[Arnovick, Leslie Katharine. 1990. The development of future constructions in English: The pragmatics of modal and temporal will and shall in Middle English (Berkeley Insights in Linguistics and Semiotics 2). New York, etc.: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arnovick, Leslie Katharine. 1999. Diachronic pragmatics: Seven case studies in English illocutionary development (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 68). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.68]Search in Google Scholar
[Austin, John Langshow. 1962. How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford, etc.: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bax, Marcel & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. The historical understanding of historical (im)politeness. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12. 1-24.10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.01bax]Search in Google Scholar
[Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in interaction (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 167).10.1075/pbns.167]Search in Google Scholar
[Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyd, Julian & James Peter Thorne. 1969. The semantics of modal verbs. Journal of Linguistics 5. 57-74.10.1017/S002222670000205X]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, Penelope & Steven Curtis Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18. 159-212.10.1017/S0047404500013464]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 349-367.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Culpeper, Jonathan & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2010. Historical (im)politeness (Linguistic Insights: Studies in Language and Communication 65). Bern, etc.: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0025-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 42). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.42]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, Gwyne Blakemore (ed.). 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fillmore, Charles John. 1975 [1997]. Sant Cruz Lectures on Deixis, 1971. Indiana: Indiana Linguistics Club. [Reprinted in: Charles John Fillmore. 1997. Lectures on deixis. Stanford: CSLI Publications.] Gotti, Maurizio, Marina Dossena, Richard Dury, Roberta Facchinetti & Maria Lima. 2002. Variation in central modals: A repertoire of forms and types of usage in Middle English and Early Modern English (Linguistic Insights: Studies in Language and Communication 4). Bern, etc.: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacobs, Andreas & Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35), 3-33. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.35.04jac]Search in Google Scholar
[Jucker, Andreas H. 2008. Politeness in the history of English. In Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti & Marina Dossena (eds.), English historical linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21-25 August 2006, 3-29. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cilt.296.04juc]Search in Google Scholar
[Jucker, Andreas H. 2011. Positive and negative face as descriptive categories in the history of English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12. 178-197.10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.08juc]Search in Google Scholar
[Jucker, Andreas H. 2012. Changes in politeness cultures. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 422-433. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036]Search in Google Scholar
[Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2008. Apologies in the history of English: Routinized and lexicalized expressions of responsibility and regret. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 229-244. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.176.12juc]Search in Google Scholar
[Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. Directives in Old English. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 27-44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.176.04koh]Search in Google Scholar
[Kopytko, Roman. 1993. Polite discourse in Shakespeare’s English. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Kopytko, Roman. 1995. Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare’s plays. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35), 515-540. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.35.27kop]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakayasu, Minako. 2009. The pragmatics of modals in Shakespeare (Polish Studies in English Language and Literature 30). Frankfurt am Main, etc.: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevala, Minna. 2010. Politeness. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics 8), 419-450. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1515/9783110214284.6.419]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.). 1996. Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 15). Amsterdam & Atlanta: Editions Rodopi B. V.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oakeshott-Taylor, John. 1984. Factuality, tense, intonation and perspective: Some thoughts on the semantics of ‘think’. Lingua 62. 289-317.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rudanko, Juhani. 2006. Aggravated impoliteness and two types of speaker intention in an episode in Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 829-841.10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Searle, John Rogers. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5. 1-23.10.1017/S0047404500006837]Search in Google Scholar
[Spevack, Marvin (ed.). 1968-1980. A complete and systematic concordance to the works of Shakespeare. 9 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker. 2008. Speech acts now and then. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 1-23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.176.02taa]Search in Google Scholar
[Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1972. A history of English syntax: A transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure (The Transatlantic Series in Linguistics). New York, etc.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ]Search in Google Scholar