1. bookVolume 21 (2020): Issue 3 (June 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1407-6179
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

QoS to QoE Mapping Function for Iptv Quality Assessement Based on Kohonen Map: A Pilot Study

Published Online: 25 Jun 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 21 (2020) - Issue 3 (June 2020)
Page range: 181 - 190
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1407-6179
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

1. Akhtar, Z., Siddique, K., Rattani, A., Lutfi S.L., Falk, T.H. (2019) Why is Multimedia Quality of Experience Assessment a Challenging Problem? IEEE Access, 7, pp. 117897-117915.Search in Google Scholar

2. Anegekuh, L., Sun, L., Jammeh, E., Mkwawa, I., Ifeachor, E. (2015) Content-Based Video Quality Prediction for HEVC Encoded Videos Streamed Over Packet Networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 17(8), pp. 1323-1334.10.1109/TMM.2015.2444098Search in Google Scholar

3. Bampis, C.G., Li Z., Bovik, A.C. (2019) Spatiotemporal Feature Integration and Model Fusion for Full Reference Video Quality Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 29(8), pp. 2256-2270.10.1109/TCSVT.2018.2868262Search in Google Scholar

4. Blazekova, O., Vojtekova. M. (2019) Using of Parallel Coordinates in Finding Minimum Distance in Time-Space. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 21(3), pp. 3-7.10.26552/com.C.2019.3.3-7Search in Google Scholar

5. Carvalho, F.D.T., Bertrand, P., Simoes, E.C. (2016) Batch SOM algorithms for interval-valued data with automatic weighting of the variables. Neurocomputing, vol. 182, pp. 66-81.10.1016/j.neucom.2015.11.084Search in Google Scholar

6. Cheng, Z., Ding, L., Huang, W., Yang, F., Qian, L. (2017) A unified QoE prediction framework for HEVC encoded video streaming over wireless networks. IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB), pp. 1-6.10.1109/BMSB.2017.7986156Search in Google Scholar

7. Dybskaya, V. V., Sverchkov, P. A. (2017) Designing a Rational Distribution Network for Trading Companies. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 18(3), pp. 181-193.10.1515/ttj-2017-0016Search in Google Scholar

8. Frnda, J., Nedoma, J., Vanus, J., Martinek, R. (2019) A Hybrid QoS-QoE Estimation System for IPTV Service. Electronics, 8(5), 585.10.3390/electronics8050585Search in Google Scholar

9. Gu, K., Tao, D., Qiao J., Lin, W. (2018) Learning a No-Reference Quality Assessment Model of Enhanced Images With Big Data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(4), pp. 1301-1313.10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2649101Search in Google Scholar

10. International Telecommunications Union, ITU-T P.910. (2008) Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications.Search in Google Scholar

11. International Telecommunications Union, ITU-T P.913. (2016) Methods for the subjective assessment of video quality, audio quality and audiovisual quality of Internet video and distribution quality television in any environment.Search in Google Scholar

12. Kohonen, T. (1998) The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing, 21, pp. 1-6.10.1016/S0925-2312(98)00030-7Search in Google Scholar

13. Loh, W., Bong, D.B.L. (2018) A Just Noticeable Difference-Based Video Quality Assessment Method with Low Computational Complexity. Sensing and Imaging, 19, Article number: 33.10.1007/s11220-018-0216-9Search in Google Scholar

14. Loktev, Daniil A., Loktev, Alexey A., Salnikova, Alexandra V., Shaforostova, Anna A. (2019) Determination of the Dynamic Vehicle Model Parameters by Means of Computer Vision. Communications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina, 21(3), pp. 28-34.10.26552/com.C.2019.3.28-34Search in Google Scholar

15. Mocanu, D.C., Pokhrel, J., Pablo Garella, J., Seppänen, J., Liotou, E., Narwaria, M. (2015) No-reference video quality measurement: added value of machine learning. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 24(6).10.1117/1.JEI.24.6.061208Search in Google Scholar

16. Mohamed, S., Rubino, G. (2002) A Study of Real-Time Packet Video Quality Using Random Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 12(12).10.1109/TCSVT.2002.806808Search in Google Scholar

17. Mustafa, S., Hameed, A. (2019) Perceptual quality assessment of video using machine learning algorithm. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 13, pp. 1495–1502.10.1007/s11760-019-01494-5Search in Google Scholar

18. Ramirez-Alonso, G., Chacon-Murguia, M.I. (2016) Object detection in video sequences by a temporal modular self-adaptive SOM. Neural Computing & Applications, 27, pp. 411-430.10.1007/s00521-015-1859-2Search in Google Scholar

19. Sevcik, L., Voznak, M., Frnda, J. (2014) QoE Prediction Model for Multimedia Services in IP Network Applying Queuing Policy. In: 17th International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (SPECTS) part of SummerSim Multiconference, pp. 593-598.10.1109/SPECTS.2014.6879998Search in Google Scholar

20. Søgaard, J., Forchhammer, S., Korhonen, J. (2015) Video quality assessment and machine learning: Performance and interpretability. In: 7th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).10.1109/QoMEX.2015.7148149Search in Google Scholar

21. Song, L., Tang, X., Zhang, W., Yang, X., Xia, P. (2013) The SJTU 4K video sequence dataset. In: 5th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).10.1109/QoMEX.2013.6603201Search in Google Scholar

22. Valderrama, D., Gómez, N. (2016) Nonintrusive Method Based on Neural Networks for Video Quality of Experience Assessment. Advances in Multimedia, volume 2016.10.1155/2016/1730814Search in Google Scholar

23. Yuana, Y., Wang, C. (2019) IPTV video quality assessment model based on neural network. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 64, 102629.10.1016/j.jvcir.2019.102629Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo