[
Ameztegui A, Gil-Tena A, Faus J, Pigué M, Brotons L & Camprodon J 2018: Bird community response in mountain pine forests of the Pyrenees managed under a shelterwood system. Forest Ecology and Management 407: 95–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Angelstam P 2004: Habitat thresholds and effects of forest landscape change on the distribution and abundance of black grouse and capercaillie. Ecological Bulletins 51: 173–187.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bivand R & Wong D 2018: Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. Test 27(3): 716–748.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brambilla M, Bergero V, Bassi E & Falco R 2015: Current and future effectiveness of Natura 2000 network in the central Alps for the conservation of mountain forest owl species in a warming climate. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 35–44. DOI: 10.1007%2Fs10344-014-0864-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braunisch V, Roder S, Coppes J, Froidevaux JS, Arlettaz R & Bollmann K 2019: Structural complexity in managed and strictly protected mountain forests: Effects on the habitat suitability for indicator bird species. Forest Ecology and Management 448: 139–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.06.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brunet J, Fritz Ö & Richnau G 2010: Biodiversity in European beech forests-a review with recommendations for sustainable forest management. Ecological Bulletins 53: 77–94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buckley P & Mills J 2015: The flora and fauna of coppice woods: winners and losers of active management or neglect?, 129–139. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danko Š, Darolová A & Krištín A 2002: Birds distribution in Slovakia. VEDA, Bratislava.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Enoksson B, Angelstam P & Larsson K 1995: Deciduous forest and resident birds: the problem of fragmentation within a coniferous forest landscape. Landscape Ecology 10: 267–275.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Felton A, Hedwall PO, Lindbladh M, Nyberg T, Felton AM, Holmström E, Wallin I, Löf M & Brunet J 2016: The biodiversity contribution of wood plantations: Contrasting the bird communi-ties of Sweden’s protected and production oak forests. Forest Ecology and Management 365: 51–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuller RJ 2012: Avian responses to transitional habitats in temperate cultural landscapes: wood-land edges and young-growth, 125–149. In: Fuller RJ (ed), Birds and Habitat. Relationships in Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galeotti P 2001: Strix aluco tawny owl. BWP Update 3(1): 43−77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grantham HS, Duncan A, Evans TD, Jones KR, Beyer HL, Schuster R, Walston J, Ray JC, Robin-son JG, Callow M, Clements T, Costa HM, DeGemmis A, Elsen PR, Ervin J, Franco P, Goldman E, Goetz S, Hansen A, Hofsvang E, Jantz P, Jupiter S, Kang A, Langhammer P, Laurance WF, Lie-berman S, Linkie M, Malhi Y, Maxwell S, Mendez M, Mittermeier R, Murray NJ, Radachowsky J, Saatchi S, Samper C, Silverman J, Shapiro A, Strassburg B, Stevens T, Stokes E, Taylor R, Tear T, Tizzard R, Venter O, Visconti P, Wang S & Watson, J. E. 2020: Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nature Communications 11(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19493-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E, Koivunen V & Kurki S 1997: Boreal owl responses to forest management: a review. Journal of Raptor Research 31(2): 125–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hermy M 2015: Evolution and changes in the understorey of deciduous forests: lagging behind drivers of change, 174–192. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill AP, Prince P, Snaddon JL, Doncaster CP, Rogers A 2019: AudioMoth: A low-cost acoustic de-vice for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. HardwareX 6:e00073.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hinsley SA, Fuller RJ & Ferns PN 2015: The changing fortunes of woodland birds in temperate Europe, 154–173. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jansson G, Angelstam P, Åberg J & Swenson JE 2004: Management targets for the conservation of hazel grouse in boreal landscapes. Ecological Bulletins 51: 259–264.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirby KJ & Watkins C 2015: Overview of Europe’s woods and forests. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Law BE, Berner LT, Buotte PC, Mildrexler DJ & Ripple WJ 2021: Strategic Forest Reserves can protect biodiversity in the western United States and mitigate climate change. Communications Earth and Environment 254(2). DOI: 10.1038/s43247-021-00326-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lešo P, Kropil R & Kajtoch Ł 2019: Effects of forest management on bird assemblages in oak-dominated stands of the Western Carpathians – Refuges for rare species. Forest Ecology and Management 453: 117620. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117620
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lõhmus A, Lõhmus P, Remm J & Vellak K 2005: Old-growth structural elements in a strict reser-ve and commercial forest landscape in Estonia. Forest Ecology and Management 216(1–3): 201–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marchesi L, Sergio F & Pedrini P 2006: Implications of temporal changes in forest dynamics on density, nest-site selection, diet and productivity of Tawny Owls Strix aluco in the Alps. Bird Study 53: 310–318. DOI: 10.1080/00063650609461447
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mestecăneanu A & Mestecăneanu F 2020: Considerations on the density, preference of habitat and ethology of the pygmy owl (Glaucidium passerinum Linnaeus, 1758) from the Făgăraş, Iezer-Păpuşa and Leaota Mountains (Southern Carpathians, Romania). Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii Şi Comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. 36(1): 109–117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mikkola H 1983: Owls of Europe. T. & A.D. Poyser. Calton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morales-Hidalgo D, Oswalt SN & Somanathan E 2015: Status and trends in global primary forest, protected areas, and areas designated for conservation of biodiversity from the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Forest Ecology and Management 352: 68–77. DOI: 10.1016/J.FORECO.2015.06.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller J, Hothorn T & Pretzsch H 2007: Long-term effects of logging intensity on structures, birds, saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi in stands of European beech Fagus sylvatica L. Forest Ecology and Management 242(2–3): 297–305. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2007.01.046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pačenovský S & Šotnár K 2010: Notes on the reproduction, breeding biology and ethology of the Eurasian pygmy owl (Glaucidium passerinum) in Slovakia. Slovak Raptor Journal 4: 49–81. DOI: 10.2478/v10262-012-0046-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paillet Y, Bergès L, Hjältén J, Odor P, Avon C, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Bijlsma RJ, De Bruyn L, Fuhr M, Grandin U, Kanka R, Lundin L, Luque S,Magura T, Matesanz S, Mészáros I, Sebastià MT, Schmidt W, Standovár T, Tóthmérész B, Uotila A, Valladares F, Vellak K & Virtanen R 2010: Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: Meta- analysis of species richness in Europe. Conservation biology 24(1): 101–112. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rumbutis S, Vaitkuvienė D, Grašytė G, Dagys M, Dementavičius D & Treinys R 2017: Adaptive habitat preferences in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco. Bird Study 64(3): 421–430. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2017.1369001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Savill P 2015: High forest management and the rise of even-aged stands, 93–106. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schall P, Gossner MM, Heinrichs S, Fischer M, Boch S, Prati D, Jung K, Baumgartner V, Blaser S, Böhm S, Buscot F, Daniel R, Goldmann K, Kaiser K, Kahl T, Lange M, Müller J, Overmann J, Renner SC, Schulze ED, Sikorski J, Tschapka M, Türke M, Weisser WW, Wemheuer B, Wubet T & Ammer C 2018: The impact of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 55(1): 267–278. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12950
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ševčík R, Riegert J, Šťastný K, Zárybnický J & Zárybnická M 2021: The effect of environmental variables on owl distribution in Central Europe: A case study from the Czech Republic. Ecological Informatics 64: 101375. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101375
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Šotnár K, Obuch J, Pačenovský S & Jarčuška B 2020: Spatial distribution of four sympatric owl species in Carpathian montane forests. Raptor Journal 14: 1–13. DOI: 10.2478/srj-2020-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Virkkala R, Rajasärkkä A, Väisänen RA, Vickholm M & Virolainen E 1994: The significance of protected areas for the land birds of southern Finland. Conservation Biology 8(2): 532–544.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voous KH 1960: Atlas of European Birds. Nelson, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrezec A & Tome D 2004: Altitudinal segregation between Ural Owl Strix uralensis and Tawny Owl S. aluco: evidence for competitive exclusion in raptorial birds. Bird Study 51(3): 264–269. DOI: 10.1080/00063650409461362
]Search in Google Scholar
