Slovak ‘no’ and its pragmatic meanings and functions in relation to prosody

Allgood, R. and Heaton, P., 2015. Developmental change and cross-domain links in vocal and musical emotion recognition performance in childhood. onlinelibrary.wiley.com [Accessed 18 February 2019]. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjdp.1209710.1111/bjdp.12097Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, G., 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.84Search in Google Scholar

Austin, L. J., 1975. How to Do Thing with Words. New York: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Beňuš, Š., 2012. Prosodic forms and pragmatic meanings: the case of the discourse marker ‘no’ in Slovak. Paper presented at 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom. Košice, Slovakia, 2-5 December.10.1109/CogInfoCom.2012.6421961Search in Google Scholar

Beňuš, Š., Gravano, A. and Hirschberg, J., 2007. Prosody, emotions, and… whatever. Paper presented at 8th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Antwerp, Belgium, 27-31 August.10.21437/Interspeech.2007-691Search in Google Scholar

Blake, L.M., 2017. The Right Hemisphere and Disorders of Cognition and Communication: Theory and Clinical Practice. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Brinton, J. L., 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110907582Search in Google Scholar

Briton, N. J. and Hall, J. A., 1995. Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. link.springer.com [Accessed 18 February 2019]. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01544758Search in Google Scholar

Cole, J., 2015. Prosody in Context: A review. tandfonline.com [Accessed 17 February 2019]. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23273798.2014.963130?scroll=top&needAccess=trueSearch in Google Scholar

De Ruiter, J. P., Mutterer, H. and Enfield, N. J., 2006. Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 515-535.10.1353/lan.2006.0130Search in Google Scholar

Dupuis, K. and Pichora-Fuller, M. K., 2010. Use of affective prosody by young and older adults. psycnet.apa.org [Accessed 03 March 2019]. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-04859-002Search in Google Scholar

Duranti, A., 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Findra, J., 2004. Štylistika slovenčiny. Martin: Osveta.Search in Google Scholar

Gravano, A., Beňuš, Š., Chávez, H., Hirschberg, J. and Wilcox, L., 2007. On the role of context and prosody in the interpretation of ´okay´. Paper presented at 45^th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics. Prague, Czech Republic, 23-30 June.Search in Google Scholar

Golato, A. and Fagyal, Z., 2008. Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token ja and the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 241-270.10.1080/08351810802237834Search in Google Scholar

Hirschberg, J. and Litman, D., 1993. Empirical Studies on the Disambiguation of Cue Phrases. dl.acm.org [Accessed 30 January 2019]. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=972490Search in Google Scholar

Hirst, G., 1997. Context as a Spurious Concept. ftp.cs.toronto.edu. [Accessed 12 February 2019]. Available at: http://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Hirst-Context-97.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Hockey, A. B., 1993. Prosody and the role of the okay and uh-huh in discourse. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu [Accessed 12 February 2019]. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.31.2337&rep=rep1&type=pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Hölker, K., 1988. Zur Analyse Von Markern: Korrektur- und Schlussmarker des Französischen. Stuttgart : F. Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, A. H. and Ziv, Y., 1998. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.57Search in Google Scholar

Laussen, A. and Schacht, A., 2018. Biological sex Differences in the Recognition of Vocal Emotions. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov [Accessed 03 March 2019]. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5996252/Search in Google Scholar

Lee, L., Bartkova, K., Jouvet, D., Dargnat, M. and Keromnes, Y., 2019. Can prosody meet pragmatics? Case of discourse particles in French. Paper presented at International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia, 5-9 August.Search in Google Scholar

Mistrík, J., 1997. Štylistika. Bratislava: SPN.Search in Google Scholar

Paulmann, S., Pell, M. D. and Kotz, S.A., 2008. How aging affects the recognition of emotional speech. mcgill.ca [Accessed 18 February 2019]. Available at: https://www.mcgill.ca/pell_lab/files/pell_lab/paulmann_pell__kotz_2008b.pdf10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Récanati, F., 1987. Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Archive.Search in Google Scholar

Romero, P., 2010. Phantom Stress: Brain Training to Master Relationship Stress. Bloomington, IN, USA: Xlibris Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Sridhar, V. K. R., Bangalore, S. and Narayanan, S., 2009. Combining lexical, syntactic and prosodic cues for improved online dialog act tagging. ict.usc.edu [Accessed 02 March 2019]. Available at: http://ict.usc.edu/pubs/Combining%20lexical,%20syntactic%20and%20prosodic%20cues%20for%20improved%20online%20dialog%20act%20tagging.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Svartvik, J. and Stenström A. B., 1985. Words, words, words: The rest is silence? In: S. Bäckman and G. Kjellmer, eds. Papers on language and literature. Presented to Alvar Ellegärd and Erik Frykman. Göteborg : Humanities Pr, pp. 342-353.Search in Google Scholar

Volín, J., Weingartová, L. and Niebuhr, O., 2016. The Prosody of the Czech Discourse Marker ‘Jasně’: An Analysis of Forms and Functions. Phonetica vol. 73, no. 3-4, pp. 314-337.10.1159/000449002Search in Google Scholar