Journal Details
First Published
10 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

A Lesson for Covidiots1,2 About Some Contact Induced Borrowing of American English Morphological Processes Into Dutch

Published Online: 04 Jun 2021
Page range: -
Journal Details
First Published
10 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

This paper discusses morphological borrowing from American-English to Dutch. Three processes of non-morphemic word formation are studied: embellished clipping (Afro from African), libfixing (extracting segments from opaque wordforms such -topia from utopia and -(po)calypse from apocalypse) and blending (stagflation < stagnation + inflation). It will be shown that the borrowing of these processes started with borrowing of English lexical material followed by a process of reinterpretation, which subsequently led to the (re-)introduction of the processes in Dutch. Therefore, the traditional distinction between MAT and PAT borrowing turns out to be inadequate. Instead of a clear-cut difference between lexical and morphological borrowing a borrowing cline will be proposed. The respective ends of this cline are MAT and PAT.


Algeo, John. 1977. Blends, a structural and systemic view. American Speech 52(1–2). 47–64. DOI: 10.2307/454719Search in Google Scholar

Algeo, John. 1998. Vocabulary. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol 4: 1776–1997. Cambridge University Press: 57–91.Search in Google Scholar

Ayto, John. 2003. Newspapers and neologisms. In Jean Aitchinson & Diana M. Lewis (eds.), New media language, Routledge. 182–186.Search in Google Scholar

Backus, Albert (= Ad). 2012. A usage-based approach to borrowability. Tilburg University.Search in Google Scholar

Backus, Ad. 2014. A usage-based approach to borrowability. In Eline Zenner & Gitte Kristiansen (eds.), New perspectives on lexical borrowing: Onomasiological, methodological and phraseological innovations, De Grutyer Mouton. 19–39. DOI: 10.1515/9781614514305.19Search in Google Scholar

Balteiro, Isabel & Laurie Bauer. 2019. Introduction. Lexis 14. DOI: 10.4000/lexis.4085Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1994. Watching English change. An introduction to the study of linguistic change in standard Englishes in the twentieth century. Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie & Rodney Huddleston. 2002. Lexical word-formation. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, Cambridge University Press: 1621–1722. DOI: 10.1017/9781316423530.020Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2012. The grammar of words. An introduction to linguistic morphology (3rd edn.). Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2019. The morphology of Dutch (2nd end.). Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert & Ariane van Santen. 2017. Morfologie. De woordstructuur van het Nederlands (3rd edn.). Amsterdam University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Bree, Cor. 2020. Leerboek voor de historische grammatica van het Nederlands. Deel 2: Flexie woordvorming. Leiden Universiteit.Search in Google Scholar

Bryant, Margaret M. 1974. Blends are increasing. American Speech 49(3–4). 163–184. DOI: 10.2307/3087796Search in Google Scholar

Cannon, Garland. 1986. Blends in English word formation. Linguistics 24(4). 725–753. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1986.24.4.725Search in Google Scholar

Cannon, Garland. 2000. Blending. In Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie/Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An international handbook on inflection and word-formation. 1. Halbband, De Gruyter Mouton. 952–956. DOI: 10.1515/9783110111286.1.12.952Search in Google Scholar

Dabulskis, Mindaugas. 2012. https://github.com/mindausai/honors-project/blob/master/all_blends_complete.txtSearch in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 2014. Making new words. Morphological derivation in English. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712367.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Roswitha. 1998. Lexical change in present-day English. A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and productivity of creative neologisms. Gunter Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Gardani, Francesco. 2018. On morphological borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(10). e12302. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12302Search in Google Scholar

Gardani, Francesco, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze. 2015. Borrowed morphology: An overview. In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds.), Borrowed morphology, De Gruyter Mouton. 1–23. DOI: 10.1515/9781614513209.1Search in Google Scholar

Grant, Anthony. 2012. Bound morphology in English (and beyond): Copy or cognate? In Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds.), Copies versus cognates in bound morphology, Brill. 99–122. DOI: 10.1163/9789004230477_006Search in Google Scholar

Haas, Wim de & Mieke Trommelen. 1993. Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. SDU Uitgeverij.Search in Google Scholar

Hacken, Pius ten & Renáta Panocová. 2020. Word formation, borrowing and their interaction. In Pius ten Hacken & Renáta Panocová (eds.), The interaction of borrowing and word formation, Edinburgh University Press. 3–14.Search in Google Scholar

van Haeringen, Coenraad B. 1945. Cafetaria, taria. De Nieuwe Taalgids 38. 148–149.Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2004a. From rapo to lullo: About an informal internationalese. In Anna Duszak & Urszula Okulska (eds.), Speaking from the margin. Global English from a European perspective, Peter Lang. 69–75.Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2004b. The relation between formal and informal style with respect to language change. In Christine Dabelsteen & J. Normann Jørgensen (eds.), Languaging and language practicing, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Humanities. 168–195.Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2010. The productivity of blending: Linguistic or cognitive? Or how to deal with administrivia and ostalgia. In Danuta Stanulewicz, Tadeusz Z. Wolański & Joanna Redzimska (eds.), Lingua terra cognita II. A festschrift for professor Roman Kalisz, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. 467–490.Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2012. From prof to provo: Some observations on Dutch clippings. In Bert Botma & Roland Noske (eds.), Phonological explorations: Empirical, theoretical and diachronic issues, De Gruyter. 25–40. DOI: 10.1515/9783110295177.25Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2014. What makes a blend – a reading report and some observations. In Grzegorz A. Kleparski, Ewa Konieczna & Beata Kopecka (eds.), Linguistics and methodology, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. 240–256.Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2017. Language change and morphological processes. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting 3(1). 1–23. DOI: 10.1515/yplm-2017-0001Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2018. Between Abi and Propjes: Some remarks about clipping in English, German, Dutch and Swedish. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 15(2). 24–59.Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2019. Een woordsoort als brug. Brünner Beitrage zur Germanistik und Nordistik 33(2). 79–91. 10.5817//BBGN2019-2-1Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2020a. The difference between blends and clipped compounds. In Gabi Danon (ed.), Proceedings of IATL 34. Papers from the 34th Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics. 31–43.Search in Google Scholar

Hamans, Camiel. 2020b. How an ‘Italian’ suffix became productive in Germanic languages. In Pius ten Hacken & Renáta Panocová (eds.), The interaction of borrowing and word formation, Edinburgh University Press. 140–161.Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A modern English grammar. Part 4: Morphology. Ejnar Munksgaard.Search in Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 1999. The dynamics of code-copying in language encounters. In Bernt Brendemoen, Elizabeth Lanza & Else Ryen (eds.), Language encounters across time and space, Novus Forlag. 37–62.Search in Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars, 2002. Do languages die of ‘structuritis’? On the role of code-copying in language endangerment. Rivista di Linguistica 14(2). 249–270.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Michael H. 1998. To “brunch” or to “brench”. Some aspects of blend structure. Linguistics 36(3). 579–590. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1998.36.3.579Search in Google Scholar

Konieczna, Ewa. 2012. Lexical blending in Polish: A result of the internationalisation of Slavic languages. In Vincent Renner, François Maniez & Pierre Arnaud (eds.), Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending, De Gruyter Mouton. 51–73. DOI: 10.1515/9783110289572.51Search in Google Scholar

Lalić-Krstin, Gordana 2008. Portmanteau animals and their portmanteau names in English and Serbian. In Katarina Rasulić & Ivana Trbojević-Milošević (eds.), International Conference English Language and Literature Studies: Structures across Culture proceedings. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy. 231–239.Search in Google Scholar

Land, Wouter van der. 2019. Schel en andere dorado’s. Neerlandistiek.nl 02/11/2019 https://www.neerlandistiek.nl/2019/11/schel-en-andere-dorados/ (date of access 09/04/2020).Search in Google Scholar

Lappe, Sabine. 2007. English prosodic morphology. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of Present-Day English word-formation (2nd edition, revised and enlarged.). Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511809873Search in Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron. 2011. Universals of structural borrowing. In Peter Siemund (ed.), Linguistic universals and language variation, De Gruyter Mouton. 200–229. DOI: 10.1515/9783110238068.204Search in Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel. 2007. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31(4). 829–865. DOI: 10.1075/sl.31.4.05matSearch in Google Scholar

Meesters, Gert. 2004. Marginale morfologie in het Nederlands. Paradigmatische samenstellingen, neoklassieke composita en splintercompositia. KANTL.Search in Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993. Duelling languages. Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol & Janice Jake. 2009. A universal model of code-switching and bilingual language processing and production. In Barbara E. Bullock & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching, Cambridge University Press. 336–357. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511576331.020Search in Google Scholar

Moreton, Elliott, Jennifer L. Smith, Katya Pertsova, Rachel Broad & Brandon Prickett. 2017. Emergent positional privilege in novel English blends. Language 93(2). 347–380.Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Norde, Muriel & Sarah Sippach. 2019. Nerdalicious scientainment. A network analysis of English libfixes. Word Structure 12(3). 353–384. DOI: 10.3366/word.2019.0153Search in Google Scholar

Pajerová, Kristina. 2018. Blends in het Nederlands. Blends in Dutch language. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Palacký University.Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela & George J. Xydopoulos. 2012. Blend formation in Modern Greek. In Vincent Renner, François Maniez & Pierre Arnaud (eds.), Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending, De Gruyter Mouton. 35–50. DOI: 10.1515/9783110289572.35Search in Google Scholar

Renner, Vincent. 2018. Structural borrowing in word-formation: An exploratory overview. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 15(2). 2–12.Search in Google Scholar

Renner, Vincent, François Maniez & Pierre Arnaud (eds.). 2012. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110289572Search in Google Scholar

Sakel, Jeanette. 2007. Types of loan: Matter and pattern. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, De Gruyter Mouton. 15–29. DOI: 10.1515/9783110199192.15Search in Google Scholar

Seifart, Frank. 2017. Patterns of affix borrowing in a sample of 100 languages. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7(3). 389–431. DOI: 10.1075/jhl.16002.seiSearch in Google Scholar

Seifart, Frank. 2020. AfBo: A world-wide survey of affix borrowing. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://afbo.info. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3610155Search in Google Scholar

Sijs, Nicoline van der. 2002. Verkortingen. Onze Taal 71. 210–211.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Chris. 2014. The phonesthetics of blends: A lexicographic study of cognitive blends in the OED. ExELL: Explorations in English Language and Linguistics 2(1). 12–45. DOI: 10.1515/exell-2016-0002Search in Google Scholar

Stamenov, Christo. 2015. Borrowing word-formation: -ing suffixation and blending in Bulgarian. Sŭpostavitelno Ezikoznanie/Contrastive Linguistics 2015(3): 163–179.Search in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact. An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zabrocki, Ludwik. 1962. Phon, Phonem und distinktives Morphem. Biuletyn Fonograficzny 5: 59–87. [reprinted in Zabrocki (1980): 101–104.]Search in Google Scholar

Zabrocki, Ludwik. 1969. Phonologie und distinctive Morphologie. In Alexandru Graur (ed.), Actes du Xe Congrès International des Linguistes Bucarest 1967, Editions de l’Académie de la République socialiste de Roumanie. 367–375. [reprinted in Zabrocki (1980): 105–112.]Search in Google Scholar

Zabrocki, Ludwik. 1980. U podstaw struktury i rozwoju języka. At the foundation of language structure and development. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold. 2010. Libfixes. Arnold Zwicky’s Blog 23/01/2010. https://arnoldzwicky.org/2010/01/23/libfixes/Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo