On Intensive Endophoric Devices in English

Bach, Emmon. 1970. Problominalization. Linguistic Inquiry 1(1). 121–122.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Carl Lee. 1995. Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 71(1). 63–101. DOI: 10.2307/41596310.2307/415963Search in Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1987. He himself: Anaphor, pronoun, or...? Linguistic Inquiry 18(2). 345–348.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Conditions on transformations. In Noam Chomsky, Essays on form and interpretation. New York, NY: North Holland. 81–160.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1994. The theory of principles and parameters. In NoamSearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, The Minimalist Program. 13–127. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.000110.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Ariel. 2001. On the generic use of indefinite singulars. Journal of Semantics 18(3). 183–209. DOI: 10.1093/jos/18.3.18310.1093/jos/18.3.183Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1). 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Gast, Volker & Peter Siemund. 2006. Rethinking the relationship between SELF-intensifiers and reflexives. Linguistics 44(2). 343–381. DOI: 10.1515/LING.2006.01310.1515/LING.2006.013Search in Google Scholar

Goodall, Grant. 1984. Parallel structures in syntax. Ph.D. thesis, University of California San Diego.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 2006. Last resorts and grammaticality. In Hans Broekhuis & Ralph Vogel (eds.), Optimality Theory and Minimalism: A possible convergence?, 33–41. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Austin. 1970. Conditions on English comparative clause pairings. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 30–55. Waltham: Ginn & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Hankamer, Jorge. 1971 Constraints on deletion in syntax. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University.Search in Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert & William Idsardi. 2014. A program for the Minimalist Program. In Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork & Lilia Schürcks (eds.), Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, 9–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Ioup, Georgette. 1977. Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(2). 233–245.10.1007/BF00351105Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Volker Gast. 2002. Reflexive pronouns and other uses of ‘self’-forms in English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 50(3). 225–238.Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2000. Locally free self-forms, logophoricity, and intensification in English. English Language and Linguistics 4(2). 183–204. DOI: 10.1017/S136067430000022810.1017/S1360674300000228Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard Link & Gennaro Chierchia. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In Gregory Carlson & Francis Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, 1–124. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Krivochen, Diego Gabriel. 2015. On Phrase Structure building and labelling algorithms: Towards a non-uniform theory of syntactic structures. The Linguistic Review 32(3). 515–572. DOI: 10.1515/tlr-2014-003010.1515/tlr-2014-0030Search in Google Scholar

Krivochen, Diego Gabriel. 2017. Syntax as graph theory. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003842Search in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony S. & Aravind K. Joshi. 1987. Analyzing extraposition in tree adjoining grammar. In Geoffrey J. Huck & Almerindo E. Ojeda (eds.), Syntax and semantics 20: Discontinuous constituency, 107–151. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373204_006Search in Google Scholar

Ladusaw, William A. 1980. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Bloomington, IN: University of Iowa, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1965. On the nature of syntactic iIrregularity. Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 2011. What kind of computing device is the human language faculty? In Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx (eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty, 354-365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lees, Robert B. & Edward S. Klima. 1963. Rules for English pronominalization. Language 39(1). 17–28. DOI: 10.2307/41075910.2307/410759Search in Google Scholar

Leskosky, Richard J. 1972. Intensive reflexives. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 2(1). 42–65.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1991. Pragmatic reduction of the Binding Conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27(1). 107–161.10.1017/S0022226700012433Search in Google Scholar

May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1998, The syntactic phenomena of English. (2nd edn) Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. 1969. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In David Reibel & Sanford Schane (eds.), Modern studies in English: Readings in transformational grammar, 201–224. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul M. 1971. Cross-over phenomena. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Reuland, Eric & Tanya Reinhart. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 23(4). 657–720.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Craige. 2003. Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(3). 287–350.10.1023/A:1024157132393Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1969. Auxiliaries as main verbs. In William Todd, (ed.), Studies in philosophical linguistics, 77–102. Evanstown, IL: Great Expectations.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1970. Gapping and the order of constituents. In Actes du X^e Congrès international des linguistes, 841–853. Bucharest.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1991. Verbiness and the size of niches in the English auxiliary. In Carol Georgopolous & Roberta Ishihara (eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S-Y. Kuroda, 459–466. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_24Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 2012. A preliminary, but fattened, list of transformations. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jlawler/haj/Preliminarybufattenedlistoftransformations.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Safir, Ken. 2004. The syntax of anaphora. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195166132.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195166132.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schmerling, Susan F.. 1976. Aspects of English sentence stress. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.10.7560/703124Search in Google Scholar

Schmerling, Susan F. 1983. A new theory of English auxiliaries. In Frank Heny & Barry Richards (eds.), Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles (vol. 2), 1–53. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-6992-6_1Search in Google Scholar

Schmerling, Susan F. 2018. Rhetorical meaning. Linguistic Frontiers 1(1). 55–64. DOI: 10.2478/lf-2018-000110.2478/lf-2018-0001Search in Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter. 2000. Intensifiers: A comparison of English and German. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar