[
1. Barinova S., 2017a – Essential and practical bioindication methods and systems for the water quality assessment, International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 2, 3, 555588, doi: 10.19080/IJESNR.2017.02.555588.10.19080/IJESNR.2017.02.555588
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Barinova S., 2017b – On the classification of water quality from an ecological point of view, International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 2, 2, 1-8, doi:10.19080/IJESNR.2017.02.555581.10.19080/IJESNR.2017.02.555581
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Barinova S. and Fahima T., 2017 – The development of the a world database of freshwater algae-indicators, Journal of Environment and Ecology, 8, 1, 1-7. http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jee/article/view/11228/8981.10.5296/jee.v8i1.11228
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Barinova S. S., Bilous O. P. and Tsarenko P. M., 2019 – Algal indication of water bodies in Ukraine: methods and prospects, Haifa, Kyiv, Publishing House of Haifa University, Israel, 367, https://www.academia.edu/38842519/Algal_indication_of_water_bodies_in_Ukraine_methods_and_perspectives. (in Russian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Barinova S. S., Medvedeva L. A. and Anissimova O. V., 2006 – Diversity of algal indicators in environmental assessment, Tel Aviv, Pilies Studio Publisher, Israel, 498, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265251122_Diversity_of_Algal_Indicators_in_Environmental_Assessment. (in Russian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Becker R., Doege A., Schubert H. and van de Weyer K., 2016 – Bioindikation mit Characeen, in Arbeitsgruppe Characeen Deutschlands Lehrstuhl für Ökologie der Universität, Edit. Armleuchteralgen, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Spektrum, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47797-7_8. (in German) [3]10.1007/978-3-662-47797-7_8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Cavalier-Smith T., 1998 – A revised six-kingdom system of life, Biological Review, 73, 3, 203-66, doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00030.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Cavalier-Smith T. and Chao E. E.-Y., 2006 – Phylogeny and megasystematics of phagotrophic heterokonts (kingdom Chromista), Journal of Molecular Evolution, 62, 388-420, http://www.springerlink.com/content/t5w324231345611g/.10.1007/s00239-004-0353-816557340
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Jäger D., 2010 – Exemplare des Formenkreises Chara denudata A. Braun 1847 und Chara dissoluta A. Braun ex Leonhardi 1864 aus dem Bodensee, Rostock, Meeresbiolog, Beitr., 23, 29-39. (in German) [7]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. European Parliament, 2000 ‒ Directive 2000/60/EC of European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, OJL, 327, 1-72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Fennessy S., Gernes M., Mack J. and Waldrop D. H., 2001 – Methods for evaluating wetland condition: using vegetation to assess environmental conditions in wetlands, EPA 822-R-01-007j, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D. C., USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Friedrich G., Chapman D. and Beim A. 1996 – The use of biological material, Chapter 5, in Chapman D. (ed.), Water Quality Assessments – A guide to use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring, 2nd edition, UNESCO/WHO/UNEP, London E. and Spon F. N., 626, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41850.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. GBIF, Global Biodiversity Information Facility, https://www.gbif.org/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Guiry M. D. and Guiry G. M., 2021 – AlgaeBase, World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway, http://www.algaebase.org (assessed on 15 July 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Haury J., Peltre M.-C., Trémolières M., Barbe J., Thiébaut G., Bernez I., Daniel H., Chatenet P., Haan-Archipof G., Muller S., Dutartre A., Laplace-Treyture C., Cazaubon A. and Lambert- Servien E., 2006 – A new method to assess water trophy and organic pollution – the Macrophyte Biological Index for Rivers (IBMR): its application to different types of river and pollution, Hydrobiologia, 570, 153-158, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0175-3. [8]10.1007/s10750-006-0175-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Hering D., Johnson R. K., Kramm S., Schmutz S., Szoszkiewicz K. and Verdonscot P. F. M., 2006 – Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress, Freshwater Biology 51, 1757-1785, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01610.x.10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01610.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Kent D. M., 2000 – Evaluating wetland functions and values, Chapter 3, in Applied wetlands science and technology, Kent D. M., (ed.), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, U.S.A., 55-80.10.1201/9781420032956.ch3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Marvan P., Maršálek B., Heteša J., Sukačova K., Maršálková E., Geriš R. and Kozáková M., 2005 – Comments on the revised tables of algal (and other botanical) water quality indicators listed in CSN 75 7716 – discussion material for assessment of trophic status of water bodies, Association Flos Aquae, www.cyanobacteria.net assessed on 6th May 2005. [2]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Nagengast B. and Kuczyńska-Kippen N., 2015 – Macrophyte biometric features as an indicator of the trophic status of small water bodies, Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 44, 1, 38-50, doi:10.1515/ohs-2015-0005. [5]10.1515/ohs-2015-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Nevo E. and Wasser S. P. (eds), 2000 – Biodiversity of cyanoprocaryotes, algae and fungi of Israel, Cyanoprocaryotes and algae of continental Israel, Leichtenstein: A. R. G. Gantner Verlag, Ruggell, 560. [1]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Pešić V., Paunović M. and Kostianoy A. G. (eds), 2020 – The rivers of Montenegro, The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Springer, Cham., 300.10.1007/978-3-030-55712-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Poikane S., Portielje R., Denys L., Elferts D., Kelly M., Kolada A., Mäemets H., Phillips G., Søndergaard M., Willby N. and van den Berg M. S., 2018 – Macrophyte assessment in European lakes: Diverse approaches but convergent views of ‘good’ ecological status, Ecological Indicators, 94, 1, 185-197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.056.10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.056612582430393465
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Ponti M., Vadrucci M. R., Orfanidis S. and Pinna M., 2009 – Biotic indices for ecological status of transitional water ecosystems, Transitional Waters Bulletin, 3, 3, 32-90, doi:10.1285/i1825229Xv3n3p32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Porter S. D., 2008 – Algal attributes: an autecological classification of algal taxa collected by the National Water-Quality Assessment Program, Reston, V. A., U. S. Geological Survey, http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/ds329/. [4]10.3133/ds329
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Reiss K. C. and Brown M. T., 2005 – The Florida Wetland Condition Index (FWCI): developing biological indicators for isolated depressional forested wetlands, Report submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Under Contract #WM-683, Howard T. Odum Center for Wetlands, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U. S. A. 168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Romanenko V. D., Oksijuk O. P., Zhukinsky V. N., Stolberg F. V. and Lavrik V. I. 1990 – Ecological impact assessment of hydrotechnical constructions on water bodies, Kijev, Naukova Dumka, 291. (in Russian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Savitskaya K. L. 2017 – Macrophytes as indicators of the ecological state of small rivers in Minsk Region, Water Resources, 44, 840-848, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807817060070.10.1134/S0097807817060070
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Schindler D. W. 1987 – Detecting ecosystem responses to anthropogenic stress, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44, 6-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Schneider S. and Melzer A., 2003 – The Trophic Index of Macrophytes (TIM) – a new tool for indicating the trophic state of running waters, International Review of Hydrobiology, 88, 1, 49-67, https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200390005. [9]10.1002/iroh.200390005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Sládeček V., 1973 – System of water quality from the biological point of view, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 7, 1-218.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Trbojević I., Milovanović V. and Simić G. S., 2020 – The discovery of the rare Chara baueri (Charophyceae) in Serbia, Plants, 9, 1, 1606, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111606. [6]10.3390/plants9111606769917233227900
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2003 ‒ Biological Indicators of Watershed Health, http://www.epa.gov/bioindicators (accessed 2003-2004).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Van Dam H., Mertens A. and Sinkeldam J., 1994 – A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands, Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 28, 1, 117-133, doi.org/10.1007/BF02334251.10.1007/BF02334251
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. WoRMS, World Register of Marine Species, http://www.marinespecies.org/about.php.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Zueva N. V. and Bobrov A. A., 2018 – Use of macrophytes in assessing the ecological status of small river (by the Example of the Okhta River, St. Petersburg), Inland Water Biology, 11, 34-41, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082917040137.10.1134/S1995082917040137
]Search in Google Scholar
