1. bookVolume 22 (2021): Issue 3 (June 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

A Digital or Sustainable Small and Medium-Sized Port? Sustainable Port Blueprint in the Baltic Sea Region Based on Port Benchmarking

Published Online: 22 Jun 2021
Page range: 332 - 342
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Small and medium-sized ports (SMSPs) in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR) are caught in a dilemma of less financial support by the European funding programmes due to their peripheral position in the TEN-T Core Network. Most of the BSR ports belong to the TEN-T Comprehensive Network, which is rationally less important in the topical financial, infrastructural and policy discourses. Despite this, BSR ports are of a colossal importance for the regional economic development serving as gateways for the individual regions and drivers of socio-economic and environmental transition. In addition, ports are essential in pursuing new innovation avenues. The environmental targets published by the European Commission for maritime sector in 2030 and 2050 are applicable for SMSPs as well, creating further obstacles and future challenges on the one hand, but opening new horizons to grow and innovate on the other one. A successful environmental and digital transformation going hand in hand in SMSPs enable sustainable boost of sustainable development. Thus, as a first step, the assessment of sustainable readiness in SMSPs is incumbent in order to implement tailor-made solutions on individual basis, by ensuring efficient usage of available resources and capabilities. In line with the Connect2SmallPorts project, part-financed by the INTERREG South Baltic Programme, 38 SMSPs in the BSR were approached to mapping their digital readiness according to the methodology of the Digital Readiness Index for Ports (DRIP), published within the project in 2020. Building upon this, this paper introduces the idea of digital and environmental twinning to conclude on sustainable development potentials in SMSPs with an adaptation of the DRIP score. Hence, the research contributes to the sustainable port concept and illustrates the positioning of SMSPs in the progress of sustainable development.

Keywords

1. Acciaro, M. (2015) Corporate responsibility and value creation in the port sector. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 18(3), 291-311. Search in Google Scholar

2. Alamoush, A. S., Ballini, F., & Dalaklis, D. (2021) Port sustainable supply chain management framework: Contributing to the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Maritime Technology and Research, 3(2), 137-161. Search in Google Scholar

3. Ansorena, I. L. (2021) On the benchmarking of port performance. A cosine similarity approach. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 11(1), 101-114. Search in Google Scholar

4. Arof, A. M., Zakaria, A., & Rahman, N. S. F. A. (2021) Green Port Indicators: A Review. Advanced Engineering for Processes and Technologies II, 237-256. Search in Google Scholar

5. Asgari, N., Hassani, A., Jones, D., & Nguye, H. H. (2015) Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports: Methodology and case study. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 78, 19-39. Search in Google Scholar

6. Ashrafi, M., Walker, T. R., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Acciaro, M. (2020) A review of corporate sustainability drivers in maritime ports: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(8), 1027-1044. Search in Google Scholar

7. Baltic Ports Organisation (2021) Comprehensive ports in the Baltic Sea – an important role for Short Sea Shipping, people mobility, industries and blue economy. Search in Google Scholar

8. Baranova, N. M., & Sorokin, L. V. (2017) An impact of human capital on the sustainable economic development. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 16(12), 2224-2237. Search in Google Scholar

9. Bjerkan, K. Y., & Ryghaug, M. (2021) Diverging pathways to port sustainability: How social processes shape and direct transition work. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120595. Search in Google Scholar

10. Bjerkan, K. Y., & Seter, H. (2019) Reviewing tools and technologies for sustainable ports: Does research enable decision making in ports? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 72, 243-260. Search in Google Scholar

11. Castellano, R., Ferretti, M., Musella, G., & Risitano, M. (2020) Evaluating the economic and environmental efficiency of ports: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122560. Search in Google Scholar

12. Chatti, M. A. (2012) Knowledge management: a personal knowledge network perspective. Journal of knowledge management. Search in Google Scholar

13. Chen, Y. Z., Zhou, L. C., Zhou, Y. X., Shen, R. C., Wenzhou, E. E. I., & Quarantine, B. (2017) Analysis on the core capacity building of different kinds of ports. Chinese Journal of Frontier Health and Quarantine, 02. Search in Google Scholar

14. Cheon, S. (2017) The economic-social performance relationships of ports: Roles of stakeholders and organizational tension. Sustainable Development, 25(1), 50-62. doi:10.1002/sd.1641 Search in Google Scholar

15. Cheon, S., Maltz, A., & Dooley, K. (2017) The link between economic and environmental performance of the top 10 US ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 44(2), 227-247. Search in Google Scholar

16. Clarke, A., & Manton, S. (1997) A benchmarking tool for change management. Business Process Management Journal. Search in Google Scholar

17. Damman, S., & Steen, M. (2021) A socio-technical perspective on the scope for ports to enable energy transition. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 91, 102691. Search in Google Scholar

18. De Azevedo, A. R., Alexandre, J., Xavier, G. D. C., & Pedroti, L. G. (2018) Recycling paper industry effluent sludge for use in mortars: a sustainability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 335-346. Search in Google Scholar

19. De Jong, J. (2020) Servitization in the Shipbuilding Industry: A research into the relation of user profiles and service contracts of high-speed transport vessels. Search in Google Scholar

20. Denktas-Sakar, G., & Karatas-Cetin, C. (2012) Port sustainability and stakeholder management in supply chains: A framework on resource dependence theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(3), 301-319. Search in Google Scholar

21. Di Vaio, A., Varriale, L., & Alvino, F., (2018) Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy. Energy Policy, 122, 229-240. Search in Google Scholar

22. Drobetz, W., Merikas, A., Merika, A., & Tsionas, M. G. (2014) Corporate social responsibility disclosure: The case of international shipping. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 71, 18-44. Search in Google Scholar

23. Durán, C., Palominos, F., Carrasco, R., & Carrillo, E. (2021) Influence of Strategic Interrelationships and Decision-Making in Chilean Port Networks on Their Degree of Sustainability. Sustainability, 13(7), 3959. Search in Google Scholar

24. Elkington, J. (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: Win–win–win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100. Search in Google Scholar

25. Elzarka, S., & Elgazzar, S. (2014) Green port performance index for sustainable ports in Egypt: a fuzzy AHP approach. In: International Forum on Shipping, Ports and Airports (IFSPA) 2014: Sustainable Development in Shipping and Transport Logistics. Search in Google Scholar

26. European Commission (2013) Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU. Official Journal of the European Union, 1-128. Search in Google Scholar

27. European Commission (2014) List of Seaports in the Core and Comprehensive Network. Search in Google Scholar

28. Farazmand, A. (2004) Innovation in Strategic Human Resource Management: Building Capacity in the Age of Globalization. Public Organization Review, 4, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000015649.54219.b7 Search in Google Scholar

29. Feng, L., & Notteboom, T. (2013) Peripheral challenge by small and medium sized ports (SMSPs) in multi-port gateway regions: the case study of northeast of China. Polish Maritime Research, 20(Special-Issue), 55-66. Search in Google Scholar

30. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 80-92. Search in Google Scholar

31. Geerts, M., Dooms, M., & Stas, L. (2021) Determinants of Sustainability Reporting in the Present Institutional Context: The Case of Port Managing Bodies. Sustainability, 13(6), 3148. Search in Google Scholar

32. Geigenmüller, A. (2010) The role of virtual trade fairs in relationship value creation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. Search in Google Scholar

33. Gerlitz, L., & Meyer, C. (2021) Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems. Sustainability, 13(8), 4386. Search in Google Scholar

34. Hill, M., Mann, L., & Wearing, A. J. (1996) The effects of attitude, subjective norm and self-efficacy on intention to benchmark: a comparison between managers with experience and no experience in benchmarking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(4), 313-327. Search in Google Scholar

35. Horlings, I., & Padt, F. (2013) Leadership for sustainable regional development in rural areas: Bridging personal and institutional aspects. Sustainable Development, 21(6), 413-424. Search in Google Scholar

36. Hossain, T., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2021) Role of sustainability in global seaports. Ocean & Coastal Management, 202, 105435. Search in Google Scholar

37. Hua, C., Chen, J., Wan, Z., Xu, L., Bai, Y., Zheng, T., & Fei, Y. (2020) Evaluation and governance of green development practice of port: A sea port case of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119434. Search in Google Scholar

38. Jepson Jr, E. J. (2001) Sustainability and planning: Diverse concepts and close associations. Journal of planning literature, 15(4), 499-510. Search in Google Scholar

39. Karaś, A. (2020) Smart port as a key to the future development of modern ports. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 14(1). Search in Google Scholar

40. Koberg, E., & Longoni, A. (2019) A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 1084-1098. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.033 Search in Google Scholar

41. Kong, Y., & Liu, J. (2021) Sustainable port cities with coupling coordination and environmental efficiency. Ocean & Coastal Management, 205, 105534. Search in Google Scholar

42. Kuznetsov, A., Dinwoodie, J., Gibbs, D., Sansom, M., & Knowles, H. (2015) Towards a sustainability management system for smaller ports. Marine Policy, 54, 59-68. Search in Google Scholar

43. Lalla-Ruiz, E., Heilig, L., & Voß, S. (2019) Environmental sustainability in ports. In: Sustainable transportation and smart logistics, 65-89. Elsevier. Search in Google Scholar

44. Lawer, E. T., Herbeck, J., & Flitner, M. (2019) Selective adoption: How port authorities in Europe and West Africa Engage with the globalizing ‘Green Port’idea. Sustainability, 11(18), 5119. Search in Google Scholar

45. Laxe, F. G., Berm dez, F. M., Palmero, F. M., & Novo-Corti, I. (2017) Assessment of port sustainability through synthetic indexes: Application to the Spanish case. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 119(1), 220-225 Search in Google Scholar

46. Lee, Y. C. (2017) Corporate sustainable development and marketing communications on social media: Fortune 500 enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 569-583. Search in Google Scholar

47. Lim, S., Pettit, S., Abouarghoub, W., & Beresford, A. (2019) Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 72, 47-64. Search in Google Scholar

48. Lirn, T. C., Wu, Y. C. J., & Chen, Y. J. (2013) Green performance criteria for sustainable ports in Asia. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. Search in Google Scholar

49. López-Morales, J. S., Huerta-Estévez, A., Andrade-Estrada, M. G., & Zarrabal-Gutiérrez, C. G. (2020) Corporate social responsibility in ports of Latin America. Marine Economics and Management. Search in Google Scholar

50. Lu, C. S., Lai, P. L., & Chiang, Y. P. (2016) Container terminal employees’ perceptions of the effects of sustainable supply chain management on sustainability performance. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(5), 597-613. Search in Google Scholar

51. Lu, W., Park, S. H., Oh, J. G., & Yeo, G. T. (2018) Network connection strategy for Small and Medium-sized Ports (SMSPs). The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(1), 19-26. Search in Google Scholar

52. Meletiou, M., & Law, L. (2006) Improved port performance through training: The contribution of the International Labour Organization. In: 22nd International Port Conference. Human Resources and Sea Ports Performance, 12-14. Search in Google Scholar

53. Meyer, C., Gerlitz, L., & Henesey, L. (2021) Cross-Border Capacity Building for Port Ecosystems in Small and Medium-Sized Ports. Journal of European Studies, 11 (1), 33. Search in Google Scholar

54. Molavi, A., Lim, G. J., & Race, B. (2020a) A framework for building a smart port and smart port index. International journal of sustainable transportation, 14(9), 686-700. Search in Google Scholar

55. Molavi, A., Shi, J., Wu, Y., & Lim, G. J. (2020b) Enabling smart ports through the integration of microgrids: A two-stage stochastic programming approach. Applied Energy, 258, 114022. Search in Google Scholar

56. Mortensen, L., Kørnøv, L., Lyhne, I., & Raakjær, J. (2020) Smaller ports’ evolution towards catalysing sustainable hinterland development. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(3), 402-418. Search in Google Scholar

57. Munim, Z. H., Sornn-Friese, H., & Dushenko, M. (2020) Identifying the appropriate governance model for green port management: Applying Analytic Network Process and Best-Worst methods to ports in the Indian Ocean Rim. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122156. Search in Google Scholar

58. Nitsenko, V. S., Nyenno, I. M., Kryukova, I., Kalyna, T., & Plotnikova, M. (2017) Business model for a sea commercial port as a way to reach sustainable development goals. Search in Google Scholar

59. Notteboom, T. E. (2005) The peripheral port challenge in container port systems. International maritime transport: perspectives, 173-188. Search in Google Scholar

60. Notteboom, T. E. (2010) Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: an update. Journal of transport geography, 18(4), 567-583. Search in Google Scholar

61. Notteboom, T., Lugt, L. V. D., Saase, N. V., Sel, S., & Neyens, K. (2020) The role of seaports in green supply chain management: Initiatives, attitudes, and perspectives in Rotterdam, Antwerp, North Sea Port, and Zeebrugge. Sustainability, 12(4), 1688. Search in Google Scholar

62. Pantano, E., & Vannucci, V. (2019) Who is innovating? An exploratory research of digital technologies diffusion in retail industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 297-304. Search in Google Scholar

63. Park, Y. S., Mohamed Abdul Ghani, N. M. A., Gebremikael, F., & Egilmez, G. (2019) Benchmarking environmental efficiency of ports using data mining and RDEA: the case of a US container ports. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 22(2), 172-187. Search in Google Scholar

64. Parola, F., Risitano, M., Ferretti, M., & Panetti, E. (2017) The drivers of port competitiveness: a critical review. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 116-138. Search in Google Scholar

65. Philipp, R. (2020) Digital readiness index assessment towards smart port development. In: Sustainability Management Forum, Nachhaltigkeits Management Forum, 28, 49-60. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Search in Google Scholar

66. Philipp, R., Gerlitz, L., Moldabekova, A. (2020) Small and medium-sized seaports on the digital track: tracing digitalization across the south Baltic region by innovative auditing procedures. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O. (eds) Relstat 2019. Lecture notes in network and systems, 117. Springer, Cham, pp. 351 – 362. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0081 Search in Google Scholar

67. Port Technology. (2016) What is a Smart Port? Retrieved from https://www.porttechnology.org/news/what_is_a_smart_port/ (Accessed: 11.05.2021). Search in Google Scholar

68. Prašnikar, J., Debeljak, Ž., & Ahčan, A. (2005) Benchmarking as a tool of strategic management. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 16(2), 257-275. Search in Google Scholar

69. Puig, M., Raptis, S., Wooldridge, C., & Darbra, R. M. (2020) Performance trends of environmental management in European ports. Marine pollution bulletin, 160, 111686. Search in Google Scholar

70. Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., Michail, A., & Darbra, R. M. (2015) Current status and trends of the environmental performance in European ports. Environmental Science & Policy, 48, 57-66. Search in Google Scholar

71. Robinson, R. (1998) Asian hub/feeder nets: the dynamics of restructuring. Maritime Pol. Management, 25 (1), 21–40. 931 Search in Google Scholar

72. Saadat, V., & Saadat, Z. (2016) Organizational learning as a key role of organizational success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 219-225. Search in Google Scholar

73. Sadek, I., & Elgohary, M. (2020) Assessment of renewable energy supply for green ports with a case study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(5), 5547-5558. Search in Google Scholar

74. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008) Core issues in sustainable supply chain management–a Delphi study. Business strategy and the environment, 17(8), 455-466. Search in Google Scholar

75. Shields, P. M., & Rangarajan, N. (2013) A playbook for research methods: Integrating conceptual frameworks and project management. New Forums Press. Search in Google Scholar

76. Siemieniako, D., & Gębarowski, M. (2017) B2B trade fairs and promise management as a relationship marketing concept. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 16(3), 237-261. Search in Google Scholar

77. Sislian, L., Jaegler, A., & Cariou, P. (2016) A literature review on port sustainability and ocean’s carrier network problem. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, 19-26. Search in Google Scholar

78. Stein, M., & Acciaro, M. (2020) Value Creation through Corporate Sustainability in the Port Sector: A Structured Literature Analysis. Sustainability, 12(14), 5504. Search in Google Scholar

79. Stoddart, H., Schneeberger, K., Dodds, F., Shaw, A., Bottero, M., Cornforth, J., & White, R. (2011) A pocket guide to sustainable development governance. Stakeholder Forum 2011. Search in Google Scholar

80. Teerawattana, R., & Yang, Y. C. (2019) Environmental performance indicators for green port policy evaluation: case study of Laem Chabang port. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 35(1), 63-69. Search in Google Scholar

81. Thomas, D. R. (2003) A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. Search in Google Scholar

82. Thomas, D. R. (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation, 27(2), 237-246. Search in Google Scholar

83. Unctad (2014) Review of Maritime Transport 2014. Search in Google Scholar

84. Vejvar, M., Lai, K. H., Lo, C. K., & Fürst, E. W. (2018) Strategic responses to institutional forces pressuring sustainability practice adoption: Case-based evidence from inland port operations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 61, 274-288. Search in Google Scholar

85. Wakeman, R. (1996) What is a sustainable port? The relationship between ports and their regions. Journal of Urban Technology, 3(2), 65-79. Search in Google Scholar

86. Wang, X., Yuen, K. F., Wong, Y. D., & Li, K. X. (2020) How can the maritime industry meet Sustainable Development Goals? An analysis of sustainability reports from the social entrepreneurship perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78, 102173. Search in Google Scholar

87. WCED, S. W. S. (1987) World commission on environment and development. Our common future, 17(1), 1-91. Search in Google Scholar

88. Yang, Y., Xue, X., Gao, Y., Zhang, H., & Du, X. (2020) Constructing Sustainable Coastal Ecological Environment: A Hierarchical Structure for Sustainable Smart Ports. Journal of Coastal Research, 99(SI), 358-363. Search in Google Scholar

89. Yang, Y., Zhong, M., Yao, H., Yu, F., Fu, Y. & Postolache, O. (2018) Internet of Things for small ports: Technologies and challenges. IEEE Instrumentatino & measurement Magazine, 21(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2018.8278808 Search in Google Scholar

90. Yazan, B. (2015) Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. Qual. Rep., 20, 134–152. Search in Google Scholar

91. Yau, K. L. A., Peng, S., Qadir, J., Low, Y. C., & Ling, M. H. (2020) Towards Smart Port Infrastructures: Enhancing Port Activities Using Information and Communications Technology. IEEE Access, 8, 83387-83404. Search in Google Scholar

92. Yin, R.K. (2018) Case Study Research and Applications; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. Search in Google Scholar

93. Zelenika, I., & Pearce, J. M. (2013) The Internet and other ICTs as tools and catalysts for sustainable development: innovation for 21st century. Information Development, 29(3), 217-232. Search in Google Scholar

94. Zhou, C., Xu, J., Miller-Hooks, E., Zhou, W., Chen, C. H., Lee, L. H., ... & Li, H. (2021) Analytics with digital-twinning: A decision support system for maintaining a resilient port. Decision Support Systems, 143, 113496. Search in Google Scholar

95. Zhu, Q., Krikke, H., & Caniels, M. C. (2018) Supply chain integration: value creation through managing inter-organizational learning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo