The influence of low temperatures on dynamic mechanical properties of animal bone

Akkus O, Belaney RM, Das P. Free radical scavenging alleviates the biomechanical impairment of gamma radiation sterilized bone tissue. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23(4): 838-45.10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.00716022998Search in Google Scholar

Andrade MG, Sa CN, Marchionni AM, de Bittencourt TC, Sadigursky M. Effects of freezing on bone histological morphology. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008. (Epub)10.1007/s10561-008-9065-418320353Search in Google Scholar

Balsly CR, Cotter AT, Williams LA, Gaskins BD, Moore MA, Wolfinbarger L Jr. Effect of low dose and moderate dose gamma irradiation on the mechanical properties of bone and soft tissue allografts. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008. (Epub)10.1007/s10561-008-9069-018431690Search in Google Scholar

Butler AM, Morgan DA, Verheul R, Walsh WR. Mechanical properties of gamma irradiated morselized bone during compaction. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(30): 6009-13.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.00715958242Search in Google Scholar

Cornu O, Bavadekar A, Godts B, Van Tomme J, Delloye C, Banse X. Impaction bone grafting with freeze-dried irradiated bone. Part II. Changes in stiffness and compactness of morselized grafts: experiments in cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003; 74(5): 553-8.10.1080/0001647031001794714620975Search in Google Scholar

Frankel V. The femoral neck. Uppsala, Almguist and Wiksell, 1960.Search in Google Scholar

Grieb TA, Forng RY, Stafford RE, Lin J, Almeida J, Bogdansky S, Ronholdt C, Drohan WN, Burgess WH. Effective use of optimized, high-dose (50 kGy) gamma irradiation for pathogen inactivation of human bone allografts. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(14): 2033-42.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.02815576177Search in Google Scholar

Hamer AJ, Stockley I, Elson RA. Changes in allograft bone irradiated at different temperatures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81(2): 342-4.10.1302/0301-620X.81B2.0810342Search in Google Scholar

Kang JS, Kim NH. The biomechanical properties of deep freezing and freeze drying bones and their biomechanical changes after in-vivo allograft. Yonsei Med J. 1995; 36(4): 332-5.10.3349/ymj.1995.36.4.3327483676Search in Google Scholar

Komender A. Influence of preservation on some mechanical properties of human haversian bone. Mater Med Pol. 1976; 8: 13.Search in Google Scholar

Kubisz L, Mielcarek S, Biskupski P, Mardas M. Dynamic mechanical properties of gamma sterilized Animals compact bone. Pol J Environ Stud. 2006; 15(4A): 72-74.Search in Google Scholar

Malinin T, Temple HT. Comparison of frozen and freeze-dried particulate bone allografts. Cryobiology. 2007; 55(2): 167-70.10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.05.00717658506Search in Google Scholar

Menard KP. Dynamic mechanical analysis: a practical introduction. CRC Press. 1999.10.1201/9781420049183Search in Google Scholar

Moreno J, Forriol F. Effects of preservation on the mechanical strength and chemical composition of cortical bone: an experimental study in sheep femora. Biomaterials. 2002; 23(12): 2615-9.10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00402-1Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen H, Morgan DA, Forwood MR. Sterilization of allograft bone: is 25 kGy the gold standard for gamma irradiation? Cell Tissue Bank. 2007; 8(2): 81-91.10.1007/s10561-006-9019-7Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen H, Morgan DA, Forwood MR. Sterilization of allograft bone: effects of gamma irradiation on allograft biology and biomechanics. Cell Tissue Bank. 2007; 8(2): 93-105.10.1007/s10561-006-9020-1Search in Google Scholar

Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE, Markham TC. Biomechanical properties of bone allografts. Clin Orthop. 1983; 174: 54-57.10.1097/00003086-198304000-00009Search in Google Scholar

Pelker R, Markham T, Friedlaender G, Moen C, Panjabi M. The effect of preservation on allograft strength. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1982; 7: 283.Search in Google Scholar

Sedin E. A rheologic model for cortical bone. Acta Orthop Scand. 1965; 36 Suppl: 83.10.3109/ort.1965.36.suppl-83.01Search in Google Scholar

Yamashita J, Furman BR, Rawls R, Wang X, Agrawal CM. The use of dynamic mechanical analysis to asses the viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 58: 47-53.10.1002/1097-4636(2001)58:1<47::AID-JBM70>3.0.CO;2-USearch in Google Scholar