[BUDA, B., 2006. Az empátia. Budapest: UrbisKiadό.]Search in Google Scholar
[BYRNE, P.S. and LONG, B.E., 1976. Doctors talking to patients London: H. M. Stationery Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[CERNY, M., 2009. The three-part structures of medical interviews. Discourse and Interaction, vol. 2, no.1, pp.135-147.]Search in Google Scholar
[CERNY, M., 2011. Doctor-patient communication research in a digital world. Topics in Linguistics, vol. 7, pp. 49-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[COULTHARD, M., 1977. An introduction to discourse analysis Longman: London.]Search in Google Scholar
[FISHER, S. and TODD, A., 1983. The social organization of doctor-patient communication Washington, D. C.: Center for Applied Linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[FOUCAULT, M., 1969. The archeology of knowledge Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. Routledge: London.]Search in Google Scholar
[FOUCAULT, M., 1994. The birth of the clinic New York: Tavistock.]Search in Google Scholar
[GARVIN, B.J. and KENNEDY, C. W., 1986. Confirmation-disconfirmation: A framework for the studyof interpersonalrelationships. In: P. Chinn, ed. Nursing research methodology Rockville, MD: Aspen GRANT, C. H.and ROSENFELD, L. B., 2000. Patients’ perception of physician communication and outcomes. Health Communication, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 23-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[LABOV, W. and FANSHEL, D., 1977. Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation New York: AcademicPress.]Search in Google Scholar
[MCQUOWN, N. A., 1971. Forward. In: N. A. McQuown, ed. The natural history of an interview Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 1-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[MISHLER, E. G.,1984. The discourse of medicine. dialecticsof medical interviews Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.]Search in Google Scholar
[MOSOVICI, S., 2000. Social representation: Studies in social psychology London:Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[NORTHOUSE, P.G. and NORTHOUSE, L. L., 1998. Health communication PrenticeHall: Connecticut. PARSONS, T., 1991. The social system. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[PERCY, W., 1987. The message in the bottle: How queer man is, how queer language is, and whatone has to do with the other New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.]Search in Google Scholar
[ROGERS, C., A wayof being 1995. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.]Search in Google Scholar
[SACKS, H., SCHEGLOFF, E. and JEFFERSON, G., 1974. Asimplest systematics for the organization of turn-takingfor conversation. Language, vol. 50, pp. 696-735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHIFFRIN, D., TANNEN, D. and HAMILTON, E. E., 2008. The handbookof discourse analysis. Blackwell Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[SHUY, R., 1983. Three types of effective exchange of information in the medical interview. In: S. Fisherand A. Todd, eds. The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Washington, D. C. Center for Applied Linguistics, pp.89-202.]Search in Google Scholar
[SIEBURG, E., 1969. Dysfunctional communication and interpersonal responsiveness in smallgroups. Doctoral dissertation, Denver, 1969. University Microfilm. No. 69-21. p. 156.]Search in Google Scholar
[STUART, G. W. and SUNDEEN, S. J., 1995. Principlesand practice of psychiatric nursing. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby. In: L.G. Northouse, ed. Health Communication. Prentice Hall. p. 62.]Search in Google Scholar
[THORNBORROW, J., 2002. Power talk: Language and interaction in institutional discourse. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[TRINGER, L., 2007. A gyόgyítό beszélgetés. Budapest: Medicina Könyvkiadό.]Search in Google Scholar
[WAITZKIN, H., 1989. A critical theory of medicaldiscourse:Ideology, socialcontrol, and the processing of social contexts in medicalencounters. Journalof Health and Social Behavior, vol. 30, pp. 220-239.10.2307/2137015]Search in Google Scholar
[WODAK, R. and MEYER, M., 2009. Methodsfor criticaldiscourse analysis. London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[YOUNG, R.F. and LEE, J., 2004. Identifying unitsin interaction: Reactive tokens in Korean and English conversations. Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 380-407.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00266.x]Search in Google Scholar
