Open Access

Foids are worse than animals. A cognitive linguistics analysis of dehumanizing metaphors in online discourse


Cite

Bastian, B. and Haslam, N., 2011. Experiencing dehumanization: Cognitive and emotional effects of everyday dehumanization. Basic and Applied Social. Psychology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 295–303.10.1080/01973533.2011.614132Search in Google Scholar

Berberović, S. and Mujagić, M., 2017. A marriage of convenience or an amicable divorce: Metaphorical blends in the debates on Brexit. ExELL, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–24.10.2478/exell-2018-0001Search in Google Scholar

Bermingham, A. et al. 2009. Combining social network analysis and sentiment analysis to explore the potential for online radicalization. In: 2009 International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining. Paper presented at the 2009 International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, pp. 231–236.Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, L. and Brandt, P.A., 2005. Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 216–249.10.1075/arcl.3.12braSearch in Google Scholar

Burris, V., Smith, E. and Strahm, A., 2000. White supremacist networks on the internet. Sociological Focus, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 215–235.10.1080/00380237.2000.10571166Search in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J., 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230000612Search in Google Scholar

Costello, K. and Hodson, G., 2014. Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice. The British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 175–197.10.1111/bjso.12016Search in Google Scholar

Crisp, P. et al. The Pragglejaz Group, 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 22, no.1, pp. 1–39.10.1207/s15327868ms2201_1Search in Google Scholar

Donnelly, D. et al. 2001. Involuntary celibacy: A life course analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 159–169.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M., 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M., 2003. Conceptual blending, form and meaning. Recherches en Communication, vol. 19: Sémiotique cognitive — Cognitive Semiotics, pp. 57-86.10.14428/rec.v19i19.48413Search in Google Scholar

Fontecha, A.F. and Jiménez Catalán, R.M., 2003. Semantic derogation in animal metaphor: A contrastive-cognitive analysis of two male/female examples in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 771–797.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00127-3Search in Google Scholar

Gerstenfeld, P.B., Grant, D.R. and Chiang, C.-P., 2003. Hate online: A Content analysis of extremist internet sites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–44.10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00013.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gibbs, R.W., 2015. Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future? Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 90, pp. 73–76.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016Search in Google Scholar

Ging, D., 2017. Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men Masculinities, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 638-657.10.1177/1097184X17706401Search in Google Scholar

Gotell, L. and Dutton, E., 2016. Sexual violence in the ‘manosphere’: Antifeminist men’s rights discourses on rape. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 65-80.10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i2.310Search in Google Scholar

Grady, J., 2005. Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1595–1614.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012Search in Google Scholar

Grady, J., Coulson, S. and Oakley, T., 1999. Blending and metaphor. In: G. Steen & R. Gibbs, eds. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins, Philadelphia, pp. 101–124.10.1075/cilt.175.07graSearch in Google Scholar

Hart, C., 2008. Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework. Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91–106.10.1080/17405900801990058Search in Google Scholar

Haslam, N., 2006. Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 252–264.10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4Search in Google Scholar

Hodson, G., MacInnis, C.C. and Costello, K., 2014. (Over)valuing “humanness” as an aggravator of intergroup prejudices and discrimination. In: P. G. Bain, J. Vaes, & J.-P. Leyens, eds. Humanness and Dehumanization. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 86–110.Search in Google Scholar

Jaki, S., et al. 2019. Online hatred of women in the Incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 240–268.Search in Google Scholar

Jane, E.A., 2018. Systemic misogyny exposed: Translating rapeglish from the manosphere with a random rape threat generator. International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 661–680.10.1177/1367877917734042Search in Google Scholar

Khondker, H. H., 2011. Role of the new media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 675–679.10.1080/14747731.2011.621287Search in Google Scholar

Koller, V., 2005. Critical discourse analysis and social cognition: Evidence from business media discourse. Discourse & Society, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 199–224.10.1177/0957926505049621Search in Google Scholar

Krzeszowski, T.P., 1997. Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warszawa: Energeia.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., 1991. Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify War in the Gulf. Peace Research, vol. 23, no. 2/3, pp. 25–32.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Turner, M., 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Marwick, A.E., Caplan, R., 2018. Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–559.10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568Search in Google Scholar

Müller, K., Schwarz, C., 2018. Fanning the flames of hate: Social media and hate crime. [Accessed 10 January 2020]. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/crschwarz/fanning-flames-hate.pdf10.2139/ssrn.3082972Search in Google Scholar

Musolff, A., 2012. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 301–310.10.1080/17405904.2012.688300Search in Google Scholar

Omotoyinbo, F.R., 2014. Online radicalization: the net or the netizen? Social Technologies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–61.10.13165/ST-14-4-1-04Search in Google Scholar

Perez, N.P., 2013. Roles of women in advertising: The objectification of women and the shift to an empowering ad frame. [Accessed 10 January 2020]. Available at: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/22407Search in Google Scholar

Prażmo, E., 2019. “Leftie snowflakes” and other metaphtonymies in the British political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 371–392.10.1075/jlp.17073.praSearch in Google Scholar

Prażmo, E. and Augustyn, R., 2020. Parasites, herbivores and dried fish: Dehumanizing metaphorical blends in Japanese. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 148-167.10.17576/gema-2020-2002-09Search in Google Scholar

Ribeiro, M.H. et al. 2020. The Evolution of the manosphere across the web. arXiv: Computers and Society. [Accessed 22 August 2020]. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07600Search in Google Scholar

Rigato, E. and Minelli, A., 2013. The great chain of being is still here. Evolution: Education and Outreach, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-6.10.1186/1936-6434-6-18Search in Google Scholar

Schröder, U., 2015. Metaphorical blends and their function in discourse on society: A cross-cultural study. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 50–78.10.1075/cogls.2.1.03schSearch in Google Scholar

Semino, E., 2010. Unrealistic scenarios, metaphorical blends and rhetorical strategies across genres. English Text Construction, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 250–274.10.1075/etc.3.2.07semSearch in Google Scholar

Soral, W., Bilewicz, M. and Winiewski, M., 2018. Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desensitization. Aggressive Behavior, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 136–146.10.1002/ab.21737Search in Google Scholar

Steen, G., 2010. When is metaphor deliberate? In: Selected Papers from the 2008 Stockholm Metaphor Festival. pp. 43–63.Search in Google Scholar

Steen, G., 2014. Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Cognitive Semiotics, vol. 5, no. 1-2, pp.179–197.10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.179Search in Google Scholar

Steen, G., 2017. Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp.1–24.10.1515/ip-2017-0001Search in Google Scholar

Steen, G., Reijnierse, G. and Burgers, C., 2014. When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLOS ONE, vol. 9, no. 12, [Accessed 15 April 2019]. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0113536Search in Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. and Boroditsky, L., 2011. Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLOS ONE, vol. 6, no. 2, [Accessed 23 January 2019]. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.001678210.1371/journal.pone.0016782Search in Google Scholar

Tipler, C.N. and Ruscher, J.B., 2019. Dehumanizing representations of women: The shaping of hostile sexist attitudes through animalistic metaphors. Journal of Gender Studies, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 109–118.10.1080/09589236.2017.1411790Search in Google Scholar

Torok, R., 2013. Developing an explanatory model for the process of online radicalization and terrorism. Security Informatics, vol. 2, no. 6. [Accessed 10 May 2019]. Available at: https://security-informatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2190-8532-2-610.1186/2190-8532-2-6Search in Google Scholar

Townsend, E., 2014. Hate speech or genocidal discourse? An examination of anti-Roma sentiment in contemporary Europe. PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, vol. 11, no. 1. [Accessed 23 May 2019]. Available at: https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/3287/437010.5130/portal.v11i1.3287Search in Google Scholar

Ungerer, F. and Schmid, H.-J., 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. New York:Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, T.A., 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 249–283.10.1177/0957926593004002006Search in Google Scholar

Waśniewska, M., 2017. The socio-parasite and bio-parasite metaphorical concepts in racist discourse. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, vol. 17, pp. 46–61.10.15290/cr.2017.17.2.03Search in Google Scholar

Waśniewska, M., 2018. A dog or a wolf – The role of connotations in animalistic metaphors and the process of dehumanisation. New Horizons in English Studies, vol. 3, pp. 3-17.10.17951/nh.2018.3.3Search in Google Scholar

Wills, D., 2009. At war with metaphor: Media, propaganda, and racism in the war on terror. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2199-6504
ISSN:
1337-7590
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Linguistics and Semiotics, Theoretical Frameworks and Disciplines, Linguistics, other, Philosophy of Language