissié J. Long-lived macropinocytosis takes place in electropermeabilized mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995; 208: 26-38.10.1006/bbrc.1995.13007887937]Search in Google Scholar
[Zimmermann U, Schnettler R, Klöck G, Watzka H, Donath E, Glaser RW. Mechanisms of electrostimulated uptake of macromolecules into living cells. Naturwissenschaften 1990; 77: 543-5.10.1007/BF01139269]Search in Google Scholar
[Glogauer M, Lee W, McCulloch CA. Induced endocytosis in human fibroblasts by electrical fields. Exp Cell Res 1993; 208: 232-40.10.1006/excr.1993.1242]Search in Google Scholar
[Escoffre JM, Dean DS, Hubert M. Rols MP, Favard C. Membrane perturbation by an external electric field: a mechanism to permit molecular uptake. Eur Biophys J 2007; 36: 973-83.10.1007/s00249-007-0194-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Timothy EV, Weaver JC. Molecular change due to biomagnetic stimulation and transient magnetic fields: mechanical interference constraints on possible effects by cell membrane pore creation via magnetic particles. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1998; 46: 121-8.10.1016/S0302-4598(98)00096-8]Search in Google Scholar