[
1. Avşar D., 2016 – Fisheries biology and population Dynamics, Çukurova University Publications, Adana, 306. (in Turkish)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Bagenal T. B. and Braum E. (eds), 1978 – Eggs and early life history, in Methods for assessment of fish population in fresh waters, Blackwell Scientific, London, UK, 101-136.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Bănărescu P. M., 1999 – Capoeta Valenciennes, 1842, in The Freshwater Fishes of Europe, 5/1 (Cyprinidae 2), 1I: Rhodeus to Capoeta, Bănărescu P. M. (ed.), AULA-Verlag, Wiebelsheim, 383-406.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Bayır A., Sirkecioğlu A. N., Polat H. and Aras M., 2007 – Biochemical profile of blood serum of siraz C. c. umbla, Comperative Clinical Pathology, 16, 119-126.10.1007/s00580-006-0663-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Bircan R. and Polat N., 1995 – Altınkaya Baraj Gölü’ndeki Capoeta capoeta (Guldentstaedt, 1773) ’nın üreme mevsimi, yumurta verimi ve eşeysel olgunluk yaşı üzerine incelemeler, Proceedings of Eastern Anatolian Fisheries and Water Products, 287-306. (in Turkish)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Bitty Blanchard J. L., Frank K. T. and Simon J. E., 2003 – Effects of condition on fecundity and total egg production of eastern Scotian Shelf haddock, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquaict Sciences, 60, 321-332.10.1139/f03-024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Bowering W. R., 1978 – Fecundity of witch flounder (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) from St. Pierre Bank and the Grand Bank of Newfoundland, Journal of the Fish Res Board of Canada, 35, 1199-1206.10.1139/f78-191
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Brown P., Sivakumaran K. P., Stoessel D., Giles A., Green C. and Walker T., 2003 – Carp population biology in Victoria, Report Marine and Freshwater Resources, 56, 202.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Çiçek T., Kaya A. and Bilici S., 2016 – A survey on scale of Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) by geometrıc morphometric methods depend on gender, age and season variations, Turkish Journal of Aquaict Sciences, 31, 2, 96-104.10.18864/TJAS201611
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Çoban M. Z. and Şen D., 2011 – Capoeta umbla (Heckel. 1843) ’nın Hazar Gölü (Dicle Nehri) ve Keban Baraj Gölü (Fırat Nehri) populasyonlarının büyüme özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması, Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 5, 3, 180-195. (in Turkish)10.3153/jfscom.2011022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Çoban M. Z., Gündüz F., Türkgülü İ., Örnekçi N. G., Yüce S., Demirol F. and Alp A., 2013 – Reproductive properties of Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) living in Lake Hazar (Elaziğ, Turkey), International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 2, 2, 8-47.10.24102/ijafr.v2i2.191
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Das M., Dewan S. and Debnat S. C., 1989 – Studies on fecundity of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch) in a mini pond of Bangladesh, Journal of Agricultural Science, 16, 1-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Dewan S. and Doha S., 1979 – Spawning and fecundity of certain pond fishes, Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture, 4, 1-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Dinh Q. M., 2018 – Aspects of reproductive biology of the red goby Trypauchen vagina (Gobiidae) from the Mekong Delta, Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 34, 3-110.10.1111/jai.13521
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Doha S. and Hye M. A., 1970 – Fecundity of the Padma River Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton), Pakistan Journal of Sciences, 22, 176-183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Ekmekçi F. G., 1996 – Sarıyar Baraj Gölü’nde (Ankara) yaşayan Capoeta tinca (Heckel, 1843) ’nın bazı büyüme ve üreme özellikleri, Turk Journal of Zoology, 20, 117-127. (in Turkish)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Erdoğan O., 1998 – Aras Nehri’nde yaşayan Capoeta capoeta capoeta (Güldenstant, 1772) balığınn büyüme ve üreme özellikleri ile avlanma bölgesi suyunun bazı fiziko-kimyasal özelliklerinin araştırıması, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Atatürk, Erzurum, 101. (in Turkish)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Eroğlu M., Düşükcan M. and Çoban M. Z., 2018 – Özlüce Baraj Gölü’nde yaşayan Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) ’nın bazı populasyon parametreleri, KSÜ Tarim ve Doğa Dergisi, 21, 2, 229-238.10.18016/ksudobil.309596
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Esmaeili H. R., Zareian H., Eagderi S. and Alwan N., 2016 – Review on the taxonomy of tigris scraper, Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) and its confirmation record from the Iranian part of Tigris River, Persian Gulf basin (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), Fish Taxa, 1, 1, 35-44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Fontana A., 1979 – Etude du stock demersal cotier congolais. Biologie et dynamique des principales especes exploitées. Propositions d’amenagement de la pecherie, M.Sc. Thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France, 300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Freyhof J., 2014 – Capoeta umbla, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: e.T19027584A19222918, DOI: org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Gebrekiros S. T., 2016 – Factors affecting stream fish community composition and habitat suitability, Aquaculture and Marina Biology, 4, 2, 00076, DOI: 10.15406/jamb.2016.04.00076.10.15406/jamb.2016.04.00076
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Grandcourt E. M., Al-Abdessalaam T. Z, Francis F., Al-Shamsi A. T. and Hartmann S. A., 2009 – Reproductive biology and implications for management of the orange-spotted grouper Epinephelus coioides in the southern Arabian Gulf, Journal of Fish Biology, 74, 820-84110.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02163.x20735602
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Gundersen A. C., Hjqrleifsson B. and Kennedy E. J., 1990 – Fecundity of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtiushippoglossoides W.) in the waters of Iceland, Journal of Northwest Atlatic Fisheries Sciences, 40, 75-80.10.2960/J.v40.m656
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Gül A., Yılmaz M. and Solak K., 1996 – Fırat Nehri Tohma suyunda yaşayan Capoeta trutta (Heckel, 1843) ’nın büyüme özellikleri, Doğa Turkish Journal of Zoology, 20, 177-185. (in Turkish)10.55730/1300-0179.3024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Gündüz F., Demirol F., Çoban M. Z., Yüksel F., Kurtoğlu F., Yıldız N. and Kılıç A., 2015 – Some population parameters of Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) in Uzunçayir Dam Lake, International Journal of Pure Applied Sciences, 1, 2, 100-111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Güneş M., 2007 – Determination of some bio-ecological properties and total fat a fatty acid compositions of Capoeta capoeta umbla Heckel, 1843 populations living in Tercan Dam and Tuzla River, Thesis master, Atatürk University of Atatürk. (in Turkish)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Helfmann G. S., Collette B. B. and Facey D. E., 1997 – The diversity of fishes, Blackwell Science, London, 529.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Holden M. K. and Raitt D. F. S., 1974 – Methods of resource investigation and their application, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Fisheries Technical Paper, 1, Rome, 115.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Jeeva V., Kumar S., Verma D. and Rumana H. S.,2011 – River fragmentation and connectivity problems in Gange River of upper Himalayas: the effect on the fish communities (India); Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 12, The Wetlands Diversity, 75-90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Kara C., Alp A. and Şimşekli M., 2010 – Distribution of fish fauna on the upper and middle basin of Ceyhan River, Turkey, Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 10, 111-121.10.4194/trjfas.2010.0116
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Kar D. and Khynriam D., 2020 – On a recent pioneering taxonomic study of the fishes from rivers Diyung, Vomvadung, Khualzangvadung, Tuikoi and Mahur in Dima Hasao District of Assam (India), Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 22.3, The Wetlands Diversity, 83-106.10.2478/trser-2020-0019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Kılıç M., 2015 – Human and economic geography in Solhan (Bingöl), Ph. D. Thesis, University of Fırat, Elazığ, Turkey, 117. (in Turkish)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Khoshnood Z., 2014 – Identification and study of fish species in Karkheh River (Iran); Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 16.2, The Wetlands Diversity, 97-106.10.1515/trser-2015-0018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Komalefe O. O. and Arawomo G. A. O., 2007 – Reproductive strategy of Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces: Cichlidae) in Opa Reservoir, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, Revista De Biologia Tropical, 55, 2, 595-602.10.15517/rbt.v55i2.603419069769
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Kraus G., Tomkiewicz J. and Köster F. W., 2002 – Egg production of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) in relation to variable sex ratio, maturity, and fecundity, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquaict Sciences, 59, 1908-1920.10.1139/f02-159
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Miller P. J. 1984 – The tokology of gobioid fishes, in Potts G. W. and Wootton R. J. (eds), Fish reproduction: Strategies and tactics, Academic Press, London, 119-153.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Mitton J. B. and Lewis W. M., 1989 – Relationships between genetic variability and life-history features of bony fishes, Evolution, 43, 1712-1723.10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02621.x28564340
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Moyle P. B. and Cech J. J, 2004 – Fishes, an introduction to ichthyology, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 726.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Muchlisin Z. A., Musman M. and Siti-Azizah M. N., 2010 – Spawning seasons of Rasbora tawarensis in Lake Laut Tawar, Aceh Province, Indonesia, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 8, 49.10.1186/1477-7827-8-49288787820482777
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Murua H. and Saborido-Rey F., 2003 – Female reproductive strategies of marine fish species of the North Atlantic, Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Sciences, 33, 23-31.10.2960/J.v33.a2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Nikolsky G. V., 1980 – Theory of fish population dynamics as the biological background for rational exploitation and management of fishery resources, Otto Koeltz Science Publishers, Koengstein, 323.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Özdemir N., 1982 – Elazığ-Hazar gölünde bulunan Capoeta capoeta umbla’nın (Heckel, 1843) ekonomik değeri ve yetiştirilme olanaklarına ilişkin biyolojik özellikleri, Doğa Veteriner, Hayvancılık ve Ormancılık Dergisi, 6, 69-75. (in Turkish)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Öztürk S., 1996 – The reproductions biology of Capoeta capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) living in Hazar Lake, Thesis master, University of Fırat, Elazığ, 1996, 45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Pinhorn A. T., 1984 – Temporal and spatial variation in fecundity of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in Newfoundland waters, Journal of NW Atlantic Fisheries Sciences, 5, 161-170.10.2960/J.v5.a20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Power M., Dempson J. B., Reist J. D., Schwarz C. J. and Power G., 2005 – Latitudinal variation in fecundity among Arctic char populations in eastern North America, Journal of Fish Biology, 67, 255-273.10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00734.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Radkhah A. R. and Eagderi S., 2020 – Investigation on the global distribution of invasive fish species, convict cichlid Amatitlania nigrofasciata (Perciformes, Cichclidae) over the past years with emphasis on Iranian inland waters, Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 22.3, The Wetlands Diversity, 45-56.10.2478/trser-2020-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Reynaldo de la Cruz E., Cendejas M. E. V., Machado S. R., Fernández F. G. and Torres A. V., 2020 – Diversity and structure of the ichthyologic communities in the diving sites in Holguin (Cuba), Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 22.3, The Wetlands Diversity, 57-82.10.2478/trser-2020-0018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Rideout R. M. and Morgan M. J., 2007 – Major changes in fecundity and the effect on population egg production for three species of Northwest Atlantic flatfish, Journal of Fish Biology, 70, 1759-1779.10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01448.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Rios J. M., 2021 – Predation by the nonnative raimbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykis (Walbaum, 1792), on the native biota from freshwater environment of the central Andes (Argentina), Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 23.1, The Wetlands Diversity, 67-72.10.2478/trser-2021-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Sarker P. K., Pal H. K., Rahman M. M. and Rahman M. M., 2002 – Observation on the fecundity and gonado-somatic index of Mystus gulio in brackish waters of Bangladesh, Journal of Biological Sciences, 2, 235-237.10.3923/jbs.2002.235.237
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Shafi M., Quddus M. M. A. and Rahman S., 1978 – Fecundity of Indian Halibut, Psettodes erumei (Bloch and Schneider) from the Bay of Bengal Bangladesh, Journal of Zoology, 6, 113-120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Sheridan A. K., 2008 – The genetic impacts of human activities on wild fish populations, Reviews in Fisheries Science, 3, 2, 91-108.10.1080/10641269509388568
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Sosai A. S., 2015 – Illegal fishing in southern Mannar Island coastal area (Sri Lanka), Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 17.1, The Wetlands Diversity, 95-108.10.1515/trser-2015-0051
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Su G., Logez M., Xu J., Tao S., Villéger S. and Brosse S., 2021 – Human impacts on global freshwater fish biodiversity, Science, 371, 6531, 835-838, DOI: 10.1126/science.abd3369.10.1126/science.abd336933602854
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Sümbüloğlu K. and Sümbüloğlu V., 2019 – Biyoistatistik, Hatipoğlu Yayıncılık, 299. (in Turkish)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Şen D., 1988 – Investigation of Kalecik, Karakoçan Pond (Elazığ) and aquculture, Doğa Türk Biyoloji Dergisi, 12, 1988, 69-85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Tomkiewicz J., Morgan M. J., Burnett M. and Saborido-Rey F., 2003 – Available information for estimating reproductive potential of Northwest Atlantic groundfish stocks, Journal of Northwest Fisheries Sciences, 33, 1-21.10.2960/J.v33.a1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Trichkova T., Stefanov T., Vassilev M. and Zivkov M., 2009 – Fish species diversity in the rivers of the north-west Bulgaria, Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 8, The Wetlands Diversity, 161-168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Turan D., Kottelat M., Ekmekçi F. G. and İmamoğlu H. O., 2006 – A review of Capoeta tinca, with descriptions of two new species from Turkey (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 113, 2, 421-436, DOI: 10.5962/bhl.part.80358.10.5962/bhl.part.80358
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Türkmen M., Erdoğan O., Yıldırım A. and Akyurt İ., 2002 – Reproduction tactics age and growth of C. c. umbla Heckel, 1843 from the Aşkale Region of the Karasu River, Turkey, Fisheries Research, 54, 317-328.10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00266-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Ünlü E., 1991 – Dicle Nehri՚nde yaþayan Capoeta trutta (Heckel, 1843) ‘nin biyolojik özellikleri üzerine çalışmalar, Turkish Journal of Zoology, 15, 22-38. (in Turkish)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Wright R. M. and Shoesmith E. A., 1988 – The reproductive success of pike, Esox lucius: aspects of fecundity, egg density and survival, Journal of Fish Biology, 33, 623-636.10.1111/j.1095-8649.1988.tb05505.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Yeldan H. and Avşar D., 2000 – A preliminary study on the reproduction of the rabbitfish (Siganus rivulatus (Forsskal, 1775) in the Northeastern Mediterranean, Turkish Journal of Zoology, 24, 2, 173-182.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Yıldırım A. and Aras S., 2000 – Some reproduction characteristics of Capoeta tinca (Heckel, 1843) living in the Oltu stream of Çoruh basin, Turkish Journal of Zoology, 24, 95-101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Yüce S. and Şen D., 2003 – Reproduction properties of Capoeta capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) living in Hazar Lake (Elazığ), Fırat Journal of Science and Technology, 15, 1, 107-116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Yüksel F., 2002 – Biological characteristics in terms of fishing of Capoeta capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) living Hazar Lake, Fırat Journal of Science and Technology, 14, 2, 193-200.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. Yılmaz M., Gül A. and Solak K., 2003 – Growh performance of Capoeta capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843) living in the region between Sivas and Erzincan of upper Euphrates, Gazi Journal of Education, 23, 2, 23-40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. Zivkov M. and Petrova G., 1993 – On the pattern of correlation between the fecundity, length, weight and age of pikeperch Stizostedion lucioperca, Journal of Fish Biology, 43, 2, 173-182.10.1111/j.1095-8649.1993.tb00421.x
]Search in Google Scholar
, 