[
Alos-Ferrer, C., Garagnany, M. and Hugelschäfer, S., 2016. Cognitive reflection, decision biases, and response time. Front. Psychol, vol. 7, pp. 1-21. [Accessed 28 February 2021]. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01402/full.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, L. W. et al., 2001. A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aristotle, 1987 [350 B. C. E.]. On the soul. (trans. from class. Greek: J. A. Smith). [Accessed 10 April 2021]. Available at: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.html.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bachtin, M., 1990 [1923]. The author and the hero in aesthetic activity. Art and answerability. M. Holquist and V. Liapunov, eds. Austin: Texas UP.10.7560/704114
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barsalou, L. W., 1992. Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In: A. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay, еds. Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 21-74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bazylevych, N. V., 2013. Egocentric modus of the discourse of reflection (based on W. Churchill’s works of historic and memoir genre). European Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 7-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bazylevych, N. V., 2014. Methodology of distinguishing the contexts of author’s reflection. European Applied Sciences, vol. 9, pp.7-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bazylevych, N. V., 2015. Political leader’s reflection discourse in linguistic and cognitive perspective (based on W. Churchill’s historic and memoir works). PhD diss., Kherson: Kherson state university.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bizyaeva, A. A., 2004. Psychology of a thinking teacher: Pedagogical reflection. Pskov: S. M. Kirov.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bloom, B. S., 1976. Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchill, W., 1899. The river war. [Accessed 10 April 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/1899RiverWarVol1/page/n473/mode/2up.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchill, W., 1916. The story of the Malakand field force. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons, Ltd. [Accessed 15 April 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/storyofmralakandf00chur/page/n7/mode/2up.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchill, W., 1923. The world crisis, 1911-1918. [Accessed 22 April 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.523355/page/n3/mode/2up.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchill, W., 1948. The gathering storm. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Company. [Accessed 6 May 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/gatheringstorm00chur_1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchill, W., 1949. Their finest hour. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. [Accessed 22 April 2021]. Available at: https://archirve.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.4388/page/n12/mode/2up.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchill, W., 1950а. The grand alliance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. [Accessed 24 April 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/grandalliance00chur_0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchill, W., 1950b. The hinge of fate. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. [Accessed 7 May 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/hingeoffate00chur_0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchill, W., 1951. Closing the ring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. [Accessed 20 May 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/closingring00churrich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Churchill, W., 1953. Triumph and tragedy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. [Accessed 28 May 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/triumphtragedy00chur_1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davidson, D., 1989. The conditions of thought. Grazer Philosophische Studien, vol. 36, no. 1, pp.193-200. [Accessed 28 May 2021]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5840/gps19893627.10.5840/gps19893627
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dewey, J., 1933. How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. [Accessed 27 February 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/howwethinkrestat00dewerich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fenwick, T., 2001. Experiential learning: A theoretical critique from five perspectives. Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education (ERIK). [Accessed 28 February 2021]. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED454418.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fillmore, J. and Baker C., 2012. A frames approach to semantic analysis. The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. pp.313-339.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frankish, K., 2009. Systems and levels: Dual-system theories and the personal – subpersonal distinction. In: J. S. B. T. Evans and K. Frankish, eds. Two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89-107.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frankish, K., 2010. Dual-process and dual-system theories of reasoning. Philosophy Compass, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 914-926.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00330.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, G., 2001. Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further education unit. Oxford Polytechnic: Oxford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanebeck, J., 2017. Understanding metalepsis: The hermeneutics of narrative transgression. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110516920
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans, J. S. B. T. and Stanovich, K. E., 2013. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 223-241.10.1177/1745691612460685
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Entman, R. B., 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51-58. [Accessed 13 April 2021]. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helyer, R., 2015. Learning through reflection: The critical role of reflection in work-based learning (WBL). Journal of Work-applied Management, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 15-27. [Accessed 1 June 2021]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2015-003.10.1108/JWAM-10-2015-003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Humboldt, W., 2019 [1795]. Über Denken und Sprechen. [About thinking and speaking]. [Accessed 13 April 2021]. Available at: https://www.gleichsatz.de/b-u-t/trad/humb.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jenkins, R., 1996. Social identity. London: Routledge. [Accessed 2 June 2021]. Available at: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/40841/1/21.pdf.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jung, C. G., 1990 [1921]. Psychological types: The collected works of C.G. Jung. vol. 6. H. G. Baynes and R. F. C. Hull (trans. from germ.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klinkovitz, J., 2017. Metafiction. [Accessed 15 June 2021]. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/literature/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-546.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koopman, E. M. and Hakemulder, F., 2015. Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 79-111. [Accessed 15 June 2021]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0005.10.1515/jlt-2015-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Z., 2018. Metaphor in media language and cognition: A perspective from conceptual metaphor theory. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 124-141.10.2478/lart-2018-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lippert, F. and Schmid, M., 2019. Self-reflection in literature. Internationale Forschungen zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft, vol. 202. [Accessed 24 February 2021]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004407114.10.1163/9789004407114
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Locke, J., 1984 [1721]. An essay concerning human understanding. A. C. Fraser, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Accessed 25 February 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/concerninghumanu01lockuoft.10.1093/oseo/instance.00279613
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lodge, D., 2018. Consciousness and the novel. New-York: Penguin Random House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manzoor, H., Saeed, S. and Panhwar, A. H., 2019. Use of discourse analysis in various disciplines. International Journal of English Linguistics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 301-309.10.5539/ijel.v9n3p301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. and Valera, F., 1998. Tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. [Accessed 21 February 2021]. Available at: https://archive.org/details/maturana-1987-tree-of-knowledge/page/n17/mode/2up.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meretoja, H., 2016. Exploring the possible: philosophical reflection, historical imagination, and narrative agency. Narrative Works: Issues, Investigations & Interventions, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 82-107. [Accessed 4 June 2021]. Available at: https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/NW/article/view/25447.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morozova, O., 2017. Monomodal and multimodal instantiations of conceptual metaphors of Brexit. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 250-283.10.1515/lart-2017-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neumann, B. and Nünning, A., 2012. Metanarration and metafiction. In: P. Hühn, ed. The Living Handbook of Narratology. Hamburg University. [Accessed 15 June 2021]. Available at: http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/metanarration-and-metafiction.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nikonova, V. and Boyko, Y., 2019. Gender-specific emotivity of Victorian female prose from a multidimensional perspective. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47-82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nurhamidah I., Purwanto S. and Ekaningsih N., 2019. A literary work as self- reflection of the author: Why and how it is manifested. Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 194-203.10.30659/e.4.2.194-203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plato, 1997. Complete works. J.M Cooper and D.S Hutchinson, еds. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piaget, J., 2014 [1977]. Studies in reflective abstraction. New-York: Psychology Press.10.4324/9781315800509
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodgers, C., 2002. Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 842-866.10.1111/1467-9620.00181
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roth, P. A., 1989. Preparing the reflective practitioner: Transforming the apprentice through the dialectic. Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 31-35.10.1177/002248718904000206
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santovetti, O., 2015. Self-reflection in Italian literature. The Italianist, no 35, pp.309-317. [Accessed 15 April 2021]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1179/0261434015Z.000000000137.10.1179/0261434015Z.000000000137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saussure, de F., 2011 [1916]. Course in general linguistics. (Translated by W. Baskin), P. Meisel and H. Saussy, eds. New York: Columbia University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shane, F., 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 25-42. [Accessed 15 April 2021]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4981739_Cognitive_Reflection_and_Decision_Making.10.1257/089533005775196732
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shermis, S., 1992. Critical thinking: helping students learn reflectively. [Accessed 16 June 2021]. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED341954.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stevens, D. D. and Cooper, J. E., 2017. Journal keeping: How to use reflective writing for learning, teaching, professional insight, and positive change. [Accessed 18 February 2021]. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470753460.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stephens, A. and Tjøstheim, T. A., 2020. The cognitive philosophy of reflection. [Accessed 19 April 2021]. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10670-020-00299-0.pdf.10.1007/s10670-020-00299-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tykhomyrova, O., 2018. Metafiction in contemporary English-language prose: narrative and stylistic aspects. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 363-416.10.2478/lart-2018-0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uberman, A., 2018. Frame analysis of the concept of death across cultures. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 417-447.10.2478/lart-2018-0011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Dijk, T. A., 2015. Critical discourse analysis. In: D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton and D. Schiffrin, eds. The handbook of discourse analysis. Wiley Blackwell: Chichester, Malden, pp. 466-485.10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vasen, T., 2015. Inside the mind of the author. [Accessed 19 May 2021]. Available at: http://www.vacentaylor.com/inside-the-mind-of-the-author/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vos, H. and Cowan, J., 2009. Reflection and teaching: А taxonomy. [Accessed 18 May 2021]. Available at: https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/reflection-and-teaching-a-taxonomy.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, Yi., 2015. On cognitive processes of analysis and synthesis in cognitive computing. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 177-17. [Accessed 17 May 2021]. Available at: https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/information/2015/a3472607-124.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wendland, E. R., 2010. Framing the frames: A theoretical framework for the cognitive notion of “Frames of Reference”. Journal of Translation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 27-50. [Accessed 18 May 2021]. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.469.6507&rep=rep1&type=pdf.10.54395/jot-ww9v6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, D., 2000. Metapresentations in linguistic communication. [Accessed 24 February 2021]. Available at: https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/99papers/wilson.pdf.10.1093/oso/9780195141146.003.0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhabotynska, S., 2010. Principles of building conceptual models for thesaurus dictionaries. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, vol. 1., pp. 75-92. [Accessed 24 February 2021]. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/kkd_2010_1_7.
]Search in Google Scholar
